View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:Individuals who are affected with pancreas cancer and melanoma as well as those without either cancer who have been identified as 1st or 2nd degree relatives of family members with pancreas cancer and melanoma will be asked to participate. The participant will be asked to complete a survey about their health and family history of cancer and to give a blood sample for specific gene testing and storage for future research studies.The overall goal of this study is to understand the factors that increase susceptibility and expression of pancreatic cancer and melanoma in high risk families.
Checkpoint inhibitors like the PD-1 antibodies Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab represent standard of care for patients with metastasized melanoma. Numerous high quality studies demonstrate that endurance and resistance training in cancer patients is safe and elicits beneficial effects. However, there is no systematic experience with regard to exercise interventions in patients undergoing checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Therefore, the Sportivumab Study aimed to investigate safety, feasibility and effectivity of a 12 week combined resistance and endurance exercise intervention program during checkpoint inhibitor treatment. It is planned to enroll 40 patients. Participants will be randomized into an experimental and a wait-list control group (20 per group). The wait-list control group will receive the exercise intervention program after week 13 of enrollment.
Melanoma is the most dangerous skin cancer and is becoming commoner, largely due to increased foreign holidays and use of sun-beds. Melanoma usually begins as a new or changing mole. If it is picked-up quickly enough it can be removed in a simple operation and effectively cured. GPs can do this operation and many are highly experienced and skilled in minor skin surgery. However, guidelines written by hospital specialists insist that all patients who might have a melanoma should not be treated by GPs, but should be referred to hospital. This contrasts with Australia, where melanoma is commoner and initial treatment by GPs is standard practice. This creates several potential problems. First, melanoma can be difficult to diagnose. Many moles that do not look concerning based on checklists do turn out to be melanoma, and the opposite frequently occurs too, moles that look worrying at initial examination are not melanoma. Second, people are becoming more skin aware and GPs are checking moles much more often. Sensibly many of these patients are being sent to hospital for a check, although most will not have melanoma. Third, as a result hospital skin clinics and minor surgery lists are becoming very busy and waiting times are ever increasing. Fourth, the many people who have a melanoma that is not clinically obvious are waiting an increasingly long time to have it diagnosed and treated in hospital, and this could actually mean that melanoma has more chance to spread while they wait. The investigators conducted studies on 1200 people diagnosed with a melanoma in Northeast Scotland between 1991 and 2008 and found that 20% of these people had had their melanoma diagnosed and first treated by their GP. These patients were no more likely to receive improper treatment than those that had been referred to hospital. Also people who had had their melanoma cut out by a GP were no more likely to die from melanoma, and they actually required less hospital visits afterward. This suggests that the guidelines could be changed to allow GPs to treat suspicious moles. The investigators think this will be better for patients and the NHS in the long-run. However, the investigators cannot recommend changes to the guidelines on the basis of local research. For this reason, the investigators wish to extend the study using data from 18,000 patients diagnosed with melanoma from across Scotland. The results of this inclusive study will inform how the health service should deal with the growing problem of suspicious moles in the future.
This is a medical chart review of ipilimumab treatment after nivolumab treatment in melanoma in Japan
This study is a real-world retrospective claims analysis to assess and compare AE-related HCRU and medical costs among patients with different follow-up frequency after initiating a melanoma therapy.
The aim of the study is to examine the potentials of involving patients with metastatic melanoma in their own care planning through systematic use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). Furthermore, to examine the outcome of health-related quality of life, self-efficacy and impact on the patient-physician interaction. Patients (N=282) will be included from three highly specialized hospitals in Denmark. At one hospital patients will complete PROM before each consultation during a year (intervention group). At the two other hospitals patients will not complete PROM (control group). In addition to baseline, measurements will take place after three, six and 12 months. The project is organized and executed with patient involvement in the research process.
The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of the study drug, PF-06688992. Before this study, PF-06688992 has never been given to people. PF-06688992 is a targeted therapy for people with cancer. The investigators linked a chemotherapy drug to an antibody (protein found in the blood). The antibody will connect to GD3 which is found on most melanomas but on very few other cells in the body. The investigators hope that in this way, it will deliver this chemotherapy directly to the melanoma and not to normal tissues.
This is a phase 1b study for patients with metastatic (cancer has spread to various parts of the body) melanoma and ovarian cancer. The main purpose is to examine the safety and efficacy of administering pembrolizumab after receiving chemotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and low dose interleukin 2 (IL-2). Patients will first receive either cyclophosphamide, or cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. These are chemotherapy agents that prepare the body to receive TILs. Patients are then infused with autologous TILs, a type of white blood cell that recognizes tumor cells and enters them, thereby causing tumor cells to break down. Following TILs infusion, patients will receive low-dose IL-2 therapy. This is a type of protein that is intended to activate and stimulate the growth of cells in the patient's immune system. If the patient meets the required criteria, they will be given pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody (drug made up of cloned immune cells) that is designed to block a protein called programed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) which will allow the body's immune system to kill the cancer cells.
Since 2013, therapeutic care of metastatic melanoma (MM) has greatly improved, especially thanks to BRAF and MEK targeted therapies. The efficacy of these treatments that are now used daily at first line for BRAF mutated MM is widely approved. Their toxicities, in monotherapy or in association, are also well-known: fever, arthralgias, digestive disorders, cutaneous rash, fatigue, photosensitivity, alopecia, cutaneous hyperkeratosis, squamous cell carcinomas, keratoacanthomas, de novo melanomas… However, onco-dermatologists are more and more faced with MM of elderly patients. Indeed, life expectancy continues to increase and the over-75-year-old age group is becoming larger. These patients are still active but much more vulnerable. Nevertheless, there is no data in the literature for this fragile population except the MM pivotal studies subgroups of those over 65-year-old. The results vary with different regimens. Therefore, there is a wide lack of information that could help make a therapeutic decision, inform patients, prevent or treat side effects of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in elderly patients
The purpose of this study is to determine if TBI-1401(HF10) in combination with ipilimumab is effective in Japanese patients with stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable or metastatic melanoma.