Mecp2 Duplication Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Rett Syndrome, MECP2 Duplication, and Rett-Related Disorders Consortium, Rare Disease Clinical Research Network: Neurophysiologic Correlates
NCT number | NCT03077308 |
Other study ID # | RDCRN 5212 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | January 2, 2017 |
Est. completion date | July 31, 2021 |
Verified date | August 2021 |
Source | University of Alabama at Birmingham |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The overall purpose of this project is to advance understanding of the neurophysiological features of Rett syndrome (RTT), MECP2 Duplication (MECP2 Dup) and RTT-related disorders (CDKL5, FOXG1) to gain insight into disease pathogenesis, with an emphasis on identifying biomarkers of disease evolution and severity. This specific study is intertwined to the core study Natural History of Rett Syndrome and Related Disorders (RTT5211), which characterizes range of clinical involvement and genotype-phenotype correlations and will provide phenotypical data for determining the clinical relevance of the neurophysiologic parameters; study subjects here are co- and primarily enrolled in RTT5211. The proposed studies will serve as basis of future translational investigations, including further refinement of biomarkers, development of outcome measures, and clinical trials per se.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 185 |
Est. completion date | July 31, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | July 31, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 2 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Individuals with RTT, MECP2 Dup, and RTT-related disorders (mutations or deletions in CDKL5 and FOXG1 genes) who are also enrolled in the RTT5211 Protocol, which collects longitudinal clinical and neurobehavioral data will be linked to the RTT5211 Protocol by their RDCRN identification numbers. No phenotypical selection of subjects will be performed; we expect the cohort will be representative of each disorder. A cohort of 60 typically developing girls and boys (30 each) will be enrolled to serve as controls. Typical development in the control group will be confirmed by normal intelligence quotient scores or equivalent scores on developmental tests using standardized measures and negative psychiatric diagnoses on a standardized diagnostic interview administered to their mothers, fathers or guardians (Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents, Revised: Parents' Version). All control subjects must have a negative history of neurologic impairment or neuropsychiatric conditions and show no clinical evidence of a genetic disorder. Exclusion Criteria: Individuals who do not meet the above criteria will be excluded. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Boston Children's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Cincinnati Children's Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | University of Colorado Denver | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Vanderbilt University | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Alabama at Birmingham | Boston Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), International Rett Syndrome Foundation Rettsyndrome.org, University of Colorado, Denver, University of South Florida, Vanderbilt University |
United States,
17. Wechsler DL (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -III. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
18. Reich MJ, Shayka T, Taibleson C (1991) The Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents-Revised. St Louis: Washington University Press.
Bebbington A, Anderson A, Ravine D, Fyfe S, Pineda M, de Klerk N, Ben-Zeev B, Yatawara N, Percy A, Kaufmann WE, Leonard H. Investigating genotype-phenotype relationships in Rett syndrome using an international data set. Neurology. 2008 Mar 11;70(11):868-75. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304752.50773.ec. — View Citation
Blackman MP, Djukic B, Nelson SB, Turrigiano GG. A critical and cell-autonomous role for MeCP2 in synaptic scaling up. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13529-36. — View Citation
Brown MW 3rd, Porter BE, Dlugos DJ, Keating J, Gardner AB, Storm PB Jr, Marsh ED. Comparison of novel computer detectors and human performance for spike detection in intracranial EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;118(8):1744-52. Epub 2007 Jun 1. — View Citation
Chao HT, Zoghbi HY, Rosenmund C. MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):58-65. — View Citation
Cuddapah VA, Pillai RB, Shekar KV, Lane JB, Motil KJ, Skinner SA, Tarquinio DC, Glaze DG, McGwin G, Kaufmann WE, Percy AK, Neul JL, Olsen ML. Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) mutation type is associated with disease severity in Rett syndrome. J Med Genet. 2014 Mar;51(3):152-8. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-102113. Epub 2014 Jan 7. — View Citation
D'Cruz JA, Wu C, Zahid T, El-Hayek Y, Zhang L, Eubanks JH. Alterations of cortical and hippocampal EEG activity in MeCP2-deficient mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2010 Apr;38(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 4. — View Citation
Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21. — View Citation
Deregnier RA, Nelson CA, Thomas KM, Wewerka S, Georgieff MK. Neurophysiologic evaluation of auditory recognition memory in healthy newborn infants and infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr. 2000 Dec;137(6):777-84. — View Citation
Gandal MJ, Edgar JC, Ehrlichman RS, Mehta M, Roberts TP, Siegel SJ. Validating ? oscillations and delayed auditory responses as translational biomarkers of autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 15;68(12):1100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.031. — View Citation
Goffin D, Allen M, Zhang L, Amorim M, Wang IT, Reyes AR, Mercado-Berton A, Ong C, Cohen S, Hu L, Blendy JA, Carlson GC, Siegel SJ, Greenberg ME, Zhou Z. Rett syndrome mutation MeCP2 T158A disrupts DNA binding, protein stability and ERP responses. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Nov 27;15(2):274-83. doi: 10.1038/nn.2997. — View Citation
