Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Physical Activity |
measured using step counts recorded with an analog pedometer, self-reported to the Nurse AMIE platform by the participant each day |
Daily for 90 days |
|
Other |
Usability as measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Ease of use of the Nurse AMIE for Echo Show platform will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Each of the 10 items on this scale are rated from 0 to 4. Items are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of the usability. SUS scores range from 0 to 100, with the higher score indicating better ease of use. |
month 3 |
|
Other |
Usability as measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Ease of use of the Nurse AMIE for Echo Show platform will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Each of the 10 items on this scale are rated from 0 to 4. Items are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of the usability. SUS scores range from 0 to 100, with the higher score indicating better ease of use. |
month 6 |
|
Other |
App Quality measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale (U-MARS) |
Ease of use of the Nurse AMIE for Echo Show platform measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale (U-MARS). Each item is rated from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent). Items are summed to give subscores of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, Information. These subscores can be averaged to give an app quality score. Further, there are two additional scores, the subjective quality and app-specific scores that are used to assess the participant's view of the quality of the app and the impact of the app on knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and change in target health behavior, respectively. The higher the score, the more favorable the app quality is. |
month 3 |
|
Other |
App Quality measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale (U-MARS) |
Ease of use of the Nurse AMIE for Echo Show platform measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale (U-MARS). Each item is rated from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent). Items are summed to give subscores of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, Information. These subscores can be averaged to give an app quality score. Further, there are two additional scores, the subjective quality and app-specific scores that are used to assess the participant's view of the quality of the app and the impact of the app on knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and change in target health behavior, respectively. The higher the score, the more favorable the app quality is. |
month 6 |
|
Other |
Comprehensive Symptom Assessment measured with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) |
The PG-SGA is a self-report assessment of symptoms related to cancer and its treatment. This checklist allows clinical care teams to understand the symptom burden that a participant is experiencing. Symptoms are assigned values with low values (e.g., 0) being the lowest symptom burden (favorable). |
Weekly over a 3 month (90 day) intervention period |
|
Primary |
Feasibility - the proportion of patients who interact with the tablet for at least one month |
The proportion of women who consent, take a tablet home, who actually interact with the Nurse AMIE platform at least 30 out of 90 possible days |
90 days |
|
Primary |
Acceptability - the proportion of patients who agree to participate |
The proportion of women who agree to participate among those deemed eligible and cleared by oncologist. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Physical Function: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) |
The SPPB is an accumulation of balance tests, 4-meter gait speed, and 5-chair stands. Based on the time needed to complete the chair stands, a score is given. A summation of scores from all tests is taken, ranging from 0 -12. A higher score = Higher physical function. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Physical Function: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) |
The SPPB is an accumulation of balance tests, 4-meter gait speed, and 5-chair stands. Based on the time needed to complete the chair stands, a score is given. A summation of scores from all tests is taken, ranging from 0 -12. A higher score = Higher physical function. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Physical Function: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) |
The SPPB is an accumulation of balance tests, 4-meter gait speed, and 5-chair stands. Based on the time needed to complete the chair stands, a score is given. A summation of scores from all tests is taken, ranging from 0 -12. A higher score = Higher physical function. |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Health-Related Quality of Life measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) |
The SF-36 measures quality of life in the following domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being, social functioning, pain, and general health. All items are scored from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest level of functioning possible. Items are averaged to give ratings on each of 8 dimensions. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Health-Related Quality of Life measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) |
The SF-36 measures quality of life in the following domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being, social functioning, pain, and general health. All items are scored from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest level of functioning possible. Items are averaged to give ratings on each of 8 dimensions. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Health-Related Quality of Life measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) |
The SF-36 measures quality of life in the following domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being, social functioning, pain, and general health. All items are scored from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest level of functioning possible. Items are averaged to give ratings on each of 8 dimensions. |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Sleep Quality and Sleep Problems |
measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Sleep Quality and Sleep Problems |
measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Sleep Quality and Sleep Problems |
measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Well-being measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B+4) |
This measure is specific to patients with breast cancer and measures well-being in several domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The items are rated from 0 to 4, and total scores for each domain are the sums of the items (0 being low well-being). The total FACT-B score is the sum of the domains, with scores ranging from 0 to 148, with 148 being the highest level of well-being possible. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Well-being measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B+4) |
This measure is specific to patients with breast cancer and measures well-being in several domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The items are rated from 0 to 4, and total scores for each domain are the sums of the items (0 being low well-being). The total FACT-B score is the sum of the domains, with scores ranging from 0 to 148, with 148 being the highest level of well-being possible. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Well-being measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B+4) |
This measure is specific to patients with breast cancer and measures well-being in several domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The items are rated from 0 to 4, and total scores for each domain are the sums of the items (0 being low well-being). The total FACT-B score is the sum of the domains, with scores ranging from 0 to 148, with 148 being the highest level of well-being possible. |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Distress measured using the Penn State Cancer Institute Distress Inventory |
The PSCI Distress Inventory is a 5-item questionnaire, which measures distress associated with: practical problems, family problems, emotional problems, spiritual religious concerns, and physical problems. The responses are rated from 0 (no distress) to 10 (severe distress). |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Distress measured using the Penn State Cancer Institute Distress Inventory |
The PSCI Distress Inventory is a 5-item questionnaire, which measures distress associated with: practical problems, family problems, emotional problems, spiritual religious concerns, and physical problems. The responses are rated from 0 (no distress) to 10 (severe distress). |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Distress measured using the Penn State Cancer Institute Distress Inventory |
The PSCI Distress Inventory is a 5-item questionnaire, which measures distress associated with: practical problems, family problems, emotional problems, spiritual religious concerns, and physical problems. The responses are rated from 0 (no distress) to 10 (severe distress). |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Pain Severity and Pain Interference measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) |
The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score. The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from 0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad as you can imagine, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven sub-items are rated from 0, does not interfere, to 10, completely interferes, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Pain Severity and Pain Interference measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) |
The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score. The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from 0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad as you can imagine, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven sub-items are rated from 0, does not interfere, to 10, completely interferes, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Pain Severity and Pain Interference measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) |
The BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score. The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from 0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad as you can imagine, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven sub-items are rated from 0, does not interfere, to 10, completely interferes, and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. |
month 6 |
|
Secondary |
Fatigue measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) |
The BFI is a nine-item measure, with scores ranging from 0 being best/no fatigue, and 10 being fatigue as bad as imaginable. A global fatigue score is calculated as an average of the nine items. |
baseline |
|
Secondary |
Fatigue measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) |
The BFI is a nine-item measure, with scores ranging from 0 being best/no fatigue, and 10 being fatigue as bad as imaginable. A global fatigue score is calculated as an average of the nine items. |
month 3 |
|
Secondary |
Fatigue measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) |
The BFI is a nine-item measure, with scores ranging from 0 being best/no fatigue, and 10 being fatigue as bad as imaginable. A global fatigue score is calculated as an average of the nine items. |
month 6 |
|