Major Depression in Remission Clinical Trial
Official title:
Innovative Attention Training to Achieve Stable Remission in Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Verified date | November 2022 |
Source | University Ghent |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a smartphone-delivered attention control training as a preventive intervention for remitted depressed patients. Additionally, the investigators aim to increase the effect of this CBM-intervention by adding a psychoeducation module (CBT-intervention). To test this aim, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) an experimental training condition with prior psychoeducation, (2) an experimental training condition without prior psychoeducation, or (3) a placebo training condition serving as an active control condition.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | December 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - History of = 1 depressive episodes (major or bipolar) - Currently in stable full or partial remission (= 3 months) - Being in possession of a recent computer (needed to install the training software) Exclusion Criteria: - Major depressive disorder (current or less than 3 months in remission) - Bipolar disorder (current or less than 3 months in remission) - Psychotic disorder (current and/or previous) - Neurological impairments (current and/or previous) - Excessive substance abuse (current and/or previous) - Ongoing psychotherapeutic treatment (maintenance treatment is allowed, but with a frequency of less than once every three weeks) - Use of antidepressant medication is allowed if kept at a constant level - Not being in possession of a recent computer (needed to install the training software) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Ghent University | Gent | Oost-Vlaanderen |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Ghent |
Belgium,
Sanchez A, Everaert J, Koster EH. Attention training through gaze-contingent feedback: Effects on reappraisal and negative emotions. Emotion. 2016 Oct;16(7):1074-85. doi: 10.1037/emo0000198. Epub 2016 Jun 20. — View Citation
Vanderhasselt MA, De Raedt R, De Paepe A, Aarts K, Otte G, Van Dorpe J, Pourtois G. Abnormal proactive and reactive cognitive control during conflict processing in major depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):68-80. doi: 10.1037/a0035816. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | User engagement | Measured by the 31-item User Engagement Scale (UES). The UES comprises 6 subscales of engagement: Focused attention (FA; 7 items); Perceived usability (PU; 8 items), Aesthetic appeal (AE; 5 items), Endurability (EN; 5 items), Novelty (NO; 3 items), and Felt involvement (FI; 3 items). Scale scores are calculated for each participant by summing scores for the items in each of the six subscales and dividing by the number of items. To calculate an overall engagement score, the average of each of the six subscales of the UES long form should be summed. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. | Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period) | |
Primary | Change in depression, anxiety, and stress | Measured by the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Primary | Change in rumination | Measured by the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS). This 22-item questionnaire provides a total rumination score (range: 22 - 88), as well as Brooding and Reflection subscale scores (range: 5 - 20). Brooding is characterized by a passive style of moody pondering and is the most maladaptive form of depressive rumination. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Change in attentional bias | Measured by an emotional dot-probe task | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period) | |
Secondary | Change in reappraisal | Measured by the emotion regulation task: Average of two blind raters' scores of participants' reappraisal descriptions on a 5-point scale (0-No Description, 1-Not at all, 2-A little, 3-Good, 4-Very good) on participants' ability to reinterpret negative scenes (separately for the pre- and post-test emotion regulation tasks) | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period) | |
Secondary | Change in negative emotions (after reappraisal) | Measured by the emotion regulation task: Average of negative mood ratings after using reappraisal | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period) | |
Secondary | Change in (mal-)adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies | Measured by the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Change in maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies: State rumination | Measured by the Brief State Rumination Inventory (BSRI) | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Change in general functioning: Quality of life | Measured by the depression-specific 34-item (range: 0 - 34) Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). The QLDS consists of dichotomous response questions, with the response being either True/Not True or Yes/No. It is scored binomially (0-1) and high scores on the QLDS indicate a lower quality of life. | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Change in general functioning: Remission from depression | Measured by the 41-item Remission of Depression Questionnaire (RDQ) for which a high score is indicative for more psychopathology (range: 0 - 82). | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Change in general functioning: Resilience | Measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The CD-RISC comprises of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) | |
Secondary | Treatment Credibility and Expectancy | Measured by the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) | Pre-test, Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period) | |
Secondary | Change in motivation-related variables | Measured by the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Subscales: Interest/Enjoyment, Perceived Competence, Effort/Importance, Pressure/Tension, Value/Usefulness | Post-test (immediately after the two week intervention period), Follow-up (3 and 6 months) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03278756 -
Online Cognitive Control Training for Remitted Depressed Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05557760 -
Effects of Booster Sessions on Depression Vulnerability Following Cognitive Control Training
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05579015 -
Predicting Illness Trajectories In Fully Remitted Major Depression Using Concurrent TBS/fNIRS
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04325529 -
Pharmaco-Neuroimaging Studies of Approach/Avoidance Behaviors and Post-Mortem Studies: Study 1.2 (Stress Manipulation)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05166798 -
Optimal Dose of a Cognitive Control Training for Depression Vulnerability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02407652 -
Cognitive Control Training for Remitted Depressed Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04864353 -
Internet-delivered Intervention Targeting Residual Cognitive Symptoms After Major Depressive Disorder
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04944758 -
Feasibility of Adherence to Light Therapy
|
N/A |