View clinical trials related to Malaria.
Filter by:This will be an open label cluster randomized study with two active intervention and one control arm. A cluster will be defined as a selected village. One district implementing seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) will be selected, and six villages will be randomly selected in this district. These six villages will be randomly allocated to each of the three study arms; 1) Arm 1 will receive IPTsc with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ); and 2) Arm 2 will receive dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) plus Ivermectin (IVM), all given monthly during the transmission season and 3) Control Arm which will have standard malaria control measures including case management and vector control measures as applicable.
Background: Malaria is a disease carried by mosquitoes in tropical countries around the world. It can cause symptoms like fever, body aches, and weakness. More than half a million people worldwide died of malaria in 2021, mostly children. Researchers want to find ways to prevent the spread of this disease. Objective: To test the effects of a new malaria vaccine. (Volunteers will not be exposed to malaria.) Eligibility: Healthy adults aged 18 to 50 years. Design: Volunteers will be screened. They will have a physical exam with blood and urine tests. They will take a short quiz to make sure they understand the study. Volunteers will have 3 visits to receive the vaccine. These visits will be about 1 month apart. The vaccine will be injected into the muscle of the upper arm. Volunteers will have 12 additional clinic visits. These will start after the first vaccine visit and continue for 8 months. The visits may include a physical exam and blood tests. There will also be 7 follow-up phone calls. These will occur the day after each vaccine visit and then continue for another 12 months. Participants will be asked how they are doing and whether they have had any changes in their health.
This is a First-in-Human (FiH) double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part, dose-escalation trial of MAM01 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) Circumsporozoite Protein (CSP). This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and protective efficacy of MAM01, as well as safety and PK of repeat subcutaneous (SC) dosing.
The Plus Project will assess the impact, operational feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of PMC. Specifically, the impact evaluation will involve monitoring a passive cohort of all children in the study area reporting all doses of SP received and the number of confirmed cases of malaria and anaemia, as well as a prospective active cohort of children who will have seven home visits over an 18-month period. The total number of participants is expected to be approximately 2,080 children in the areas served by 35 health centres in Cameroon. The results of this study will allow direct evaluation of the protective efficacy of PMC on malaria incidence, severe anaemia, and malaria mortality.
The proportion of malaria that is the Plasmodium vivax species is increasing in Indonesia. Reducing vivax malaria will require innovative solutions to cure both the blood and liver stages of the disease. This study will evaluate of the feasibility of implementing point-of-care glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) testing. This will be followed by high dose, short course primaquine treatment regimens for patients with vivax malaria, and combined with patient education, surveillance, and pharmacovigilance. We plan to implement the study at 6 health facilities across Indonesia using a staged before-and-after study, with a mixed method evaluation.
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (SMC) is a fundamental component of malaria control. The SMC program involves that sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) is given to children below the age of 5 years during the peak transmission season in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Yet, its efficacy is increasingly below expectations. This study involves an Operational evaluation of a modified existing intervention and its implementation are prepared in direct interaction with the Ministry of Health (MoH) to tailor data collection to local needs. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. what are the reasons for the continued high infection rates in the SMC-targeted population; 2. what are the implications for transmission of sub-optimal SMC in children less than 5 years old; 3. can the impact of SMC be improved by including older age groups that would both expand the population that experiences direct chemoprophylactic benefits and concurrently reduce transmission to the wider community Researchers will: i) Compare SMC effectiveness as implemented by the national malaria control program and SMC implemented in a research context where all doses are directly observed. ii) Quantify the infectious reservoir and the contribution of different age groups to transmission with conventional SMC (<5 years) and extended SMC (<10 years) iii) Determine the impact of drug resistance and drug absorption on SMC efficacy iv) Understand social barriers and enablers interfering with SMC efficacy and how SMC uptake is related to health equity with special attention to gender inequalities. v) Quantify SMC efficacy decay under programmatic conditions and key drivers of this decay.
Significant gains have been made in reducing the overall burden of malaria worldwide, however these have been far greater for Plasmodium falciparum than P. vivax. P. vivax remains a major obstacle to malaria control and elimination efforts, largely due to its ability to form dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) that allows it to escape detection and treatment. Importantly, they are susceptible only to 8 aminoquinolines such as primaquine. However, primaquine is associated with risk of haemolysis in individuals with a genetic condition, called glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Additionally, the recommended 14-day prolonged treatment regimen is associated with poor treatment adherence, hence ineffective primaquine treatment. Innovative solutions to the radical cure of both the blood and liver stages of P. vivax are urgently required. The PNG National Department of Health has requested a pragmatic study of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of implementing point-of-care G6PD testing followed by high-dose, short-course primaquine treatment regimens for patients with P. vivax malaria. This revised case management is to be combined with practicable enhancements to patient education, supervision, malariometric surveillance and pharmacovigilance. This will be a before-after longitudinal health facility-based study implemented at Napapar and Mugil health centres and Baro and Wirui clinics. A staged approach for the implementation of the revised case management strategy will be used, including patient education and counselling, community-based clinical review, with mixed methods evaluation.
The Plus Project will assess the impact, operational feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of PMC. Specifically, the impact evaluation will involve monitoring a passive cohort of all children in the study area reporting all doses of SP received and the number of confirmed cases of malaria and anaemia, as well as a prospective active cohort of children who will have seven home visits over an 18-month period. The total number of participants is expected to be approximately 1568 children in the areas served by 19 health centres in Côte d'Ivoire. The results of this study will allow direct evaluation of the protective efficacy of PMC on malaria incidence, severe anaemia, and malaria mortality.
This study aims to confirm the efficacy, safety and tolerability of KLU156, a fixed dose combination of ganaplacide (KAF156) and a solid dispersion formulation of lumefantrine (lumefantrine-SDF), when administered once daily for three days in adults and children ≥ 5 kg body weight and ≥ 2 months of age suffering from uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria (with or without other Plasmodium spp. co-infection). In the Extension phase, the safety, tolerability and efficacy of repeated treatment with KLU156 will be assessed for a maximum of two years in patients who did not experience early treatment failure (ETF), who did not experience any study treatment-related SAE (Serious Adverse Event) previously and who gave informed consent to participate in the Extension phase.
This is a Phase IIb randomised controlled trial of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the blood-stage malaria vaccine candidates RH5.1 in Matrix-MTM and RH5.2-VLP in Matrix-MTM in infants aged 5-17 months in Burkina Faso