Value of MRCP+ And Liver Multiscan in the Management of Dominant Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

MRI Clinical Trial

Official title:

Value of MRCP+ And Liver Multiscan in the Management of Dominant Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05359497
• Other study ID #: MALD study
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2022
• Est. completion date: December 2023

Study information

• Verified date: April 2022
• Source: Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
• Contact: Tim E Middelburg, MSc
• Phone: +31648510414
• Email: t.e.middelburg[@]amsterdamumc.nl
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic progressive biliary disease. Due to the heterogeneous disease course and the relatively low clinical event rate of 5% per year it is difficult to predict prognosis of individual patients. Novel imaging techniques called MRCP+ and Liver Multiscan (LMS) hold the prospect of adequate depicting and quantifying lesions of the biliary tree as well as capturing functional derailment. However, these features must be tested first.

The purpose of this study is to assess the (i) ability of MRCP+ to detect change in biliary volume, (ii) reproducibility of MRCP+ and LMS, and (iii) correlation of MRCP+ with ERC findings as gold standard.

Description:

After informed consent, patients will undergo standard care with blood tests and MRI/MRCP. While performing the MRI, additional sequences called LMS are performed. Thereafter, an ERCP will be performed. Approximately 8 weeks after ERCP, another MRI/MRCP and LMS will be performed. Also, blood tests will be performed and a clinician will evaluate the clinical condition and complaints of patients

Images will be coded and analysed by Perspectum to retrieve MRCP+ and LMS results.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: December 2023
• Est. primary completion date: May 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Established diagnosis according to the IPSCSG Definitions (22)

• Age = 18

• Able to give informed consent

• Clinically suspicious for a dominant stricture

Exclusion Criteria:

• insufficient image quality

• known allergy for MRI contrast agents

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cholangitis
• Cholangitis, Sclerosing
• MRI
• PSC

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• Liver Multiscan sequences baseline
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences at baseline besides standard care MRI liver /MRCP prior to ERCP.

Device:
• MRCP+ analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after MRCP is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
• Liver Multiscan analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences at baseline are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.

Diagnostic Test:
• MRI liver with MRCP
An extra MRI liver with contrast and MRCP is performed 8 weeks after the ERCP following standard care protocol
• Liver Multiscan sequences follow-up
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences are performed at 8 weeks after ERCP.

Device:
• MRCP+ analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after the MRCP from follow up is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
• Liver Multiscan analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences from the follow up scan are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)	Perspectum

References & Publications (20)

Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, Piechnik SK, Sarania N, Philips R, Collier JD, Booth JC, Schneider JE, Wang LM, Delaney DW, Fleming KA, Robson MD, Barnes E, Neubauer S. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12. — View Citation

Barner-Rasmussen N, Pukkala E, Jussila A, Färkkilä M. Epidemiology, risk of malignancy and patient survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a population-based study in Finland. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;55(1):74-81. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1707277. Epub 2020 Jan 4. — View Citation

Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith HJ, Aasen S, Boberg KM, Schrumpf E. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;4(4):514-20. — View Citation

Boonstra K, Weersma RK, van Erpecum KJ, Rauws EA, Spanier BW, Poen AC, van Nieuwkerk KM, Drenth JP, Witteman BJ, Tuynman HA, Naber AH, Kingma PJ, van Buuren HR, van Hoek B, Vleggaar FP, van Geloven N, Beuers U, Ponsioen CY; EpiPSCPBC Study Group. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk, and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):2045-55. doi: 10.1002/hep.26565. Epub 2013 Oct 17. — View Citation

Bradley CR, Cox EF, Scott RA, James MW, Kaye P, Aithal GP, Francis ST, Guha IN. Multi-organ assessment of compensated cirrhosis patients using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Hepatol. 2018 Nov;69(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 Jun 8. — View Citation

Dave M, Elmunzer BJ, Dwamena BA, Higgins PD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):387-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091953. — View Citation

European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009 Aug;51(2):237-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 6. — View Citation

Goldfinger MH, Ridgway GR, Ferreira C, Langford CR, Cheng L, Kazimianec A, Borghetto A, Wright TG, Woodward G, Hassanali N, Nicholls RC, Simpson H, Waddell T, Vikal S, Mavar M, Rymell S, Wigley I, Jacobs J, Kelly M, Banerjee R, Brady JM. Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep;52(3):807-820. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27113. Epub 2020 Mar 8. — View Citation

Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lindor KD, Adams DH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;382(9904):1587-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60096-3. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Review. — View Citation

Lazaridis KN, LaRusso NF. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1161-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1506330. Review. — View Citation

Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Harrison ME; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):646-59; quiz 660. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.112. Epub 2015 Apr 14. — View Citation

