Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01232426
Other study ID # Mallet2010
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received October 31, 2010
Last updated August 17, 2012
Start date March 2011

Study information

Verified date August 2012
Source Conmed Linvatec Benelux
Contact D Wouters, MD, PhD
Phone +31-134655655
Email dwouters@tsz.nl
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC)
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Intra-articular fractures at the dorsal base of the distal phalanx of the hand are usually referred to as Mallet fractures. Treatment of Mallet fractures remains controversial. Although no differences in clinical results are reported between conservative treatment and operative treatment, operative treatment is suggested for fractures involving more than 30% of articular surface. There are many different operative techniques, all with specific disadvantages. The investigators hypothesis is that operative treatment of Mallet fractures with one Meniscus Arrow® has a better outcome than conservative treatment with a Mallet splint.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 84
Est. completion date
Est. primary completion date January 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- avulsion fracture involving more than 30% of articular surface

Exclusion Criteria:

- (sub)luxation of the distal phalanx

- patients with a Mallet fracture developed 3 weeks or more prior to presentation

- patients with a Mallet fracture with failure of conservative treatment

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Biodegradable Meniscus Arrow®
Closed reduction of the Mallet fracture and fixation with 1 biodegradable meniscus Arrow®
Device:
Mallet splint
Conservative treatment of the Mallet fracture with the traditional Mallet splint.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Amphia Hospital Breda Noord-Brabant
Netherlands Catharaina Hospital Eindhoven Noord-Brabant
Netherlands Kennemer Gasthuis Hospital Haarlem Noord-Holland
Netherlands Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen
Netherlands st. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg Noord-Barbant
Netherlands Twee Steden Hospital Tilburg Noord-Brabant

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Conmed Linvatec Benelux

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

References & Publications (1)

Nelis R, Wouters DB. Is the use of biodegradable devices in the operative treatment of avulsion fractures of fingers, the so-called mallet finger advantageous? A feasibility study with meniscus arrows. Open Orthop J. 2008 Nov 3;2:151-4. doi: 10.2174/1874325000802010151. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other nail deformaties at every control nail deformaties, if present, are noted 1 year No
Primary Extension deficit To evaluate the extension deficit after conservative and operative treatment of a Mallet fracture using the Crawford criteria. 1 year No
Primary extension deficit at every visit, the extension in the DIP joint, is measured 1 year No
Secondary wound healing disturbances at every control, this is noted 1 year No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01583556 - Optional Follow-up Visits for Common, Low-risk Arm Fractures N/A