View clinical trials related to Marijuana Abuse.
Filter by:The new recreational marijuana markets are contributing to polysubstance-impaired driving and other harms, especially when marijuana is used in combination with alcohol, by selling marijuana to obviously-intoxicated customers. In this study, the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce the risk of marijuana sales to obviously-intoxicated customers will be tested in the state-licensed recreational marijuana market in Oregon, one of the first states to ban such sales. The intervention will combine efforts by state regulators to increase deterrence of the state law prohibiting marijuana sales to obviously-intoxicated customers with training of store personnel to recognize signs of intoxication and refuse sales. It will also include testing the rate at which visibly intoxicated customers are refused alcohol at nearby establishments that sell alcohol either on-site or off-site
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare effects of marijuana or cannabis on neuropathic pain and spasticity in spinal cord injury patients. The main question is: Does the cannabis product from KhonKaen University reduce neuropathic pain and spasticity in spinal cord injury patients? The research design is a crossover study. The participants will be randomly into 2 groups: group 1 and group 2. The participants received either cannabis or placebo for 2 weeks. After completing treatment, participants were swapped to the other group for 2 weeks, a wash-out period is 2 weeks. The outcome measurements are pain and spasticity.
The Stanford Tobacco Prevention Toolkit is a free, online Toolkit that consists of a curriculum, educational resources, and a resource directory to be used by educators, parents, juvenile justice workers, and healthcare providers to increase knowledge and awareness of cannabis and reduce use among youth. The aim of this study is to investigate the extent to which the curriculum changes students' intentions to use and actual use of cannabis.
This pilot crossover study will evaluate 3 different potencies of inhaled cannabis (2.5%, 5%, and 10%) and inhaled placebo cannabis for the acute treatment of migraine.
The concerning lack of research related to technology-based psychological interventions in individuals with psychosis and cannabis use disorder (CUD) led to the design a randomized control trial (RCT) with an innovative mobile health e-intervention called ICanChange (iCC). Randomized control trials (RCTs) on well-defined samples (limited to psychosis and CUD) are needed to generate evidence on e-health interventions in individuals with psychosis and CUD. As such, an RCT will be conducted to assess the acceptability and feasibility of administering this e-intervention to young people with psychosis who use cannabis. Besides having scarce cannabis interventions adapted for people with psychosis, there are other barriers to addressing problematic cannabis use, such as the challenging and inadequate access to mental health and substance use services by this population. Implementing these and other approaches in the context of a harm reduction intervention or applying other strategies seeking to minimize cannabis-related harms for people who wish to continue using cannabis may be key in helping individuals set realistic goals that are important and relevant to them.
This study will test whether 42 days of cannabis abstinence, compared to continued cannabis use, is associated with improvements in cognition and psychiatric disorder symptoms. Identical twins, who are concordant on cannabis use, will be experimentally-manipulated to be discordant for 42 days. Each twin, within a twin pair, will be randomly assigned to either the contingency management condition, incentive-based protocol to promote cannabis abstinence, or control condition, no changes in cannabis use requested.
Cannabis users who experienced a psychosis are particularly vulnerable to cannabis-related harms, which can include worse psychotic symptoms and more hospitalizations. Unfortunately, few psychosocial interventions exist that aim to decrease these harms. Instead, most focus on ceasing cannabis use which is rarely appealing to cannabis users. Furthermore, face-to-face psychotherapy often remains inaccessible to people with psychosis mostly due to lack of trained clinicians. Alternatives such as e-interventions have the potential to increase access to treatment and decrease clinicians' workload. Among cannabis harm reduction approaches are the protective behavioural strategies. These strategies do not encourage nor discourage cannabis use. Instead, they recommend behaviours for safer cannabis use. For example, these strategies include: 1) avoid driving a car under the influence of cannabis, 2) avoid mixing cannabis with other drugs and 3) purchase cannabis only from a trusted source. In the present pan-Canadian study, we will test the first e-intervention called CHAMPS (Cannabis Harm-reducing App for Managing Practices Safely) for cannabis harm reduction adapted for young adult cannabis users who experienced a psychosis. CHAMPS is a smartphone application that includes 17 strategies for safer cannabis use, a personalized consumption goal and a consumption journal. The goals of this study are 1) to confirm whether CHAMPS is acceptable to participants and 2) to test whether it works, notably by positively impacting participants' health and cannabis consumption habits.
Most of the studies assessing Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) and neurocognitive functions are cross-sectional without examining the longitudinal changes in neurocognitive function at a within-subject level with respect to the continuum of cannabis use behavior, or mainly studying on the acute cannabis effect. As for the Genome-wide Association studies, the population analyzed for addressing the underlying genetic susceptibility between neurocognitive functions and/or cannabis use or CUD were almost exclusively based on African- or European- American samples or other Caucasian subjects, and thus generalizability to Chinese or to the non-Caucasian population definitely demands more studies. With the upsweeping statistical figures of cannabis use in Hong Kong and Asia, and the substantial falls in the perceived risk and personal disapproval from using cannabis amongst young abusers, coinciding the global advocacy of de-criminalizing cannabis and the increased availability of recreational cannabis worldwide, it is reasonable to predict that there will be a further upsurge in numbers of all aged cannabis users in Hong Kong as in the other part of the world. Therefore, the SToP-C-PeCoG study proposed here as a prospective study in assessing the longer term changes in neurocognitive functions and the associated genetic risks for those repeated and active cannabis users without psychiatric co-morbidity is definitely warranted. The PeCoG study will not only provide the scientific evidence to further unveil the harmful effects on neurocognitive functions for those self-perceived "healthy" users, but also help to raise the public awareness and to improve the understandings to the long-term detrimental effects of cannabis amongst users and non-users. Furthermore, it will provide a chance to study the associated genetic risks for cannabis abusers, in particular in the Asian minority and Chinese, on CUD and poorer neurocognitive outcomes, with genetic vulnerability being generalizable to the local population in Asia. The current study hypothesises that cannabis abusers have neurocognitive function decline over time, and genetic vulnerability is associated with cannabis abusers who have poorer neurocognitive outcomes or with the severity of CUD.
Cannabis use by people with schizophrenia is associated with family distress and poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, an Family Motivational Intervention (FMI) was developed to help parents to motivate their child with a diagnoses of recent-onset schizophrenia to reduce cannabis use. In a single-blind randomised clinical trail with 75 patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia, parents will be assigned to either FMI or to routine care. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at a 10- and 22-month follow-up. The study hypothesis is that FMI will be more effective than routine care in reducing (a) cannabis use in patients and (b) distress and sense of burden in parents.