View clinical trials related to Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin.
Filter by:Allogeneic transplantation is used to treat many malignant and non-malignant diseases. The investigators and others have shown that less toxic preparative regimens (reduced intensity or 'mini' transplants) allow reliable allogeneic engraftment and durable remissions, significantly broadening the population of patients who may be offered this therapy to those who are older and more infirmed. The field is now focusing on the period post transplant for approaches to immune recovery leading to improved outcomes. The primary objective of this registry is to catalogue data from patients who undergo standard of care reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation.
Participants with relapsed or refractory leukemia or lymphoma will be recruited for this study to find whether or not the addition of a new drug called bendamustine will be safe and possible to give with other chemotherapy drugs. This drug is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of other cancers in adults that are similar to those being studied in the research trial. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES - To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bendamustine in combination with clofarabine and etoposide in pediatric participants with hematologic malignancies. - To characterize the safety profile and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bendamustine in combination with clofarabine and etoposide. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES - To estimate event-free survival at 4 months. - To estimate minimal residual disease (MRD) levels present at end of each cycle of therapy in participants with leukemia. - To characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of bendamustine in the proposed regimen.
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of alisertib and romidepsin in treating patients with B-cell or T-cell lymphomas that have returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) or have not responded to treatment (refractory). Alisertib and romidepsin may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
This study aims to investigate the value of dual time point PET/CT in lymphoma. Since FDG uptake is linked to glucose metabolism, PET imaging is also used to detect suspected sites for infectious and inflammatory disorders. In a clinical setting, it is a challenge to distinguish between FDG uptake in benign and malignant lesions and this gives rise to a considerable quantity of false positive results and decreased positive predictive values. Performing FDG-PET imaging sixty minutes after injection is common practice in the staging and surveillance of lymphoma but this procedure may not be optimal, especially not in settings where benign inflammatory lesions are of clinical concern. In an attempt to find an alternative method for this discrimination, dual time point FDG-PET was introduced. This technique has shown itself to be a potentially promising method in FDG-PET imaging for distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions using SUV values. The reason for the different FDG uptake patterns between inflammatory and malignant lesions is unclear. Several factors may contribute to this phenomenon on a cellular basis. It has been shown that cancer cells exhibit increased numbers of glucose transporter and low level of glucose-6-phosphatase. Varying levels between different cancer cell types may explain the different FDG uptake curves. Because various cell types exhibit varying rates of FDG uptake we believe that kinetic investigation may prove to be of value in understanding different types of lymphoma and identifying how to perform precise imaging for staging and surveillance.
Patients with previously untreated low tumor burden indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging to determine response. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1998 for the treatment of patients with relapsed low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Clinically, four weekly doses of rituximab have proven to be well tolerated and effective in previously untreated as well as relapsed patients with low-grade lymphoma. GA101 is an anti-CD20 humanized and glyco-engineered monoclonal antibody. GA101 has been shown to have increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and direct cell-death induction compared to Rituximab. It is possible that GA101 may have greater efficacy than rituximab. PrE0401 Sub-Study Evaluation of Corrected QT (QTc) Interval and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Participating in GA101 (Obinutuzumab) Approximately twenty-five patients randomized to GA101 may participate in the sub-study. Electrocardiograms and blood samples will be obtained.
This is a phase I study of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (modified VXD) plus MLN9708 in adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma or mixed phenotype acute leukemia.
This was a Phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of duvelisib as a monotherapy in participants with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (follicular lymphoma [FL], marginal zone lymphoma, or small lymphocytic lymphoma) that was refractory to rituximab and to either chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy (RIT).
Hypothesis: encouraging results of phase II study FAVE in the treatment of hormonal resistant prostate cancer lead us to continue clinical development of efavirenz. Furthermore, all available pre-clinical and clinical data lead us to conduct a Phase 1 study with efavirenz. Objective of this Phase I is to test doses above 600 mg / day in patients with cancer in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose to improve therapeutic effect. This study is a single center Phase I trial, conduct with dose escalation scheme of efavirenz by continual reassessment method likehood approach (CRML) on solid tumours (except pancreatic cancer) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Main objective is to determine the safety profile, and particularly the maximum tolerated dose of efavirenz for the treatment of patients with solid tumors (except pancreatic cancer) or NHL in therapeutic failure. Secondary objectives are: - Evaluate efavirenz pharmacokinetics at 2, 4 and 12 weeks; - Evaluate objective response at 12 weeks; - Evaluate progression free survival at 6 months; - Assess biological progression-free survival at 6 months (prostate tumours only). Primary Endpoint Safety will be evaluated according to the toxicity scale NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Dose limiting toxicities will be collected during the first 28 days (+ / - 7 days) after first dose of Efavirenz and will be defined as follows: - Any drug-related toxicity with grade ≥ 3 according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 (except alopecia, nausea and vomiting, regardless of grade), - Any drug-related toxicity, regardless of grade, who led a treatment delay> 14 days, - Score ≥ 19 HAD during treatment. Secondary Criteria - Solid tumors: response and progression defined by RECIST v1.1 [Eisenhauer EA et al. EJC 2009). - Non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Response and progression defined according to Cheson criteria [Cheson BD et al. JCO 1999] - Biological progression (particular case of prostate tumors): defined according to Scher [Scher HI et al. JCO 2008] Statistical Considerations This is a Phase I dose escalation strategy using the method CRML, described by O'Quigley and Shen [O'Quigley et al. Biometrics 1996] and commonly used in Phase I trials in oncology. - Maximum number of eligible and evaluable subjects is 30. - Six dose levels are initially defined: 600 mg, 1200 mg, 1800 mg, 2200 mg, 2600 mg, 3000 mg. - The risk of dose limiting toxicities maximum allowed is 25%.
This dose-escalation study is designed for determining the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), biological, and clinical activity of DI-Leu16-IL2 administered to participants with cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) positive NHL that have failed standard rituximab-containing therapy.
The goal of this study is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy profile of IPI-145 given in combination with rituximab, or bendamustine plus rituximab, to subjects with select relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies.