View clinical trials related to Macular Edema.
Filter by:Purpose: To evaluate retinal functional improvement by means of visual acuity and retinal sensibility examination after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
Macular edema is the main cause of low vision in diabetics. They continue looking for new treatment alternatives. The nutritional supplement Alzer, is a powerful antioxidant that together with Diamel, a supplement that has shown efficacy in metabolic control, could be a therapeutic option. Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the Alzer Diamel combination in mild and moderate macular edema. Material and method: A randomized double-blind phase II clinical trial versus placebo will be conducted in 64 patients, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, one will receive Alzer + Diamel and another will receive placebo from Alzer and Diamel. All patients will undergo clinical, biochemical and ophthalmological evaluation during the study.
Diabetic retinopathy is one of the most common complications of diabetes and diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the most common causes of vision loss in diabetes. The purpose of this study is to determine if early intervention with micropulse laser treatment in eyes with good visual acuity (20/32 or better) will improve or stabilize vision loss due to the complications of diabetic macular edema.
This study is conducted to evaluate the safety of a single intravitreal injection of THR-149.
This study is conducted to evaluate the safety of intravitreal THR-317 administered in combination with ranibizumab, and to assess the efficacy of the combination treatment in improving best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reducing central subfield thickness (CST), in subjects with central-involved diabetic macular oedema (CI-DME).
To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of 12 months of Lucentis (ranibizumab) in patients with well controlled compared to those with poorly controlled diabetes using an PRN treatment schedule.
Given the high number of people with DMO and PDR, the need for patients to be seen at short follow-up intervals, the need for frequent treatments and the requirement for long-term follow-up, there is a very large workload in Hospital Eye Services related to DMO/PDR which is making it difficult for the NHS to cope with the demand, in particular, due to shortage of ophthalmologists. This is only expected to get worse given the increasing prevalence of DM. Identifying new ways of increasing the NHS capacity and efficiency without compromising the quality of care would greatly benefit the NHS. The purpose of this study is to determine whether successfully treated patients with DMO and PDR could be followed up without a face-to-face examination by an ophthalmologist. EMERALD will evaluate a new care pathway which will include multimodal retinal imaging and separate image assessment by trained ophthalmic graders. This new pathway will be compared to the current standard care pathway: for DMO: ophthalmologist evaluating patients in clinic by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and with access to OCT images; for PDR ophthalmologists evaluating patients in clinic by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. EMERALD will compare how accurate the new pathway is at determining which patients have active or inactive disease. The costs and acceptability of current and new models of care will also be compared.
This was a Phase III, randomized, double-masked, multi-center, active-controlled, two-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg compared to the active control, aflibercept 2 mg used per authorized label, in subjects with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).
The main objectives of this observational cohort study are to describe the use of intravitreal aflibercept and to describe follow-up as well as treatment patterns in patients with wAMD or DME in routine clinical practice in Latin America for a study population of treatment naive patients and those who have received prior therapy (anti-VEGF injections, laser, steroids, etc.) and are being switched to intravitreal aflibercept injection.