Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04775108
Other study ID # MINERVA FIH
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2021
Est. completion date December 31, 2029

Study information

Verified date August 2023
Source Affluent Medical
Contact Christophe Giot
Phone +33 4 42 95 12 20
Email christophe.giot@affluentmedical.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The EPYGON VALVE is an innovative mitral valve, intended for valve replacement of a native mitral valve through a minimally invasive implant procedure by means of a dedicated implant device. The EPYGON VALVE is a bio prosthesis, composed by a functional assembly of bovine pericardium on a NiTinol stent. The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety and feasibility of the Epygon™ Transcatheter mitral valve and the transapical delivery system, in adult patients with severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date December 31, 2029
Est. primary completion date October 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 60 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients of age = 60 years. 2. Patients with primary or secondary severe symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation. 3. Patients with severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation and who have been evaluated by a multidisciplinary Heart Team and deemed to be ineligible for conventional valve surgery and not eligible for transcatheter repair. 4. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction = 30%. 5. Patients in NYHA functional classes III to IV. 6. Patients who have clearly accepted participation in this clinical study and who have signed the informed consent. 7. Patients who are willing to accept and undergo all protocol related requirements. 8. Patients not planning to transfer abroad. Exclusion Criteria: - Clinical exclusion criteria (preoperative screening) 1. Patients involved in other clinical assessments for drugs or devices that could interfere or alter the study endpoints. 2. Patients with clinical/anatomical conditions unsuitable for a transapical surgical approach. 3. Patients who have previously undergone implantation of a transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis. 4. Patients with previous implantation of a mitral heart valve prosthesis. 5. Patients with previous implantation of a mitral annuloplasty ring. 6. Patients needing emergency or life-saving interventions. 7. Patients with a heavily calcified mitral annulus and/or anterior mitral leaflet. 8. Patients with active infection or endocarditis (suspect endocarditis included). 9. Patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass or thrombus. 10. Patients which suffered an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the intended treatment (defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with elevation of CK-MB = 3 times normal in the absence of pathological Q waves), if no assay for CK-MB was performed, elevation of CK level to >2 times normal without new Q waves, or elevated Troponin level is also considered a non-Q wave MI). 11. Patients with an active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 30 days. 12. Patients with a documented allergy towards contrast media, and to any compound of the investigated medical device. 13. Patients that have neurological disease severely affecting ambulation or day to day functioning. 14. Patients with any stroke within the prior 30 days. 15. Patients with senile dementia, according to the advice from a specialized neurologist. 16. Patients in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated since TEE is used for both preoperative screening and guidance during implant procedure. 17. Patients who is unwilling or deemed by the Investigator to be unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol, or subject with a history of non-compliance. 18. Patients unable to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form in absence of legal representative. 19. Patients with a lack of capacity to consent. 20. Patients unable to read and write. - Echographic exclusion criteria (preoperative screening) 21. Patients with left ventricular apex aneurysm; 22. Patients with aorto-mitral angle <120°; 23. Patients with a systolic/diastolic mitral valve area assessed as not compatible with the sizing policy matrix defined by the Sponsor. - Computerized Tomographic (CT) exclusion criteria (preoperative screening) 24. Patients with ventricular morphology (position of papillary muscles, ventricular wall hypertrophy) unsuitable with the study valve design; 25. Patients with aorto-mitral angle <120°; 26. Patients with a systolic/diastolic mitral valve area assessed as not compatible with the sizing policy matrix defined by the Sponsor.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System
The EPYGON VALVE is an innovative mitral valve, intended for valve replacement of a native mitral valve through a minimally invasive implant procedure by means of a dedicated implant device. The EPYGON VALVE is a bio prosthesis, composed by a functional assembly of bovine pericardium on a NiTinol stent.

Locations

Country Name City State
Austria Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck
Austria Medical University of Vienna - Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery Vienna
Italy Careggi Hospital Florence Italy Largo Brambilla Firenze
Italy A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Torino
Serbia Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute Belgrade
Spain Hospital German Trias i Pujol Badalona
Spain Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona
Spain Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid
Spain Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca Murcia
Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio Sevilla

