View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:Early detection of melanoma showed an impact on the thickness of the lesions at the time of diagnosis. One challenge is to improve the modalities. Decrease the rate of non-compliant patients among patients referred to the dermatologist for a suspicious lesion (patients who will never go to the consultation), and reduce the time interval between the first identification of the lesion and the excision allowing the diagnosis are major issues. Direct contact between the general practitioner (GP) and the dermatologist would probably make it possible to shorten the care pathway of patients with lesions justifying excision. The objective is to evaluate whether contacting the dermatologist directly by telephone and e-mailing the photograph of a suspicious melanoma lesion can significantly reduce the time required for access to the consultation for the following patients: (a) referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the GP (b) and having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision (true positives). Expected results: The procedure should shorten the care pathway for patients with melanoma and decrease the proportion of patients who do not consult the dermatologist when they were referred ("non-observing patients"). This should facilitate the identification of thinner lesions. The benefit for the patient is then direct with a survival at 5 years higher. In public health terms, it is expected a benefit as better optimization of resources. In a situation of shortage of professionals, access to the dermatologist should be optimized by optimizing emergency access for patients who require it.
The choice of treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma depends on the status of B-RAF of the tumor: in the absence of mutation, treatment with immunotherapy (currently anti-PD1) is proposed in the first line; When B-RAF is mutated, treatment with targeted therapies is retained: B-RAF and MEK inhibitors are prescribed in combination (vemurafenib + cobimetinib or dabrafenib + trametinib). Patient response rates for targeted therapies range from 50 to 60%, and the occurrence of sometimes severe side effects is not predictable. There are currently no predictive biomarkers of patients' response to targeted therapy molecules. The in vitro evaluation of the intrinsic sensitivity of the cells of patients to different combinations of targeted therapy molecules would make it possible to propose the best therapeutic combinations. The cutaneous metastases are chosen in the model because of easy access to collect tumor tissue. The most relevant in vitro models for mimicking cutaneous melanoma metastases are explant cultures and human skin equivalents.
This study will investigate the safety and tolerability of MAGE-A4ᶜ¹º³²T cell therapy in subjects who have the appropriate HLA-A2 tissue marker and whose urinary bladder, melanoma, head and neck, ovarian, non-small cell lung, esophageal, gastric, synovial sarcoma, or myxoid/round call liposarcoma (MRCLS) tumor has the MAGE-A4 protein expressed. This study will take a subject's T cells and give them a T cell receptor protein that recognizes and attacks the tumors. This study has a substudy component that will investigate the safety and tolerability of MAGE-A4c1032T cell therapy in combination with low dose radiation in up to 10 subjects.
Keynote 695 is Phase 2 study of intratumoral tavokinogene telseplasmid (tavo; pIL-12) Electroporation (EP) plus IV Pembrolizumab. Eligible patients will be those with pathological diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic melanoma who are progressing or have progressed on either pembrolizumab or nivolumab.
Therapeutic agents used in malignant melanoma treatment such as BRAF/MEK inhibitors and anti-CTLA-4/Anti-PD-1 antibodies go along with harmful side effects in a considerable proportion of patients and treatment costs may cause relevant medical expenditures per month. Currently, therapy response assessment in melanoma patients is performed using RECIST criteria which are based on changes in tumour size. PET/CT combines morphological and metabolic information. Thus, the so-called PERCIST-criteria were introduced integrating change in size and glucose utilization for response assessment in solid tumors. Due to the different mechanism of action these new agents introduce different response patterns increase in tumor size due to inflammation for antibody therapies). In conventional chemotherapies, re-staging is usually performed 3 months after treatment initiation which is the result of empirical investigations. Moreover, it has recently been shown, that response to new targeted therapies can be detected much earlier using PET or functional MR techniques. This forms the rationale for the monitoring of melanoma patients using a combined PET/MR technique after only 2 weeks of therapy initiation. Especially for patients in stage IV with a medium survival time of 12 months, a 2.5 months earlier re-staging and therapy adjustment would have significant consequences for the individual clinical course.
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if GSK2636771 given in combination with pembrolizumab can help to control the disease in patients with refractory (has not responded to treatment) metastatic melanoma. The safety of this drug combination will also be studied. This is an investigational study. Pembrolizumab is FDA approved and commercially available and FDA approved for the treatment of several types of cancer, including melanoma. GSK2636771 is not FDA approved or commercially available. It is currently being used for research purposes only. The study doctor can explain how the study drugs are designed to work. Up to 41 participants will be enrolled in this study. All will take part at MD Anderson.
This study will have two phases, with an added usability test after Phase I and before Phase 2. Phase 1: Cognitive Interviews of materials in Spanish. Phase 2: Personalized Genomic Testing for Skin Cancer (PGT-SC). The overarching goal of this study is to learn more about how to maximize the availability, comprehension and appropriate uptake of personalized genomics among different populations in New Mexico. Primary Care patients will be recruited in their primary health clinic to complete surveys about their understanding and beliefs of skin cancer and behaviors that might help prevent skin cancer. 6 out of every 7 patients will then be asked to go to a website to learn more about skin cancer risk. Once participants have completed the education modules on this site, participants will be given the option to request and complete a skin cancer genetic testing kit. All participants will be contacted again after three months to complete a follow-up set of surveys about skin cancer.
A one-arm, single center phase 2 trial of SAbR plus ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced metastatic melanoma patients
This study is a Phase 1-2 open-label dose escalation study of the immuno-activating monoclonal antibody APX005M administered in combination with nivolumab to adult subjects with non-small cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma. The Phase 1 portion is intended to establish the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose of APX005M when administered in combination with nivolumab. The Phase 2 portion of the study will evaluate safety and efficacy of the combination.
This study will help determine whether 2 doses of the combination (ipilimumab + nivolumab) is sufficient for patients with early benefit compared to the usual way of trying to give 4 doses. If patients do not show early benefit after 2 doses, patients will be able to continue with additional ipilimumab + nivolumab, even beyond the standard 4 doses if felt in the best interest of the patient.