Kaufmann WE, Johnston MV, Blue ME. MeCP2 expression and function during brain development: implications for Rett syndrome's pathogenesis and clinical evolution. Brain Dev. 2005 Nov;27 Suppl 1:S77-S87. Epub 2005 Sep 22. Review. — View Citation
Khwaja OS, Ho E, Barnes KV, O'Leary HM, Pereira LM, Finkelstein Y, Nelson CA 3rd, Vogel-Farley V, DeGregorio G, Holm IA, Khatwa U, Kapur K, Alexander ME, Finnegan DM, Cantwell NG, Walco AC, Rappaport L, Gregas M, Fichorova RN, Shannon MW, Sur M, Kaufmann WE. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary assessment of efficacy of mecasermin (recombinant human IGF-1) for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25;111(12):4596-601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311141111. Epub 2014 Mar 12. — View Citation
Larimore JL, Chapleau CA, Kudo S, Theibert A, Percy AK, Pozzo-Miller L. Bdnf overexpression in hippocampal neurons prevents dendritic atrophy caused by Rett-associated MECP2 mutations. Neurobiol Dis. 2009 May;34(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 3. — View Citation
LeBlanc JJ, DeGregorio G, Centofante E, Vogel-Farley VK, Barnes K, Kaufmann WE, Fagiolini M, Nelson CA. Visual evoked potentials detect cortical processing deficits in Rett syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):775-86. doi: 10.1002/ana.24513. Epub 2015 Sep 18. — View Citation
Liao W, Gandal MJ, Ehrlichman RS, Siegel SJ, Carlson GC. MeCP2+/- mouse model of RTT reproduces auditory phenotypes associated with Rett syndrome and replicate select EEG endophenotypes of autism spectrum disorder. Neurobiol Dis. 2012 Apr;46(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.12.048. Epub 2012 Jan 9. — View Citation
McLeod F, Ganley R, Williams L, Selfridge J, Bird A, Cobb SR. Reduced seizure threshold and altered network oscillatory properties in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Neuroscience. 2013 Feb 12;231:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.058. Epub 2012 Dec 10. — View Citation
Na ES, Nelson ED, Adachi M, Autry AE, Mahgoub MA, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. A mouse model for MeCP2 duplication syndrome: MeCP2 overexpression impairs learning and memory and synaptic transmission. J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 29;32(9):3109-17. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6000-11.2012. — View Citation
Na ES, Nelson ED, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. The impact of MeCP2 loss- or gain-of-function on synaptic plasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jan;38(1):212-9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.116. Epub 2012 Jul 11. Review. — View Citation
Neul JL, Fang P, Barrish J, Lane J, Caeg EB, Smith EO, Zoghbi H, Percy A, Glaze DG. Specific mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 confer different severity in Rett syndrome. Neurology. 2008 Apr 15;70(16):1313-21. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000291011.54508.aa. Epub 2008 Mar 12. — View Citation
Peters SU, Gordon RL, Key AP. Induced gamma oscillations differentiate familiar and novel voices in children with MECP2 duplication and Rett syndromes. J Child Neurol. 2015 Feb;30(2):145-52. doi: 10.1177/0883073814530503. Epub 2014 Apr 27. — View Citation
Pillion JP, Naidu S. Auditory brainstem response findings in Rett syndrome: stability over time. J Pediatr. 2000 Sep;137(3):393-6. — View Citation
Rojas DC, Teale PD, Maharajh K, Kronberg E, Youngpeter K, Wilson LB, Wallace A, Hepburn S. Transient and steady-state auditory gamma-band responses in first-degree relatives of people with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism. 2011 Jul 5;2:11. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-2-11. — View Citation
Stuss DP, Boyd JD, Levin DB, Delaney KR. MeCP2 mutation results in compartment-specific reductions in dendritic branching and spine density in layer 5 motor cortical neurons of YFP-H mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031896. Epub 2012 Mar 7. — View Citation
Wang IT, Allen M, Goffin D, Zhu X, Fairless AH, Brodkin ES, Siegel SJ, Marsh ED, Blendy JA, Zhou Z. Loss of CDKL5 disrupts kinome profile and event-related potentials leading to autistic-like phenotypes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21516-21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216988110. Epub 2012 Dec 10. — View Citation
* Note: There are 26 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Auditory Event-related potentials | EEG will be filtered between 0.5 and 400Hz. The EEG will be segmented around each stimulus presentation. 200msec prior to 1000msec post each stimulus will be collected and averaged for each trial for each electrode. The electrodes with highest averaged N1 waveforms, predicted to be posterior temporal (T5/P3/T3) electrodes, will be used for subsequent analysis. The averaged waveforms will be analyzed for latency to N1 and P1 peak frm which the auditory event related potentials will be the main parameter for statistical analysis. | 3 years | |
Primary | Visual Event-related potentials | VEP analysis will be similar to the AEP analysis. EEG will be prepared using the same methodology but using occipital electrodes with Oz as the primary electrode of analysis. The EEG will be averaged from 200msec prior to 1000ms post stimulus. The N1, P1, and N2 components will be identified and will be averaged and the latency and amplitude of the peaks quantified. P1 latency and N1-P1 time will be the primary end point of the study. The latency will be used for the statistical parameter. | 3 years | |
Primary | EEG | For frequency based analysis, 10-20 ten-second epochs of noise free EEG without clear eye blinks during wakefulness and eyes open; 10 ten-second epochs of wakefulness and eyes closed (assessed by video); and 10-20 ten-second epochs of EEG during each stage of sleep will be analyzed. A prescreen of EEG using a template matching algorithm (EEGlab) can be used to reduce amount of data to be reviewed. For theta and gamma band activity, the EEG will be band passed filtered between 2-10 and 25-70Hz, respectively, and a FFT performed on the filtered data. Spike location, frequency, and activity (change with sleep, eye closure, stimulation) will be calculated. | 3 years |