View clinical trials related to Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Filter by:This phase II trial studies the side effects of a cord blood transplant using dilanubicel and to see how well it works in treating patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive hematologic (blood) cancers. After a cord blood transplant, the immune cells, including white blood cells, can take a while to recover, putting the patient at increased risk of infection. Dilanubicel consists of blood stem cells that help to produce mature blood cells, including immune cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Total body irradiation is a type of whole-body radiation. Giving chemotherapy and total-body irradiation before a cord blood transplant with dilanubicel may help to kill any cancer cells that are in the body and make room in the patient's bone marrow for new stem cells to grow and reduce the risk of infection.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and/or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ASP7517. This study will also evaluate the clinical response of ASP7517 as well as other measures of anticancer activity of ASP7517.
A Phase 1/2a study to assess the safety, tolerability, PK and biological activity of CCS1477 in patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic syndrome.
A Phase 3b, open-label, single-arm, rollover study to evaluate the long-term safety of luspatercept, to the following participants: - Participants receiving luspatercept on a parent protocol at the time of their transition to the rollover study, who tolerate the protocol-prescribed regimen in the parent trial and, in the opinion of the investigator, may derive clinical benefit from continuing treatment with luspatercept - Participants in the follow-up phase previously treated with luspatercept or placebo in the parent protocol will continue into long-term post-treatment follow-up in the rollover study until the follow-up commitments are met - The study design is divided into the Transition Phase, Treatment Phase and Follow-up Phase. Participants will enter transition phase and depending on their background will enter either the treatment phase or the Long-term Post-treatment Follow-up (LTPTFU) phase - Transition Phase is defined as one Enrollment visit - Treatment Phase: For participants in luspatercept treatment the dose and schedule of luspatercept in this study will be the same as the last dose and schedule in the parent luspatercept study. This does not apply to participants that are in long-term follow-up from the parent protocol - Follow-up Phase includes: - 42 Day Safety Follow-up Visit - During the Safety Follow up, the participants will be followed for 42 days after the last dose of luspatercept, for the assessment of safety-related parameters and adverse event (AE) reporting - Long-term Post-treatment Follow-up (LTPTFU) Phase - Participants will be followed for overall survival every 6 months for at least 5 years from first dose of luspatercept in the parent protocol, or 3 years of post-treatment from last dose, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a subject is lost to follow-up. Participants will also be monitored for progression to AML or any malignancies/pre-malignancies. New anticancer or disease related therapies should be collected at the same time schedule Participants transitioning from a parent luspatercept study in post-treatment follow-up (safety or LTPTFU) will continue from the same equivalent point in this rollover study. The rollover study will be terminated, and relevant participants will discontinue from the study when all participants fulfill at least 5 years from the first dose of luspatercept in the parent protocol, or 3 years of post-treatment from last dose, whichever occurs later.
Genetic mutations have closely linked to the pathogenesis and prognostication of myeloid cancers. In addition, a number of molecularly targeted agents have been developed in recent years. With the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS), we now are able to detect a wide range of mutations more rapidly, accurately, and economically. In this study, the investigators will use NGS to screen and analyze myeloid-associated gene mutations in the participants, and aim to build up the mutational landscapes of the various myeloid cancers, and investigate how these mutations are linked to clinical outcome.
This phase II trial studies how well Triplex vaccine works in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients undergoing a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CMV is a virus that may be carried for life and does not cause illness in most healthy individuals. However, in people whose immune systems are lowered (such as those undergoing stem cell transplantation), CMV can reproduce and cause disease and even death. The Triplex vaccine is made up of 3 small pieces of CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (the chemical form of genes) placed into a weakened virus called modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) that may help produce immunity (the ability to recognize and respond to an infection) and reduce the risk of developing complications related to CMV infection.
This is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial for the frontline treatment of relapsed AML or MDS following allo-HCT. Eligible subjects will receive up to 4 cycles of combined modality treatment. The number of cycles depends on response, toxicity, and the remaining cell dose.
Study type An observational study conducted in different hematological centers in Belgium. Study objectives Primary objective: To assess the impact of newly started treatments on the QOL of patients suffering from myelodysplastic syndromes. Secondary objectives: - To assess the impact of newly started therapy on disease perception in MDS patients - To study the relation between disease perception and quality of life - To examine which clinical and disease specific factors determine QOL in MDS patients - Collect information on the transfusion threshold in Belgian hematological centers and evaluate the impact on quality of life. - To evaluate whether changes in QOL are related to hematological respons. Study design - Newly diagnosed MDS patients who are about to start a treatment or previously diagnosed MDS patients who are starting with a new line of therapy. - QOL assessment with the QUALMS. - Disease perception measurement using the B-IPQ. - Measurement at diagnosis/before start of therapy, at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and at 24 weeks into treatment. Study endpoints Primary endpoint: Change in QUALMS score at visit timepoints 4 - 12 - 24 weeks after the start of a new treatment. Secondary endpoint: - Change in B-IPQ score at visit timepoints 4 - 12 - 24 weeks after the start of a new treatment - Association between B-IPQ and QUALMS score. - Association between clinical and disease specific factors and QUALMS score - Association between transfusion threshold and QUALMS score. - Association between hematological response and QUALMS score Summary of eligibility criteria - Adult patients with a new diagnosis of MDS (according to WHO 2016 definitions (3) or known patients with MDS who are about to start a new treatment. - Signed informed consent. - Patients enrolled in an unblinded interventional therapeutic trial are eligible. Exclusion criteria - Patients with acute leukemia defined as >20% bone marrow blasts. - Patients suffering from an overlap syndrome myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease. - Patients in post allogeneic transplant setting. - Patients enrolled in a blinded interventional therapeutic trial. - Patients starting with multiple treatments under investigation at the same moment apart from intensive chemotherapy. - Newly diagnosed patients who do not start with treatment. - Patients who started a previous treatment less then 12 weeks ago apart from packed cell transfusion (up to 4 weeks allowed). - Diagnosis of any previous or concomitant malignancy except when the patient successfully completed treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery and/or radiotherapy) with curative intent for this malignancy at least 3 months prior to inclusion. - Patients refusing to sign informed consent.
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and how well cladribine, idarubicin, cytarabine, and quizartinib work in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome that is newly diagnosed, has come back (relapsed), or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Quizartinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving quizartinib with cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine may help to control acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
In this trial the investigators aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of combination Ivosidenib (AG-120) and nivolumab in the context of adult patients with Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutated acute myeloid leukemias (AML) or Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).