Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03154710
Other study ID # ILC-1-2016
Secondary ID 2016-A01024-47
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 12, 2017
Est. completion date March 12, 2021

Study information

Verified date April 2020
Source Weprom
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Lymphoma is the 6th cancer in terms of incidence in France where approximately 11,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Most types of lymphomas occur at all ages with a predominance in elderly subjects. With the continuous improvement of the diagnostic techniques and the treatments, the prognosis of lymphomas is constantly improving. However, 20-40% of patients relapse most often within 2 or 3 years after the end of treatment. The current standard follow up includes a clinical examination and a biological check-up every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months up to 5 years and an imaging every 6 months. However, the interest of this systematic surveillance by imaging is controversial. The use of new information and communication technologies, can improve the clinical follow-up of patients. To date, access to the Internet and portable technologies is sufficiently broad and democratized to envisage the use of this type of remote surveillance in the field of health. In particular to facilitate the dissemination of information between the patient and the physician. It is thus possible to imagine using this flow of information to generate alerts. Strengthening the clinical follow-up in this indication, in which routine imaging has not demonstrated their interest, in particular by the implementation of remote monitoring completed by the patient, may present an advantage in terms of effectiveness and precocity of care. In this pathology, up to 40% of patients relapse early (within 2 to 3 years), in the vast majority of cases symptomatically (less than 2% asymptomatic relapse discovered by imaging). Finally the CT scan every 6-month , which generates radiation costs and exposures for a relatively low benefit, is performed in symptomatic patients since several weeks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interest of a web-mediated follow up using a score based on the dynamics and the association of clinical and biological signs to alert the physician of a possible recurrence of the patients treated for a lymphoma in complete or partial response.


Description:

Lymphoma is the 6th cancer in terms of incidence in France where approximately 11,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Most types of lymphomas occur at all ages with a predominance in elderly subjects. With the continuous improvement of the diagnostic techniques and the treatments, the prognosis of lymphomas is constantly improving. However, 20-40% of patients relapse most often within 2 or 3 years after the end of treatment. The current standard follow up includes a clinical examination and a biological check-up every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months up to 5 years and an imaging every 6 months. However, the interest of this systematic surveillance by imaging is controversial. The use of new information and communication technologies, can improve the clinical follow-up of patients. To date, access to the Internet and portable technologies is sufficiently broad and democratized to envisage the use of this type of remote surveillance in the field of health. In particular to facilitate the dissemination of information between the patient and the physician. It is thus possible to imagine using this flow of information to generate alerts. Strengthening the clinical follow-up in this indication, in which routine imaging has not demonstrated their interest, in particular by the implementation of remote monitoring completed by the patient, may present an advantage in terms of effectiveness and precocity of care. In this pathology, up to 40% of patients relapse early (within 2 to 3 years), in the vast majority of cases symptomatically (less than 2% asymptomatic relapse discovered by imaging). Finally the CT scan every 6-month , which generates radiation costs and exposures for a relatively low benefit, is performed in symptomatic patients since several weeks. In addition, strengthened clinical follow-up may improve the early detection of relapses and also improve surveillance of all significant clinical complications commonly seen in patients with severe disease (sepsis, thromboembolism, late iatrogenics, etc.). If a benefit in survival is to be expected, it will most likely be due to the early detection of relapses and better control of recidivism through early treatment and management and the early implementation of appropriate supportive care, if only by the management of depressive symptoms, or the management of iatrogenic or other complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interest of a web-mediated follow up using a score based on the dynamics and the association of clinical and biological signs to alert the physician of a possible recurrence of the patients treated for a lymphoma in complete or partial response.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date March 12, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 14, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with either: 1. T-cell lymphoma in first complete or partial response 2. Hodgkin lymphoma in 2nd complete or partial response including after autograft 3. Large B-cell diffuse lymphoma in 2nd complete or partial response including after autograft 2. End-of-treatment imaging in the last 4 weeks 3. Age = 18 years 4. PS =2 (WHO) 5. Patient with an initial symptoms score less than or equal to 5 6. Patient with internet access and mailbox 7. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme 8. Patient with written consent prior to any procedure specific to the study Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient whose lymphoma progressed at the end of the specific treatment (evaluation <3 months after the end of the previous treatment) 2. Symptomatic brain or meninges localisation 3. Presence or history of another cancer in the last 3 years, except skin cancers (other than melanoma), in situ cancers of the cervix or other cancers considered cured 4. Persons deprived of their liberty or under trusteeship 5. Dementia, mental impairment or psychiatric pathology that may compromise the informed consent of the patient and / or compliance with the protocol and follow-up of the study 6. Patients who can not follow the protocol for psychological, social, family or geographical reasons, 7. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 8. Patient participating in another interventional study

