Mantle Cell Lymphoma Clinical Trial
— SprintOfficial title:
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Study To Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | Celgene |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 254 |
Est. completion date | October 9, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | June 28, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Biopsy proven mantle cell lymphoma - Patients who are refractory to their regimen or have relapsed once, twice or up to three times and who have documented progressive disease - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0,1, or 2 - Willing to follow pregnancy precaution Exclusion Criteria: - Any of the following laboratory abnormalities - Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,500 cells/mm^3 (1.5 x 10^9/L) - Platelet count < 60,000/mm^3 (60 x 10^9/L) - Serum aspartate transaminase/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(AST/SGOT) or alanine transaminase/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) >3.0 x upper limit or normal (ULN), except patients with documented liver involvement by lymphoma - Serum total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, except in case of Gilbert's Syndrome and documented liver involvement by lymphoma. - Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) of < 30 mL/min - History of active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma within the previous 3 months - Subjects not willing to take deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis - Known seropositive for or active viral infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Patients who are sero-positive because of hepatitis B virus vaccine are eligible |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | UZ Brussels | Brussel | |
Belgium | UZ Gent | Gent | |
Belgium | AZ Groeninge | Kortrijk | |
Belgium | Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godine | Yvoir | |
Czechia | Teaching Hospital BrnoHemato-oncology Dept | Brno | |
Czechia | University Hospital2.Dep. of Int.med. hematology | Hradec Kralove | |
Czechia | Charles University General Hospital | Prague | |
Denmark | Rigshospitalet Department of Haematology L4042 | Copenhagen | |
Denmark | Herlev Hospital | Herlev | |
France | Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine Service Onco-Hematologie | Bordeaux | |
France | Hotel Dieu | Clermont Ferrand | |
France | CHU Hopital Michallon | Grenoble cedex 09 | |
France | Centre Hospitalier Departemental Les Oudrairies | La Roche sur Yon | |
France | Clinique Victor Hugo | Le Mans | |
France | CHRU-Hopital Claude Huriez | Lille | |
France | CHU Dupuytren | Limoges Cedex 1 | |
France | Centre Leon Berard | Lyon | |
France | Institut Paoli-Calmettes | Marseille | |
France | CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Saint Eloi | Montpellier CEDEX 5 | |
France | CHRU - Hotel Dieu | Nantes Cedex 1 | |
France | Centre Antoine Lacassagne Oncologie medicale et Hematologie | Nice cedex 1 | |
France | Hopital Saint-Louis | Paris | |
France | CHRU - Hopital du Haut Leveque | Pessac | |
France | Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite cedex | |
France | CHU Rennes Hematology | Rennes | |
France | Centre Henri Becquerel | Rouen Cedex | |
France | CHRU Hôpital de Hautepierre | Strasbourg | |
France | Hopital civil | Strasbourg | |
France | CHRU Hopitaux de Brabois | Vandoeuvre | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum Essen | Essen | |
Germany | Universitaetsklinikum FreiburgInnere Med.1, Haematologie | Freiburg | |
Germany | UKG Universitatsklinikum Gottingen | Göttingen | |
Germany | Asklepios Klinik St. Georg | Hamburg | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum des Saarlandes | Homburg-Saar | |
Germany | Stadtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe | Karlsruhe | |
Germany | Uniklinik Koln | Koeln | |
Germany | Universitatsklinik Munster | Muenster | |
Germany | University of Ulm | Ulm | |
Greece | Attikon General University Hospital of Athens | Athens | |
Greece | University of Patras | Patras | |
Israel | Rambam Medical Center | Haifa | |
Israel | Hadassah University Hospital | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Rabin Medical Center | Petach-Tikva | |
Israel | Sheba Medical Center | Tel Hashomer | |
Italy | A.O. Policlinico - Università di Bari | Bari | |
Italy | A.O.U. di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi | Bologna | |
Italy | Ospedale Regionale di Bolzano | Bolzano | |
Italy | Ospedale Ferrarotto | Catania | |
Italy | Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino | Genova | |
Italy | Ematologia ed Immunologia | Lecce | |
Italy | Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IEO | Milano | |
Italy | San Raffaele Scientific Institute | Milano | |
Italy | Az. Osp. Vincenzo Cervello | Palermo | |
Italy | I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo | Pavia | |
Italy | Az. Osp di Perugia | Perugia | |
Italy | Ospedale S. Chiara | Pisa | |
Italy | Azienda Ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" | Reggio Calabria | |
Italy | Reference Cancer Center of Basilicata | Rionero in Vulture | |
Italy | IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza | San Giovanni Rotondo | |
Netherlands | Meander Medisch Centrum | Amersfoort | |
Netherlands | Medisch Spectrum Twente | Enshede | |
Netherlands | Isala Klinieken | Zwolle | |
Poland | Uniwersytet Jagiellonski Collegium Medicum | Krakow | |
Poland | Malopolskie Centrum medyczne s.c. | Kraków | |
Poland | Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. M. Kopernika w Lodzi | Lodz | |
Poland | Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie w Warszawie | Warsaw | |
Poland | Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych | Wroclaw | |
Poland | Nowotworww Krwi i Transplantacji Szpiku | Wroclaw | |
Russian Federation | Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital 1 | Ekaterinburg | |
Russian Federation | Republic Clinical Oncology Dispensary | Kazan | |
Russian Federation | Institution of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences Russian Oncological Research Centre n.a. N. N. Bl | Moscow | |
Russian Federation | Nizhegorodskiy Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko | Nizhniy Novgorod | |
Russian Federation | Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital | Novosibirsk | |
Russian Federation | Medical Radiology Research Centre RAMS | Obninsk | |
Russian Federation | Perm Territorial Oncology Dispensary | Perm | |
Russian Federation | Scientific Research Institute of OncologySoft Tissue Department | Rostov-na-Donu | |
Russian Federation | St. Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University | Saint-Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | St. Petersburg Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Saint-Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Saratov Medical University Chair of Professional Pathology and Haematology | Saratov | |
