View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:This randomized phase II trial studies how well nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab or ipilimumab works as first-line therapy in treating patients with stage IV melanoma that cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as nab-paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Bevacizumab may stop the growth of tumor cells by binding to a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and by preventing the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. Ipilimumab blocks a substance called cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) on the surface of T cells and may help the immune system kill cancer cells. It is not yet known whether nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab is more effective than ipilimumab in treating melanoma.
The purpose of this study is to determine the rate and frequency of high-grade (CTCAE v4.0 Grade 3 or higher), treatment-related, select adverse events in subjects with histologically confirmed stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma and progression post prior treatment containing an anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, treated with Nivolumab (BMS-936558) at a dose of 3 mg/kg every two weeks.
This study will assess the safety of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b (PEG-IFN) as an adjuvant treatment for melanoma.
This observational study will evaluate the effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors and current therapies in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic melanoma with or without BRAF V600 mutation. Patients will be treated per the locally approved therapeutic options in clinical practice. The observation period for each patient will be up to 24 months.
This is an open label, phase I trial, testing the combination of Tremelimumab and MEDI3617 in patients with metastatic melanoma.
The study is a prospective, single-arm, one-site therapeutic trial of the combination of trametinib plus digoxin for advanced melanoma. endpoints are toxicities assessed by nCi CTCae v4.1 within the first 8 weeks, responses measured by ReCiST v1.1 criteria every 8 weeks with scans and exams, tumor sensitivity to the drug combination quantified by tumor regressions in nSG mice, and correlations of response with tumor sensitivity, BRaF status, MaPK inhibitor exposure history, and tumor sodium pump expression. Treatment Dosage and administration Study Drugs: 1. Trametinib (2mg) will be administered orally on a daily basis. 2. Digoxin (0.25mg) will be administered orally on a daily basis. on a 8-week cycle, duration of treatment can last from 8 to 104 weeks. endpoints 1. Toxicities will be assessed via nCi's CTCae v4.1 toxicity criteria. DLTs will be defined based on the rate of drug-related (definitely or probably) grade 3-5 adverse events experienced within the first 8 weeks of study treatment. The MTD will be exceeded if more than 20% of patients on the study experience DLTs. 2. Responses will be measured by ReCiST v1.1 every 8 weeks. Response duration will be defined as time from first documented response until disease progression. PFS is time from treatment until disease progression. 3. Patient tumor sensitivity to the drug combination will be quantified by the amount of subcutaneous established tumor growth inhibition in nSG mice by 5d/week oral gavage with drugs. 4. Tumor nRaS status will be determined by tumor Dna extraction, PCR amplification of exons and Sanger sequencing of nRaS. 5. History of prior MaPK inhibitor therapies will document MeK inhibitor exposures. 6. Sodium pump subunit expression will be analyzed by pretreatment tumor immunohistochemistry and a qualitative 0 to 3+ grading system.
Therapies that target specific molecules markedly inhibit cancer growth in several malignancies, and provide valuable strategies for the treatment of advanced melanoma. In recent years, BRAF and KIT have become established therapeutic targets in melanoma patients showing activating mutations in these oncogenes. However, it is crucial that genetic mutations present in the melanoma lesions are identified if the investigators are to design tailormade therapies for individual patients. The tumour genotypes that determine the selection of molecular-targeted therapies are usually identified in primary tumours; however, primary tumours are not always representative of metastases. Circulating free DNA may be a source of valuable information because it can be obtained via routine blood sampling, it provides real-time information about a patient's current disease state, and it allows monitoring and molecular characterization before and after chemotherapy. The aim of the study is to determine the mutational status in circulating DNA in melanoma metastatic patients, with the Sequenom Mass Array, a next generation sequencing technology. Results obtained before and after treatment will be compared with the primary tumor genotype.
This is a 5-part dose-finding and preliminary efficacy study of pembrolizumab (Pembro) + dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) for participants with advanced melanoma and solid tumors. Parts 1 and 2 are open-label to find and confirm the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) for Pembro+D+T. The primary hypothesis (Parts 1 and 2) is that Pembro+D+T is sufficiently well-tolerated to permit clinical investigation. Part 3 is a double-blind study of Pembro+D+T versus placebo+D+T. The primary study hypothesis (Part 3 only) is that the Pembro+D+T improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo+D+T. Part 4 is nonrandomized and open-label and is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability and identify the MTD or MAD of Pembro+T in participants who have v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 [BRAF] mutation-negative (without V600 E or K) melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status]. The primary hypothesis (Part 4) is that Pembro+T is sufficiently well-tolerated to permit clinical investigation. Part 5 will confirm the dose(s) identified in Part 4 in participants BRAF wild type [without V600E or K] melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status] and will further evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) of Pembro+T in participants who have BRAF wild type [without V600E or K] melanoma or solid tumors [irrespective of BRAF status]. The primary hypotheses (Part 5) are that Pembro+T is sufficiently well-tolerated at the MTD/MAD to permit further clinical investigation and is effective in attaining objective responses based upon Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by Investigator review in participants who have melanoma without BRAF V600 E or K mutations. With Amendment 5 (21-Mar-2019), the Part 5 expansion cohort will not be pursued following the completion of Part 5 dose confirmation. Parts 1 and 2 of the study may also explore, if needed based on tolerability, the backup combinations of open-label Pembro+T (for BRAF mutation-negative participants) or Pembro+D (for BRAF mutation-positive participants). These will run concurrently with the Pembro+D+T arm.
This phase II trial studies the effect of a vaccine called CDX-1401 given with or without a biologic drug called CDX-301 in treating patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma. The cancer vaccine CDX-1401 attaches to a protein that is made in tumor cells. The vaccine helps the body recognize the tumor to fight the cancer. The biologic drug CDX-301 may help the body make more of the tumor fighting cells, known as dendritic cells. Another biologic drug, poly-ICLC, may stimulate the immune system and help these dendritic cells mature so that they can recognize the tumor. Giving CDX-301 may make the immune response to a combination of CDX-1401 and poly-ICLC better.
This pilot clinical trial studies the feasibility of a telephone-based educational intervention in improving communication between patients with stage 0-III cancer and their children. An educational program delivered by telephone may help parents talk with their school-age child about their cancer.