View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common type of cancer inside the eyes of adults. Almost half of all patients diagnosed with UM will eventually develop metastases. Once metastases occur, the median patient survival is short. In this trial, we will test if treatment with Melatonin after primary tumor diagnosis can prevent or delay the development of metastases. 100 patients diagnosed with primary UM will be randomized to either treatment with Melatonin tablets (20 mg at night), or to a control group. Both groups will be followed for 5 years. At 5 years, the number of patients that have developed metastases in the Melatonin and control groups will be compared (primary outcome measure).
A Phase 1B/2A study will be conducted to establish safety and dose level of AMXT 1501 dicaprate in combination with IV DFMO, in cancer patients.
The primary aim of the study is to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 225Ac-MTI-201 in participants with metastatic uveal melanoma. The secondary aims are to describe the pharmacokinetics of 225Ac-MTI-201 and the toxic effects of 225Ac-MTI-201 in participants with metastatic uveal melanoma.
Participants in this study will have Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography/MSOT imaging of both breasts immediately before their ultrasound-guided breast biopsy procedure begins. After the MSO imaging is completed, participation in the study will end.
In this open label phase II trial combination therapy with the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab and the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab will be investigated in patients with localized HNSCC who will undergo surgery, advanced or metastatic MSI-H cancer, PD-1 resistant metastatic melanoma, and patients with a locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor who, in the opinion of the investigator, based on available clinical data, may benefit from treatment with anti-PD-L1 and anti-TIGIT immunotherapy.
The present monocentric prospective phase 2 study aims to reproduce the results obtained at NIRS thus offering the possibility of obtaining a promising rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) in patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma of lower genital tract. Systemic treatment with immunotherapy is not the subject of this study but is allowed both in the neoadjuvant and sequential regimens. Melanomas have always been considered poorly radiosensitive. It is now accepted that high LET (Linear Energy Transfer) particle beams, such as carbon ions, can offer a biological advantage, compared to photons treatment, in radio-resistant neoplasms treatment, thanks to their higher biological efficacy (RBE) against tumours with a low α/ ß ratio. In addition, carbon ions have the physical advantage of an inverted depth deposition profile compared to photons, allowing then a steep dose gradients that ensure increased sparing of adjacent healthy organs at risk (OARs).
The study was a single-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chidamide combined with Toripalimab.
A total of 40 subjects who had not received systemic treatment or chemotherapy in the past and were allowed to receive adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for advanced melanoma received tirelizumab combined with dacarbazine for 4-6 cycles to evaluate the efficacy, safety and prognosis of tirelizumab combined with dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced melanoma.
The primary objective of this study, sponsored by Travera Inc. in Massachusetts, is to validate whether the mass response biomarker has potential to predict response of patients to specific therapies or therapeutic combinations using isolated tumor cells from various specimen formats including malignant fluids such as pleural effusions and ascites, core needle biopsies, fine needle aspirates, or resections.
This study is an open, single-center, multi-cohort phase Ib exploratory study, and 50 subjects are planned to be enrolled to observe the objective response rate of each subject. The safety evaluation of this study adopts common terminology criteria for adverse events version (CTCAE) 5.0 to evaluate the adverse events of drugs. Efficacy was evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version (RECIST) 1.1 for immune-based therapeutics criteria.