Russian Federation | Federal Centre of Heart, Blood and Endocrinology of Rosmed technlologies V.A. Almazov | St. Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary 1 | Volgograd | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Vall D Hebron | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital de La Princesa | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital La Paz | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Costa del Sol | Marbella | |
Spain | Clinica Universitaria de Navarra | Pamplona | |
Sweden | Lund University Hosptial | Lund | |
Sweden | University Hospital Uppsala | Uppsala | |
United Kingdom | Royal Bournemouth Hosp | Bournemouth | |
United Kingdom | Addenbrookes Hospital | Cambridge | |
United Kingdom | Royal Liverpool University Hospital | Liverpool | |
United Kingdom | Christie Hospital | Manchester | |
United Kingdom | Newcastle Hospital Foundation Trust | Newcastle Upon Tyne | |
United Kingdom | John Radcliffe Hospital | Oxford | |
United Kingdom | Derriford Hospital | Plymouth | |
United Kingdom | Southampton General Hospital | Southampton | |
United Kingdom | The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust | Wolverhampton |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Celgene |
Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom,
Trnený M, Lamy T, Walewski J, Belada D, Mayer J, Radford J, Jurczak W, Morschhauser F, Alexeeva J, Rule S, Afanasyev B, Kaplanov K, Thyss A, Kuzmin A, Voloshin S, Kuliczkowski K, Giza A, Milpied N, Stelitano C, Marks R, Trümper L, Biyukov T, Patturajan M, Bravo ML, Arcaini L; SPRINT trial investigators and in collaboration with the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. Lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL-002; SPRINT): a phase 2, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00559-8. Epub 2016 Feb 16. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review | PFS was defined as time of randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to data cut off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up time was 93.9 weeks | |
Primary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis | Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS were defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last completed assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to study discontinuation of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review | Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR), Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR). Participants who discontinued before any response had been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined =50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined =50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review | Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review | Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined =50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis | Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined =50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. | From date of randomization to the discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review | Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator | Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. | From the date of the first treatment to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. | From date of first dose of treatment to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response (TTFR) According to the IRC Central Review | Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. ). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. | From randomization of study drug to time of first documented PR or better response; up to data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Time to first response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the subject was known to be progression-free. | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS) According to the IRC Central Review | Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up was 93.9 weeks | |
Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A Treatment Emergent Adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. | From the date of the first dose of study drug to 28 days after the last dose, up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014 | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. |
Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014 | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. | |
Secondary | Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. | Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01804686 -
A Long-term Extension Study of PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05976763 -
Testing Continuous Versus Intermittent Treatment With the Study Drug Zanubrutinib for Older Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03676504 -
Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD19+ Lymphoid Disease With T Cells Expressing a Third-generation CAR
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05365659 -
IKS03 in Patients With Advanced B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05471843 -
Study of BGB-11417 Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05076097 -
A Study of OLR in First-line Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03891355 -
Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for BTK Inhibitors Relapsed-refractory or Intolerant MCL
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04082936 -
A Study of Imvotamab Monotherapy and in Combination in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04883437 -
Acalabrutinib and Obinutuzumab for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma or Other Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03585725 -
A Pilot Investigator-Initiated Study of Ribavirin in Indolent Follicular Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02892695 -
PCAR-119 Bridge Immunotherapy Prior to Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With CD19 Positive Leukemia and Lymphoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02877082 -
Tacrolimus, Bortezomib, & Thymoglobulin in Preventing Low Toxicity GVHD in Donor Blood Stem Cell Transplant Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01665768 -
Maintenance Rituximab With mTor Inhibition After High-dose Consolidative Therapy in Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01437709 -
Ofatumumab With or Without Bendamustine for Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00963534 -
Lenalidomide, Bendamustine and Rituximab as First-line Therapy for Patients Over 65 Years With Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00921414 -
Mantel Cell Lymphoma Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00541424 -
Combined CT Colonography and PET Imaging in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01456351 -
Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus Fludarabine Plus Rituximab
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01851551 -
Phase 1/2 Study of VSLI Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory NHL
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03295240 -
The Study of Bendamustine, Rituximab, Ibrutinib, and Venetoclax in Relapsed, Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Early Phase 1 |