View clinical trials related to Neck Pain.
Filter by:This study will evaluate placebo mechanisms related to dry needling(DN) trying to determinate whether an additive effect occurs when DN is provided with an instructional set known to enhance placebo analgesia. External manipulation of patient expectation for receiving DN will be performed, in a similar way as has been already done in studies investigating the influence of expectation on spinal manipulative therapy interventions. The main purpose of this study will be therefore to determine, for the first time, how subjects' expectation about the effect of DN influences the resultant hypoalgesia. Analgesic effects of DN will be assessed using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, which has not been previously evaluated in relation to DN.
There is a lot of scientific evidence about the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise / training in subjects with cervical pain. Most of the high quality systematic reviews agree on the need to combine manual therapy and exercise for the treatment of chronic cervical pain. However, articles that focus on manual therapy in the treatment of the upper cervical spine are not as common, being that the most commonly prescribed exercises are those of craniocervical flexion, (flexion of the upper cervical spine). The investigators believe that participants who are going to benefit more from the integration of manual therapy and exercise will be those who have a real restriction of the upper cervical spine, and for these, is indispensable, the application of manual therapy techniques before the integration of the active exercise to obtain optimal results. This project is going to try to define participants with chronic cervical pain and upper cervical spine restriction that may benefit more from the combination of manual therapy and exercise than the rest. The investigators are going to study changes in different variables about function, pain, ultrasound, muscle tone, joints... Strengthen the importance of specificity in physiotherapy interventions and increase the evidence on the importance of manual therapy in a subgroup of participants with chronic cervical pain, improve knowledge about the involvement of the upper cervical spine in cervical pathology and check the effectiveness of a self-treatment program for participants with chronic cervical pain. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of an integrative approach of manual therapy associated with exercise versus exercise in participants with chronic cervical pain and upper cervical spine dysfunction. For this purpose, the investigators conduct a randomized controlled trial, simple-blind (Only is possible to blind the evaluator). The Sample size is 52 participants (2 groups of 26 participants). One of the groups will receive 4 training sessions with exercises for the cervical spine between 30 and 45 minutes duration per session and the other group will receive 4 sessions of a combination of manual therapy and training exercises also between 30 and 45 minutes each session. In addition, all participants will receive self-treatment techniques for self-management of their dysfunction. Cervical exercises will consist of a set of training techniques to improve the function and symptomatology that the participant has. These exercises have been widely evidenced and do not suppose any health risk. The techniques of manual therapy can be the manipulation technique in resting position, vertebral mobilization and / or musculature (massage and / or stretching). All the treatments applied follow the safety recommendations of the International Federation of Orthopedic Manual Therapists (IFOMPT). If participants need clarification, they can talk to the principal investigator (Jacobo Rodríguez Sanz) at any time. One physiotherapist will perform the physical examination, and a different one will apply the treatment. Physical therapists doing the screening will not know which group has been assigned to them, so the participant will be asked not to provide the evaluators any information about the assignment of his group to improve the quality of the study. The examination will consist of tests to assess whether the participant is a candidate to participate in the study, the measurement of pain, the exhaustive assessment of all cervical musculature with different measuring instruments and the measurement of joint mobility. The first day theparticipant be given information about his pain, his daily habits and activities that he usually does. The assessment of his problem will consist in the measurement of the amount of movement he can makes in the cervical area without pain, the ability to orient himself in certain movements with his eyes closed, the intensity of his pain, the evaluation of the state of his muscles. stabilizing as a mobilizer through ultrasound, muscle test and palpation. The functionality of his cervical vertebrae will also be evaluated and he will be asked different questionnaires about the functionality, pain and condition of his cervical pain, headache (in case of suffering) and kinesiophobia. Both the evaluation and the treatment will be without pain. In addition, he will be given a series of personalized exercises to improve his problem, which must be done every day during the study.
This study will compare the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education and neck/shoulder traditional exercises versus pain neuroscience education and neck/shoulder suspension training exercises for patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain (CINP).
This study will examine a e-health resilience based program, JOOL, for chronic spine pain patients through the following aims: Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of a resilience based program known as JOOL Aim 2: To evaluate the characteristics of the participants most likely to benefit from this treatment
First, we aim to determine if there is a difference in the rate of improvement, as measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), across a 6 week treatment period between those treated with DN only and those treated with DN and intramuscular electrical stimulation (IES) in subjects with upper trapezius active trigger points (aTrPs). Secondly, we want to determine if improvements in clinical outcomes (NDI and NPRS) of patients with upper trapezius active trigger points (aTrPs) treated with dry needling (DN) alone or dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation (DN/IES) are maintained 6 weeks post treatment without further intervention. Research Questions: 1. Is there a difference in the rate of improvement in NDI and NPRS across a 6 week treatment period in subjects with upper trapezius active trigger points (aTrPs) between those treated with DN only and those treated with DN and intramuscular electrical stimulation (IES)? 2. Are improvements in clinical outcomes (NDI and NPRS) of patients with upper trapezius active trigger points (aTrPs) treated with dry needling (DN) maintained 6 weeks post treatment without further intervention? Tertiary exploration: If improvement is maintained, is there a difference in outcome maintenance between groups? Did improvement increase between 6 and 12 weeks?
The purpose of this prospective cohort survey study is to further explore the incidence of adverse events with dry needling by physical therapists - as well as any differences or similarities between patient-reported vs therapist-reported incidence of AEs.
Efficacy of intra-articular steroid injection for inflamed atlantoaxial joint in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Inclusion criteria Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with MRI findings of atlantoaxial joint inflammation and failure of resolution after 2 weeks systemic steroid administration Exclusion criteria Coagulopathy, allergy to contrast material, pregnancy Interventional group (AS) group, received intra-articular steroid injection for atlantoaxial joint. , in addition to methotrexate and chloroquine 400 mg per day.
This is a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of Fu's subcutaneous needle (FSN) and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on chronic neck pain by using more objective assessment tools such as Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scales, Pressure Pain Threshold and Myotone of MTrPs of Upper Trapezius Muscles, Range of Motion of Stretch of Upper Trapezius Muscle, and Pittsburgh sleep quality index.
No studies have investigated the effects of a Sciatic nerve mobilization in subjects with neck pain. This study aims to determine the immediate effects of a lower limbs neural mobilization on cervical range of motion and on the perception of pain in the most common trigger points located in the cervical musculature.
Dry needling (DN) is a treatment technique widely used in patients with various musculoskeletal health problems due to myofascial trigger points (MTrP). DN has shown to have positive effect on pain and function in patients with mechanical neck pain. These positive results are thought to be the consequence of specific neurophysiological and mechanical processes. Research has shown that DN induces 1) end plate inhibition, 2) reduction of inflammatory substances, 3) increase of blood flow and oxygen and 4) a reduction of nociceptive afferent activity. However, the exact working mechanisms underlying DN effects is still a topic of debate. This trial addresses one of the major methodological issues in needle testing,the effects of proper blinding. DN is a specific technique that is not easily be replaced by another comparable intervention. A sham needle with a blunt tip was created that simulates penetration into the skin without actually doing so. Research about a valid method for the control in needling studies is for this reason of particular relevance. A proper blinding technique is of importance to further the field of DN.