Lunder AK, Hov JR, Borthne A, Gleditsch J, Johannesen G, Tveit K, Viktil E, Henriksen M, Hovde Ø, Huppertz-Hauss G, Høie O, Høivik ML, Monstad I, Solberg IC, Jahnsen J, Karlsen TH, Moum B, Vatn M, Negård A. Prevalence of Sclerosing Cholangitis Detected by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in Patients With Long-term Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016 Oct;151(4):660-669.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jun 21. — View Citation

Pavlides M, Banerjee R, Tunnicliffe EM, Kelly C, Collier J, Wang LM, Fleming KA, Cobbold JF, Robson MD, Neubauer S, Barnes E. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity. Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1065-1073. doi: 10.1111/liv.13284. Epub 2017 May 30. — View Citation

Ponsioen CY, Arnelo U, Bergquist A, Rauws EA, Paulsen V, Cantú P, Parzanese I, De Vries EM, van Munster KN, Said K, Chazouillères O, Desaint B, Kemgang A, Färkkilä M, Van der Merwe S, Van Steenbergen W, Marschall HU, Stotzer PO, Thorburn D, Pereira SP, Aabakken L. No Superiority of Stents vs Balloon Dilatation for Dominant Strictures in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):752-759.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.034. Epub 2018 May 24. — View Citation

Ponsioen CY, Assis DN, Boberg KM, Bowlus CL, Deneau M, Thorburn D, Aabakken L, Färkkilä M, Petersen B, Rupp C, Hübscher SG; PSC Study Group. Defining Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Results From an International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group Consensus Process. Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1764-1775.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.046. Epub 2021 Aug 10. — View Citation

Ponsioen CY, Chapman RW, Chazouillères O, Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lohse AW, Pinzani M, Schrumpf E, Trauner M, Gores GJ. Surrogate endpoints for clinical trials in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Review and results from an International PSC Study Group consensus process. Hepatology. 2016 Apr;63(4):1357-67. doi: 10.1002/hep.28256. Epub 2015 Dec 23. Review. — View Citation

Ponsioen CY, Reitsma JB, Boberg KM, Aabakken L, Rauws EA, Schrumpf E. Validation of a cholangiographic prognostic model in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):742-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255527. Epub 2010 Jul 9. — View Citation

Selvaraj EA, Culver EL, Coller J. Combination of quantitative MRCP and MRI demonstrates increased periductal iron-corrected T1 in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 2021;70:A155

Zenouzi R, Welle CL, Venkatesh SK, Schramm C, Eaton JE. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Current State and Future Directions. Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;39(3):369-380. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687853. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Review. — View Citation

Zheng HH, Jiang XL. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis of 16 observational studies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;28(4):383-90. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000576. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 20 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in total biliary volume by MRCP+ and cT1 by LMS 8 weeks after endoscopic treatment of dominant strictures	Decrease in total biliary volume (in ml, measured by MRCP+) and decrease in cT1 (in ms, measured by LiverMultiscan), which will be assessed by performing paired t-tests.	1st MRI: Baseline = week 0. 2nd MRI: week 8 after ERCP
Secondary	Correlation of MRCP+/Liver Multiscan with the modified Amsterdam cholangiographic classification	The outcomes of both MRCP+ and Liver Multiscan of the baseline MRI will be compared with the modified amsterdam cholangiographic classification and the correlation coefficient will be calculated. The cholangiographic classification uses age and classification of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary ducts to determine a prognostic score. This score ranges from 0-40, in which a score of 40 reflects the worst prognosis with e.g. a 1-year survival of 29% and 5-year survival of 3.3%, while zero points reflect a 1-year or 5-year survival of 98% or 94%, respectively.	1st MRI: Baseline = week 0. 2nd MRI: week 8 after ERCP
Secondary	Correlation of imaging features of MRCP+ with classic cholangiography in individual areas of interest by two independent assessors.	MRCP+ given dilatations and strictures are compared with the in-depth assessment of strictures and dilatations of the MRCP, by two independent radiologists, specialized in MRCP. The correlation coefficient will be calculated.	1st MRI: Baseline = week 0. 2nd MRI: week 8 after ERCP
Secondary	Correlation of dominant strictures rated by MRCP+/Liver Multiscan with those assessed by classic definition of dominant strictures.	MRCP+ given strictures with increased liver multiscan values are compared with the assessment (by the hand of the classic definition) of strictures found on MRCP images. The assessment is performed by two independent radiologists, specialized in MRCP. The correlation coefficient will be calculated.	1st MRI: Baseline = week 0. 2nd MRI: week 8 after ERCP
Secondary	Repeated detection of dominant strictures, as determined by two independent assessors, that were not treated by ERC	MRI baseline and follow-up will be assessed for dominant strictures to determine the reproducibility (capability to detect dominant strictures on both baseline and follow-up MRI) of dominant strictures that were not actively treated (dilated) with the invasive ERC. The assessment is performed by two independent radiologists, specialized in MRCP.	1st MRI: Baseline = week 0. 2nd MRI: week 8 after ERCP