View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:Patients with a BRAF mutated melanoma are usually treated in France by a first line of immunotherapy followed by a second line that combines a BRAF inhibitor (dabrafenib, vemurafenib, encorafenib) and a MEK inhibitor (trametinib, cobimetinib, binimetinib). The combination dabrafenib/trametinib is initially very efficient but it is unfortunately limited because acquired resistances usually occur after a year of treatment. Patients who become resistant to dabrafenib/trametinib and immunotherapy, unfortunately do not have an approved effective treatment at their disposal. They usually receive a palliative chemotherapy by dacarbazine or fotemustine, and they have a mean overall survival that is less than three months. Activation of autophagy in presence of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is a known mechanism of resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Hydroxychloroquine is an autophagy inhibitor and it has been suggested in vitro that it could decrease resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Following the positive results in 2018 of a phase I/II study in the USA that showed the efficacy and the absence of toxicity of the association of Dabrafenib, Trametinib and hydroxychloroquine when used as a first line treatement, we proposed to our patients who had become resistant to the dabrafenib/trametinib combination, to pursue their treatment beyond progression and to receive in addition hydroxychloroquine. This prescription was initiated in patients for whom no further therapeutic options were available, after validation by a multidisciplinary tumor board. All patients were informed that the combination dabrafenib/trametinib/hydroxychloroquine was not approved by a regulatory agency.
This early phase I trial tests the use of a radioactive tracer (a drug that is visible during an imaging test) known as 18F-FMAU, for imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with brain cancer or cancer that has spread to the brain (brain metastases). A PET/CT scan is an imaging test that uses a small amount of radioactive tracer (given through the vein) to take detailed pictures of areas inside the body where the tracer is taken up. 18F-FMAU may also help find the cancer and how far the disease has spread. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a type of imaging test used to diagnose brain tumors. 18F-FMAU PET/CT in addition to MRI may make the finding and diagnosing of brain tumor easier.
CMP-001-010 is a Phase 2 study of CMP-001 intratumoral (IT) and nivolumab intravenous (IV) administered to participants with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The primary objective of the study is to determine confirmed objective response with CMP-001 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The secondary objectives are to: - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of CMP-001 administered by intratumoral (IT) injection in combination with nivolumab in subjects with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma. - To evaluate the efficacy of CMP-001 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma. - To assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CMP-001 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma. - To assess and describe the immunogenicity of CMP-001 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with refractory unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
This prospective randomized non-inferiority study is designed to compare the rate and severity of complications after axillary and inguinal lymph node dissection in stage III melanoma patients in a study group where the drain is left in place for three weeks and a control group consisting of patients managed according to the standard institutional protocol. Furthermore, variables associated with complications will be examined.
This is a prospective, multi-centred cohort study whereby the EUNASS Study questionnaire will be administered electronically to identify needs of melanoma survivors, the extent to which these needs are being met, and identify areas which have the greatest need for development. It will also evaluate behaviour in relation to sun protection and skin self-examination (SSE). It will be a self-completed questionnaire. Qualitative work using semi-structured interviews will explore the needs of melanoma survivors in greater depth, will present examples of potential interventions to improve SSE and explore factors that determine the likelihood of engaging in an intervention which can address unmet needs, such as improving SSE. Taken together, the data will provide the evidence base to inform the development of an intervention to improve SSE, which can subsequently be tested in secondary care services.
Postoperative complications like seroma formation and wound site infection readily occur following completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for malignant melanoma. We analyzed the impact of time-to-drain removal and drainage volume on seroma formation after ALND.
This study is to compare 2D- and 3D-imaging and routine clinical care in early melanoma detection in a prospective large-scale real-world data set.
This is a single-arm, prospective, interventional study in cancer survivors and patients to examine the feasibility of a mobile health application, Elly (Elly Health Inc.), to reduce levels of anxiety, stress, loneliness, and social isolation. Participants will be given access to the Elly phone application developed by Elly Health Inc. and will be asked to complete questionnaires measuring quality of life at multiple timepoints during the study.
This study investigated the visual and anatomical outcomes, tumor control, tumor recurrence, distant metastasis and cancer free survival in patients affected by uveal melanoma and undergoing Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy between February 2011 and March 2020
Background: The worldwide incidence of skin cancer has been rising for 50 years, in particular the incidence of malignant melanoma has increased approx. 2-7% annually and is the most common cancer amongst Danes aged 15-34. Currently there is a significant amount of misdiagnosis of skin cancer and mole cancer. Our aim is to improve general practitioners' diagnostic skills and accuracy of skin and mole cancer. Research questions: In a population of Danish General Practitioners (GPs) what is the dose/response effect of hours spent with an educational platform that offers AI augmented training and clinical feedback on their diagnostic accuracy and accurate clinical management (treatment, dismissal, referral)? Does access to an educational platform that offers AI augmented training and clinical feedback increase the number of malignant skin lesions referred by Danish GPs without simultaneously increasing the number of incorrect benign referrals? Can the participating GPs clinical accuracy be predicted from the MCQ-score by comparing their quiz answers and diagnostic accuracy on their registered lesions with their score on the MCQ? Method: 90 Danish GPs will at baseline, 1 month and end of trial answer a Multiple Choice Questionnaire (MCQ). There is no change to current clinical practice, but all participating doctors will be asked to register a clinical picture and a dermoscopic image as well as basic information about the lesion and patient (age, gender, location and diagnosis) of all skin lesions examined due to a suspicion for non-melanoma or melanoma skin cancer, raised by the GP or patient. GPs in the intervention group are besides the registration application (R-app) given access to an AI augmented training and clinical feedback through an educational smartphone app (E-app). Within the E-app the doctor can access quizzes on a library of 10,000+ skin lesions, written articles about the 40 most common skin lesions, and a clinical feedback module that gives the GP feedback on their registered skin lesions. Feedback on skin lesions with the registered clinical management of referred/excised/biopsied will be provided continuously by independent experts in skin cancer diagnostics (>10 years of experience) through a web-based review system developed by our group. Feedback on the remaining registered cases are withheld until the end of the study period. This is done to simulate a realistic clinical setting during the study.