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Epygon

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Italy,  Serbia,  Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Device Safety defined as the absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events evaluated on the following clinical events:
death
major cardiac structural complications (as per MVARC definitions)
life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for = 48H
major vascular complications
stroke
stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis)
[Timeframe: at 30 days]
Primary Device Success Technical Success (as per MVARC definition) defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon Transcatheter mitral valve
Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.
Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
No evidence of structural or functional failure (as per MVARC definition)
No specific device-related technical failure issues and complications (as per MVARC definition)
Reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) to either optimal (0+ to trace) or acceptable (reduced by at least 1 grade from baseline with no more than 2+ MR) without significant mitral stenosis (post-procedure EOA = 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient < 5mmHg) and with no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular MR (and without associated hemolysis)
[Timeframe: at 30 days]
Secondary Device Safety defined as absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events evaluated on the following clinical events:
death
major cardiac structural complications
life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for = 48H
major access complications
stroke
stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis)
[Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Patient success (as per MVARC definition) All of the following must be present:
Device success (either optimal or acceptable)
Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting
No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition (e.g., mitral regurgitation, heart failure)
Improvement from baseline in symptoms (e.g., NYHA improvement by = 1 functional class)
Improvement from baseline in functional status (e.g., 6-min walk test improvement by = 50 m)
Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life (e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improvement by = 10)
[Time frame: 12 months from implantation]
Secondary Evaluation of clinical status on the basis of the NYHA functional classification [Time frame Preoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Six-minute walk test [Time frame: Preoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Quality of Life score (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. [Time frame: Preoperative, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Hemodynamic performance assessed by echocardiography Prosthetic mean atrio-ventricular ?P < 5 mm Hg
Prosthetic Effective Orifice Area (EOA) = 1.5 cm2
Mitral valve regurgitation reduction (vs. preoperative) of at least 1 grade and not more than moderate (2+)
Prosthetic paravalvular valve leakage (PVL) not more than mild (1+) without hemolysis
[Time frame: Preoperative on native mitral valve, Postoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Technical Success (as per MVARC definition) defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon Transcatheter mitral valve
Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.
[Time Frame: immediately after procedure]
Secondary Device Success Technical Success (as per MVARC definition) defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon bioprosthesis
Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.
Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
No evidence of structural or functional failure (as per MVARC definition)
No specific device-related technical failure issues and complications (as per MVARC definition)
Reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) to either optimal (0+ to trace) or acceptable (reduced by at least 1 grade from baseline with no more than 2+ MR) without significant mitral stenosis (post-procedure EOA = 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient < 5mmHg) and with no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular MR (and without associated hemolysis)
[Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Procedural Success All of the following must be present:
Device success (either optimal or acceptable), And
Absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events, including:
death
major cardiac structural complications (as per MVARC definitions)
life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for = 48H
major vascular complications
stroke
stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis).
[Time frame: 30 days]
Secondary Incidence of adverse events [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Incidence of serious adverse events [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Incidence of adverse events related to device [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Incidence of adverse events related to procedure [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
Secondary Absence of all-cause mortality [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02520310 - AVJ-514 Japan Trial N/A
Completed NCT02355418 - The Role of Myocardial Fibrosis in Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Recruiting NCT04577248 - The Prospecive OBSERVational Munich Interventional MITRAl-Valve Registry
Recruiting NCT03242642 - Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement With the Medtronic Intrepid™ TMVR System in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation. N/A
Recruiting NCT02961647 - Hemodynamic Stress Test in Severe Mitral Regurgitation (HEMI) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02302872 - Treatment of Heart Failure and Associated Functional Mitral Valve Regurgitation N/A
Completed NCT01777815 - Safety and Performance Study of the NeoChord Device N/A
Withdrawn NCT00428103 - Effects of Mitral Valve Repair With the Geoform Ring on Cardiomyopathy N/A
Completed NCT04351984 - Transcatheter Mitral Valvuloplasty Pilot Study
Withdrawn NCT02722551 - CardiAQ-Edwards™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) Study Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT02321514 - Expanded Clinical Study of the Tendyne Mitral Valve System N/A
Recruiting NCT02245763 - STS/ACC TVT Registry Mitral Module
Active, not recruiting NCT01740583 - Mitralign Percutaneous Annuloplasty System for Chronic Functional Mitral Valve Regurgitation N/A
Completed NCT00800046 - A Study of Percutaneous Repair of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Using the Ancora Heart, Inc. AccuCinch® Ventricular Repair System - The CINCH-2 Study N/A
Completed NCT00415701 - Effect of Etomidate on Hemodynamics and Adrenocortical Function After Cardiac Surgery Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03908983 - OPtimisation of Surgical Repair for Treating Insufficiency of the MItral Valve - Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation N/A
Recruiting NCT04818502 - Real World Study of the Tendyne™ Mitral Valve System to Treat Mitral Regurgitation
Terminated NCT03285724 - Safety and Performance Study of the Harpoon Mitral Valve Repair System N/A
Recruiting NCT04195984 - Mi-thos® Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04281940 - Chordal Repair for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVr) N/A