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
MOOVCARE
web-mediated follow up

Locations

Country Name City State
France Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz Besançon
France Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Gironde
France Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Bordeaux
France Institut d'Hématologie de Basse Normandie Caen Normandie
France Polyclinique du Parc Caen Normandie
France Centre Hospitalier Univeritaire Dijon
France CHU Grenoble Grenoble
France Centre Jean Bernard Le Mans
France Ch Mont de Marsan Mont-de-Marsan
France Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly Nancy
France Hôpital Privé du Confluent Nantes Pays De Loire
France Hopital Saint Louis Paris
France Clinique Saint Anne Strasbourg
France Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Tours
France CHBA Vannes Vannes Bretagne

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Weprom SIVAN Innovation, Takeda

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Significant Complications Detected and Confirmed by a Medical Consultation Performed Outside the Standard Follow-up In the experimental group, identification of the absence of alert in case of complications and in the standard arm, identification of the absence of medical consultation (referring physician) in case of complications. 6 months
Secondary Complication Detection Time Time between the diagnosis of a complication and the nearest expected date of the subsequent follow-up programmed 24 months
Secondary Number of Complication Observed Collection of all complication presented by patients 24 months
Secondary Rate of Hospitalization for Vital Emergency Collection of serious adverse events 24 months
Secondary Sensibility of the Web-application Number of alerts triggered by the application in relation to the results of the systematic imaging or triggered by an alert 24 months
Secondary Compliance Number of assessement completed (usually 1 per 2 weeks) by patients 24 months
Secondary Performances Status (PS) at Relapse PS according to WHO 24 months
Secondary Quality of Life Completion of the quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months up to 12 months
Secondary Depression Completion of the "HUMEUR PhQ9" questionnaire at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months up to 12 months
Secondary Satisfaction Completion of a questionnaire after 6 months 6 months
Secondary Progression Free Survival Time between the diagnostic of partial or complete response and the diagnostic of relapse 24 months
Secondary Overall Survival Time between the diagnostic of partial or complete response and the patient's death 24 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03977623 - Genomic Evaluation in Patients With Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma After First Relapse/Progression
Recruiting NCT02428751 - R-CHOP Versus R-CDOP as First-line Treatment for Elderly Patients With Diffuse Large-B-cell Lymphoma Phase 3
Completed NCT02555267 - Geriatric Assessments in Elderly Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruiting NCT02364050 - Prospective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGM
Terminated NCT00529503 - A Randomized Phase IIb Placebo-Controlled Study of R-ICE Chemotherapy With and Without SGN-40 for Patients With DLBCL Phase 2
Terminated NCT02413489 - An Efficacy and Safety Proof of Concept Study of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, and Follicular Lymphoma Phase 2
Completed NCT02086604 - Brentuximab Vedotin and Lenalidomide for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Phase 1
Completed NCT01421524 - Study of CC-122 to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, or Multiple Myeloma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03600363 - A Clinical Trial of Metformin in the Maintenance of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03646422 - AEDV Registry of Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma
Recruiting NCT04446962 - LOC-R01 Study of Lenalidomide and Ibrutinib in Association With Rituximab-Methotrexate Procarbazine Vincristin (R-MPV) Phase 1/Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT03241017 - Durvalumab in DLBCL After Autologous Transplant Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02931201 - Evaluating 18F-FDG PET/CT With Liver SUVmax-based Criteria for Prognosis of Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma N/A
Recruiting NCT02928861 - 18F-FDG PET/CT-based Prognostic Model for Predicting Outcome in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma N/A
Terminated NCT02592876 - Treatment Study of Denintuzumab Mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) Plus RICE Versus RICE Alone for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Phase 2
Completed NCT00849147 - Bone Marrow Transplant From Partially Matched Donors and Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Blood Cancers (BMT CTN 0603) Phase 2
Completed NCT00822432 - Coproporphyrine Isomers and Methotrexate Elimination N/A
Completed NCT03682796 - Study of TRPH-222 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04982471 - Connect® Lymphoma Disease Registry: A US-Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Completed NCT03744676 - A Safety Trial of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (JCAR017) for Relapsed and Refractory (R/R) B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in the Outpatient Setting (TRANSCEND-OUTREACH-007) Phase 2