Clinical Trials Logo

Midazolam clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Midazolam.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04602845 Completed - Clinical trials for Sedation Complication

Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation and Midazolam Sedation in Dental Patients

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Remimazolam Tosilate is a new short-acting benzodiazepines used in sedation. It has the advantages of rapid metabolism, quick recovery without injection pain. This study aims to compared with Midazolam, study whether Remimazolam Tosilate can achieve the same sedation effect with lower side effects on sedation maintenance period, During the recovery period of anesthesia, can Remimazolam Tosilatebe more stable and rapid.

NCT ID: NCT04068948 Completed - Clinical trials for Dental Caries in Children

Comparing Pediatric Dental Oral Sedation Outcomes With and Without Meperidine in Children Aged 3-7 Years

Start date: June 25, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the effects of oral sedation using midazolam and hydroxyzine with and without meperidine (a narcotic) on sedation outcomes in pediatric dental patients undergoing dental treatment at the University of Washington Center for Pediatric Dentistry. Procedural sedation can be offered as an option for dental treatment for a young, potentially uncooperative pediatric patient to safely and effectively complete dental restorative needs. Both sedation regimens are already regularly used for patients at the UW CPD. The goal of this study is to assess if removing a narcotic from the regimen will produce the same behavioral success outcomes as a regimen with a narcotic. Our hypothesis is that patients who receive oral sedation using midazolam, hydroxyzine, and meperidine will experience fewer behavioral failures than those who receive oral sedation using midazolam and hydroxyzine without meperidine. The secondary objective of this project is to evaluate the relationship between child temperament and sedation outcome in each treatment group.

NCT ID: NCT03639428 Completed - Midazolam Clinical Trials

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of MDZ028

MIDAZOLAM
Start date: June 23, 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Plasma concentration data were collected from 37 paedriatic patients and 12 healthy adults recruited in a single dose, open-label phase II pharmacokinetic study and in a single dose, randomised, open-label two-peiod crossover bioavailability study, respectively. Data were analysed using non-linear mixed effect modeling.

NCT ID: NCT03397069 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Midazolam Additive to Local Anesthetic in Peribulbar Block

Start date: January 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Regional eye blocks are usually preferred for ophthalmic procedures. Peribulbar block (PBB) is a safe alternative for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Many studies tried to solve this issue by means of prolonging the duration of action of the local anesthetics used. Several drugs were tried as adjuncts to local anesthetics, and their effects have been studied. Midazolam added to the list of adjuvant used in the subarachnoid or epidural block can produce analgesia, probably mediated by the benzodiazepine-Gamma Amino-Butyric Acid(GABA) receptor complex. The investigators hypothesized that the addition of midazolam to lidocaine will improve the quality of the peribulbar block; fasten the onset and prolonging its anesthetic and analgesic duration.

NCT ID: NCT03030911 Completed - Clinical trials for Mechanical Ventilation

Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam on Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine on resting energy expenditure in relation to the midazolam in critically ill patients using indirect calorimetry

NCT ID: NCT01256866 Recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: Midazolam Versus Dexmedetomidine

Start date: November 2010
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare the safety and efficacy of two strategies for sedation of critically ill patients submitted to mechanical ventilation: continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus intravenous bolus of midazolam. The two groups will be compared as to the incidence of of delirium, evaluated with the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) and the percentage of time within the target sedation using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAAS).Eligible patients will be 18 years or older intubated and mechanically ventilated for less than 48 hours prior to start of study drug and anticipated ventilation duration of at least 48 hours. Calculated sample size is 146 patients (73 patients in each group)