View clinical trials related to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effect of two dosing regimens, BID versus TID dosing, of an Exploratory Vehicle (EV) on meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with Demodex lid infestation.
In this randomized clinical trial, patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction aged 50 year and more will be enrolled. The Meibomian gland dysfunction diagnosis will confirmed by a cornea specialist. The enrolled patients will be randomly allocated to the treatment and placebo group. The patients in treatment group will receive topical vitamin D every 6 hours daily (25 Microgram/cc or 1000 IU). The control group will receive the same-shape packed drop without vitamin D. The patients in both group will receive the conventional treatment including hot compress and shampoo scrub. The primary outcome is the change in Ocular surface disease index and 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire score assessed before the topical treatment and every one-months until 3 months. The secondary outcome measures are Tear breakup time, Schirmer test, Corneal fluorescein staining, Meibomian gland expressibility. The grader and the patients will blind to the study group.
To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of TearCare® procedures compared to Restasis® to treat the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease in adult patients.
PURPOSE: The investigators propose a new treatment for refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) patients with plasma jet to remove the hyperkeratinization layer from the lid margin to unblock terminal gland ducts and use thermal stimulation to enhance meibum delivery. METHODS: A prospective, interventional clinical safety and efficacy trial with 25 patients from the Department of Ophthalmology at Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP) to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment of refractory MGD patients with plasma jet on both upper and lower lids. Patients will be submitted to an ophthalmology workup with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (ETDRS chart) and dry eye questionnaires (DEQ-5 and OSDI). Bulbar redness, tear film meniscus height, noninvasive breakup time (NIKBUT), meibography under infrared light will be measured with Keratograph (Oculus®). Following, tear film osmolarity (i-PenTM), meibomian gland expression, and Marx line assessment. All exams were performed at the baseline, 30 days, and 90 days after the plasma jet application.
The modern treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction(MGD) is based on anti-inflammatory drops or oral antibiotics for decreasing dry eye disease (DED) associated inflammation, warm compresses for liquefying the thicker meibum, and lid hygiene for reducing the bacterial overload. But, such treatments have shown limited effectiveness to a large proportion of patients with MGD, due to the multifactorial background of the disease. Thus, alternative approaches aiming at different aspects of the DED pathophysiology are needed. Elimination of posterior lid-margin hyperemia with telangiectasia could be a treatment target for reducing the secretion of inflammatory mediators in the course of MGD. Using the mechanism of photocoagulation via selective thermolysis, laser light could contribute to the destruction of abnormal vessels at the posterior lid-margin and thus, the reduction of inflammation. Recently, sub-threshold (micropulse) laser photocoagulation was introduced in ophthalmology and offers significant clinical advantages compared to conventional continuous wave (CW) approach, preventing laser induced thermal damage and related treatment side effects. This study investigates the effect of sub-threshold (micropulse) laser treatment for dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction combined with increased eyelid margin vascularity.
The purpose of this study is to compare electronic debridement of the eyelid margin (BlephEx) to manual debridement of the eyelid margin as treatment options for patients intolerant to contact lens wear consequent to Meibomian gland dysfunction.
The purpose of this study is to assess the correlation between the thickness of lipid layer and the meibomian gland dysfunction.
This is a Phase IV, single site, randomized, double masked, parallel control clinical trial of 60 subjects to investigate the variance of efficacy between Lotemax® and Zylet® for treatment of ocular surface inflammation due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Efficacy will be measured by in-vivo confocal microscopy, corneal fluorescein staining, grading of meibomian gland dysfunction and validated ocular symptom assessment questionnaire.