Clinical Trials Logo

Medical Errors clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Medical Errors.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04362319 Completed - Depression Clinical Trials

Burnout and Medical Errors in the Anaesthesiology Fraternity During Covid-19 Pandemic

Start date: May 15, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

We plan to perform an observational study to evaluate the prevalence of burnout, depression and medical errors in a designated exclusive Covid-19 patients hospital in Malaysia, during the Covid-19 pandemic. We also seek to assess the relationship between burnout and depression with medical errors. The population studied will be the anaesthesiology fraternity, who are at higher risk to the nature of their work at the frontlines of the pandemic.

NCT ID: NCT03924570 Completed - Medical Errors Clinical Trials

Reducing Adverse Events in Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Argentina

Start date: July 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Introduction: Errors in communication, and during transfers of information and medical responsibility, are frequent and risky. Objectives: Primary: To evaluate the effect of the implementation of the I-PASS® transfer program on the reduction in the frequency of medical attention errors in intensive pediatric therapies in the public hospitals setting. Secondary: 1) Measure the effect of the intervention in increasing the frequency of use of key elements of high quality verbal and written communication during the transfer of patients by health professionals. 2) To explore the effect of the intervention on the culture of patient safety among health professionals who assist pediatric patients in areas of clinical hospitalization. Material and Methods: Design: Staged clinical trial (Stepped Wedge) Duration: 9 months (progressive enrollment of 2 participating units every 2 months). Scope: Pediatric Intensive Care Units Subjects: health professionals involved in transfers in each institution. Intervention: Implementation of a multi-faceted evidence-based transfer package (I-PASS®) that has already been adapted for use in Argentina. The program includes multiple components, including educational training, implementation of a mnemonic verbal and written delivery rule I-PASS®, live observations of transfers to drive continuous improvement of the quality of intervention, through the feedback and a campaign of visual reinforcement materials to ensure sustainability. Events of interest: acceptance of the intervention. Frequency of preventable damages associated with medical care measured with GAPPS® as screening tools. Safety culture survey. Length of the transfer before and after the intervention.

NCT ID: NCT03244033 Completed - Clinical trials for Decision Support Systems, Clinical

Integrating Contextual Factors Into Clinical Decision Support

Start date: September 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Preventing contextual errors requires heightening clinician responsiveness to clues that there are contextual factors during the clinical encounter, in real time. These clues, termed contextual red flags are evident in two sources: the medical record and from patients directly. An effective intervention would prompt clinicians to determine whether there are underlying contextual factors that could be addressed in the care plan, averting contextual error. This desirable process is termed contextual probing. While clinical decision support (CDS) has been used to provide physicians with timely biomedical information at the point of care to prevent errors and promote appropriate care, this technology also affords an opportunity to draw physician attention to both contextual red flags and contextual factors in order to avert contextual errors. This study assesses the potential of "contextualized CDS" to improve contextualization of care through a randomized controlled intervention trial, with assessment measures of both patient health care outcomes and averted costs associated with overuse and misuse of medical services. The three hypotheses are that CDS: 1. Reduces contextual error: CDS tools that inform clinicians of contextual factors and prompt them to explore contextual red flags should result in a reduction in contextual error. 2. Improve health care outcomes: Contextualized CDS predicts improved health care outcomes defined as a partial or full resolution of the contextual red flag (e.g. elevated HgB A1c) after the index visit. 3. Reduces avoidable health care costs: Contextualized CDS is associated with a reduction in misuse and overuse of inappropriate or unnecessary medical services.

NCT ID: NCT01130987 Completed - Medical Errors Clinical Trials

Implementing a Comprehensive Handoff Program to Improve Patient Safety

Start date: July 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators propose to test the hypothesis that implementation of a comprehensive handoff program (CHP) - i.e., implementation of a computerized handoff tool along with teamwork training for internal medicine residents on inpatient units at Walter Reed and Madigan Army Medical Centers - will lead to reductions in resident miscommunications / medical errors and improvements in workflow and experience on the wards.