Miscarriage in First Trimester Clinical Trial
— MISO200Official title:
Comparison Between 400 µg or 200 µg of Misoprostol for Cervical Dilatation in 1st Trimester Miscarriage - A Clinical Trial
Verified date | April 2021 |
Source | Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Local current protocol for cervical ripening in 1st trimester miscarriage recommends 400 µg of misoprostol intravaginally 3 hours before uterine evacuation. This regime has been recommended by some international guidelines . So far, there are no recent studies comparing cervical dilatation between 400 µg of misoprostol and a reduced dose (e.g., 200 µg) for 6 hours. If cervical ripening is similar between these two regimens(i.e., 200µg regimen is not inferior to 400µg regimen), costs reductions and lower side effects may be issued without losing quality of cervix dilatation.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 211 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | October 19, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All patients admitted at the Gynecological emergency Unit at Hospital de ClĂnicas de Porto Alegre scheduled for uterine evacuation with <12 weeks of gestation. Exclusion Criteria: - patients who do not wish to participate in the project; - patients with ectopic pregnancy; - patients with comorbidities (heart failure congestive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); - patients with hypovolemic shock; - patients with cervical incompetence; - patients with infected miscarriage/abortion (presence of fever, pus from the cervix, leukocytosis [> 14000]); - patients with twin pregnancy; - patients with Marfan syndrome; - patients allergic to misoprostol; - patients with coagulopathy; - patients with opening of cervical internal os (4 mm of dilatation at the time of consultation); - patients with previous surgery of the cervix (conization); - patients with concomitant use of IUDs. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | HCPA | Porto Alegre | RS |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre |
Brazil,
ACOG Committee Opinion. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 283, May 2003. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):1049-50. — View Citation
Blanchard K, Clark S, Winikoff B, Gaines G, Kabani G, Shannon C. Misoprostol for women's health: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):316-32. Review. — View Citation
Kapp N, Lohr PA, Ngo TD, Hayes JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;(2):CD007207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007207.pub2. Review. — View Citation
Marret H, Simon E, Beucher G, Dreyfus M, Gaudineau A, Vayssière C, Lesavre M, Pluchon M, Winer N, Fernandez H, Aubert J, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Jonville-Bera AP, Clouqueur E, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garrigue A, Pierre F; Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français. Overview and expert assessment of off-label use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology: review and report by the Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 31. Review. — View Citation
National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management in Early Pregnancy of Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage. London: RCOG; 2012 Dec. — View Citation
Tang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Pain Score (VAS) | Pain scores were assessed using a verbal analog scale (VAS), ranging from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) | before Manual Vacuum Aspiration | |
Primary | Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration | this outcome identifies patients that had to have a mechanical dilator for opening the cervix to perform appropriate Manual Vacuum Aspiration | baseline at initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With =8 mm of Dilation | This outcome measures how many mm of dilation the cervical canal has before the procedure. Cervical permeability (=8 mm of dilation, used as a cut-off) was measured using Karman cannulas, from higher to low diameter. | Baseline before Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05516810 -
The Accuracy of Ultrasound Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Moles
|
||
Completed |
NCT06262373 -
Angular Pregnancy - Ultrasound Definition and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06452719 -
Letrozole and Misoprostol for Early Pregnancy Loss Management: A Prospective Pilot Cohort Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06384144 -
Machine Learning Miscarriage Management Clinical Decision Support Tool Study
|