Neuromodulation of Memory in Aging

Mild Cognitive Impairment Clinical Trial

— TMS-AD  

Official title:

Adaptive Neuromodulation of Working Memory Networks in Aging and Dementia

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05460468
• Other study ID #: Pro00110872
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 28, 2024
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2027

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Duke University
• Contact: Simon W Davis, PhD
• Phone: 9196841243
• Email: simon.davis[@]duke.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The proposed research will use closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) based on individualized brain networks to establish parameters that can reliably control brain states. This will be tested in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cohorts. The investigators will study network activation and neural oscillatory mechanisms underlying the network that regulates working memory and then target this network using closed-loop TMS to the Prefrontal Cortex. Investigators will measure the impact of TMS on working memory performance and task-based neural activity. The project will use brain stimulation and network modeling techniques to enhance working memory in healthy older adults and MCI and will demonstrate the value of closed-loop, network-guided TMS for future clinical applications.

Description:

Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading public health concern in the US with enormous care costs and no effective pharmacotherapy despite multiple clinical trials. Multiple studies have shown mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to be a precursor risk for AD and to be more amenable to intervention. While preclinical studies have shown that directly modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can modulate cognitive function in healthy older adults, there is little evidence of reliable efficacy in MCI. The investigators posit three reasons for this lack of efficacy. First, there is no established means of estimating a reliable biomarker and unique dose-response relationship between TMS intensity and brain activity. Second, standard TMS protocols fail to capture the dynamic nature of cognitive states and the reaction of endogenous brain states to exogenous neuromodulation. Third, no studies using TMS in AD-related populations have accounted for the influence of cerebrovascular disease in the response to TMS. The investigators propose to address these shortcomings by using closed-loop TMS, based on individualized brain networks to establish parameters that can reliably control brain states during normal memory functioning in healthy aging and MCI. To achieve this goal, the investigators will study network activation and neural oscillatory mechanisms underlying the network that regulates working memory (WM), a cognition function with a reliable prefrontal cortex (PFC) network characterization. The investigators will then target this network using closed-loop TMS to the PFC and measure the impact on WM performance and task-based neural activity. This approach uses concurrent TMS-fMRI to identify dose-response relationships in the working memory network. Next, the investigators apply novel closed-loop TMS to perturb this network using temporally-precise TMS-EEG. Lastly, the investigators will integrate information collected via fMRI and EEG into a single computational framework to model spatiotemporal dynamics of the global brain network and predict the success of the TMS-related response in our MCI cohort. The project will use cutting-edge brain stimulation and network modeling techniques to enhance WM in healthy older adults and MCI and will provide a demonstration of the value of closed-loop, network-guided TMS for future clinical applications.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 150
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2027
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2027
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 60 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• English Speaking
• Willing to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of any Axis I DSM-V disorder, excluding major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorders
• Current history of substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine)
• Intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes), cardiac pacemakers, or vagus Nerve stimulation device
• Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for = 5 minutes.
• Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; fainting, cerebral aneurysm, Dementia, Hungtington chorea; Multiple Sclerosis.
• Current use of medications known to lower the seizure threshold and/or affect working memory

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cognitive Dysfunction
• MCI
• Mild Cognitive Impairment

Intervention

Device:
• Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive procedure that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain to improve a variety of cognitive conditions, and to probe the dynamics of normal brain function.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Duke University Hospital	Durham	North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Duke University	National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Working Memory Task	The difference in memory accuracy between TMS conditions (random vs. ordered vs. sham stimulation) on a working memory task. Each trial of the task consists of stimulus presentation of an array of letters, a delay period in which subjects alphabetize the letters, and probe period where subjects indicate whether the number corresponds to the alphabetized position of the letter probe presented. Memory is subsequently assessed as a function of TMS condition.	Collected during TMS-EEG (Day 4)
Primary	Functional network connectivity	Functional network connectivity/activity is estimated by comparing the hemodynamic time courses of two or more regions of the brain. The correlation between the time courses of each pair of regions is termed functional network connectivity. The Working Memory Network (WMN) is identified by comparing fMRI-based functional network connectivity for high vs low working memory load (e.g., remembering 4 versus 3 items).	Collected during the initial neuroimaging session (Day 2)
Primary	Vascular density (VAD)	This measure of neurovascular brain health, vascular density (VAD), as estimated by an automated method of segmenting veins with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence known as susceptibility weighted imaging. This measure can be used to estimate the dilation of cerebral veins, and therefore VAD.	Collected during the second neuroimaging session (Day 3)
Primary	EEG-based connectivity	EEG data will be source reconstructed to a fine-grained grid and timecourses of the solution points are averaged per region and per subject. The imaginary part of the coherence (iCoh) of averaged EEG source signals will be assessed within the alpha and theta frequency bands to build EEG-based connectivity matrices ("connectomes") for alpha- and theta-based connectivity, for each subject.	Collected during TMS-EEG (Day 4)
Secondary	Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)	The MoCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. This widespread tool is used to assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The principle outcome measure is a summary score combining performance on each subtest. Scores range from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates intact cognitive functions.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognitive Battery	The primary outcome measure of the NIH Toolbox is a Crystallized or Fluid Intelligence score. Fluid intelligence involves comprehension, reasoning and problem solving, while crystallized intelligence involves recalling stored knowledge and past experiences. These scores are normalized and scaled to reflect a 1-100 range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-2)	The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R) consists of memorization of a list of words to test the ability to recall immediately after memorization (immediate recall) and after a 20-minute delay (delayed recall). These scores are normalized to reflect a 1-100 percentile range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT-R)	The BVMT-R is a commonly used assessment tool to measure visuospatial learning and memory. A visual display of six simple figures arranged in a 2 × 3 matrix is shown to participants for three consecutive 10-second trials. Scoring of the immediate and delayed recall as well as copy trials are based on the accuracy of the drawings and the location of the figures. These scores are normalized to reflect a 1-100 percentile range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	Number Span Forwards/ Backwards	Span tests measure the ability of a subject to remember a series of numbers in forward or reverse order. These scores are normalized to reflect a 1-100 percentile range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	Category & Phonemic Verbal Fluency	Fluency tests measure the participant's ability to generate new exemplars for each categorical (e.g., farm animals) or phonemic (e.g., words starting with "b") prompts. The number of exemplars generated is recorded as the primary outcome for this test. These scores are normalized to reflect a 1-100 percentile range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)
Secondary	Trail Making Test	The purpose of the "Trails" test is to gauge the ability of the participant to trace paths between a series of letters and numbers on a sheet of paper, and can provide insights into a person's cognitive function based on how fast they can search, scan, and process visual information. These scores are normalized to reflect a 1-100 percentile range. Higher scores indicate better performance.	Collected during the initial screening visit (Day 1)