Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05840003
Other study ID # LOCAL/2022/JG-01
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2023
Est. completion date March 1, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Contact Joël GREFFIER, Dr.
Phone +334 66 68 40 68
Email Joel.GREFFIER@chu-nimes.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The new image reconstruction algorithm (Precise Image, Philips Healthcare) has a strong potential to maintain sufficient image quality suitable for diagnosis with ultra-low dose (ULD) chest and abdomen-pelvis scans. The hypothesis is that the images obtained with the Precise Image algorithm for ULD acquisitions are of sufficient and suitable quality for the diagnosis of certain lung, abdominal-pelvic and bone lesions.


Description:

Recently a new image reconstruction algorithm based on Deep-learning has been developed (Precise Image, Philips Healthcare). Initial studies on phantoms have shown that this algorithm improves image quality and reduces patient dose compared to the iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm. Feasibility studies have validated the image quality for low-dose levels (LD). However, this algorithm has a strong potential to maintain sufficient image quality suitable for diagnosis with ultra-low dose (ULD) chest and abdomen-pelvis scans. The hypothesis is that the images obtained with the Precise Image algorithm for ULD acquisitions are of sufficient and suitable quality for the diagnosis of certain lung, abdominal-pelvic and bone lesions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance of the global quality of thoraco-abdominopelvic images of a ULD scan acquisition compared to a standard dose CT acquisition and measure the global agreement of the global quality of the images with a 4-point Likert scale. The ULD acquisition will allow a significant reduction in the X-ray dose delivered to patients compared to a standard dose conventional scanner. This reduction is estimated at 70%.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 116
Est. completion date March 1, 2024
Est. primary completion date January 1, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patient having given free and informed consent. - Patient who has signed the consent form. - Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of a health insurance plan. - Patient with a BMI < 35 kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: - Patient participating in research involving human subjects defined as Category 1. - Patient in an exclusion period as determined by another study. - Patient under court protection, guardianship or trusteeship. - Patient unable to give consent. - Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information. - Pregnant patient. - Patient with a BMI = 35 kg/m2

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Radiation:
Ultra-Low-Dose thoraco-abdominopelvic scan
In addition to the usual management (i.e. standard dose Computed Tomography), an Ultra-Low-Dose thoraco-abdominopelvic scan will be routinely performed.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Concordance of the global quality of thoraco-abdomino-pelvic images from an Ultra-Low-Dose scanner acquisition compared to a standard dose scanner acquisition A 4-point Likert scale will be used to evaluate the overall image quality to see whether it is good enough to visualize the structures of interest and possible lesions.
Overall image quality is rated as follows:
Completely interpretable without noise, smoothing, and/or artifact,
Completely interpretable with low artifacts and/or low level of noise or/and smoothing,
Interpretable with moderate noise and/or smoothing and moderate artifacts,
Uninterpretable
Day 0
Secondary Distribution of image quality with the standard dose scanner Distribution of image quality for each of the two examinations of interest (ULD scanner and standard dose scanner) and to estimate the frequency of good quality images (level 1-2) for each of the two examinations.
- Fully interpretable without noise, smoothing and/or artifact,
- Fully interpretable with low artifacts and/or low noise and/or smoothing,
- Interpretable despite moderate noise and/or smoothing and moderate artifacts,
- Not interpretable
Day 0
Secondary Frequency of good quality images with the standard dose scanner Distribution of image quality for each of the two examinations of interest (ULD scanner and standard dose scanner) and to estimate the frequency of good quality images (level 1-2) for each of the two examinations. Grouping of the variable into 2 classes for the estimation of the frequency of good quality (1-2) images:- 1-2 vs. 3-4 Day 0
Secondary Distribution of image quality with the Ultra-Low-Dose scanner Distribution of image quality for each of the two examinations of interest (ULD scanner and standard dose scanner) and to estimate the frequency of good quality images (level 1-2) for each of the two examinations.
- Fully interpretable without noise, smoothing and/or artifact,
- Fully interpretable with low artifacts and/or low noise and/or smoothing,
- Interpretable despite moderate noise and/or smoothing and moderate artifacts,
- Not interpretable
Day 0
Secondary Frequency of good quality images with the Ultra-Low-Dose scanner Distribution of image quality for each of the two examinations of interest (ULD scanner and standard dose scanner) and to estimate the frequency of good quality images (level 1-2) for each of the two examinations. Grouping of the variable into 2 classes for the estimation of the frequency of good quality (1-2) images:- 1-2 vs. 3-4 Day 0
Secondary Confidence level of each radiologist's diagnosis : Ultra-Low-Dose scan acquisition To compare the confidence level of each radiologist's diagnosis for each of the two examinations of interest (Ultra-Low-Dose scan and standard dose scan) a subjective assessment of the each radiologist's (Junior/Senior) diagnostic confidence level will be made. Day 0
Secondary Confidence level of each radiologist's diagnosis : Standard-Dose scan acquisition To compare the confidence level of each radiologist's diagnosis for each of the two examinations of interest (Ultra-Low-Dose scan and standard dose scan) a subjective assessment of the each radiologist's (Junior/Senior) diagnostic confidence level will be made. Day 0
Secondary Inter-rater agreement (Senior vs. junior radiologist) regarding the Ultra-Low-Dose scan acquisitions Likert scales for global image quality and the level of confidence of the diagnosis will be used to assess inter-rater agreement (senior radiologist vs. junior radiologist) for each CT acquisition. Day 0
Secondary Inter-rater agreement (Senior vs. junior radiologist) regarding the Standard-Dose scan acquisitions Likert scales for global image quality and the level of confidence of the diagnosis will be used to assess inter-rater agreement (senior radiologist vs. junior radiologist) for each CT acquisition. Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Thoracic lesions seen on the Ultra-Low-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients.
Presence of at least one thoracic, (Yes/No)
Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Thoracic lesions seen on the Standard-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients. Presence of at least one thoracic lesion (Yes/No) Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Abdominal lesions seen on the Ultra-Low-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients. Presence of at least one abdominal lesion (Yes/No) Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Abdominal lesions seen on the Standard-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients. Presence of at least one abdominal lesion (Yes/No) Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Pelvic lesions seen on the Ultra-Low-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients. Presence of at least one pelvic lesion (Yes/No) Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Pelvic lesions seen on the Standard-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of thoracic, abdominal and/or pelvic lesions made from a ULD scan or from a conventional standard dose scan in these patients. Presence of at least one pelvic lesion (Yes/No) Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Spine lesions seen on the Ultra-Low-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of bone lesions of the spine and pelvis made from a ULD scan or from a standard dose CT scan in these patients. Presence of at least one bone lesion within the spine (Yes/No). Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Spine lesions seen on the Standard-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of bone lesions of the spine and pelvis made from a ULD scan or from a standard dose CT scan in these patients. Presence of at least one bone lesion within the spine (Yes/No). Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Pelvic bone lesions seen on the Ultra-Low-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of bone lesions of the spine and pelvis made from a ULD scan or from a standard dose CT scan in these patients. Presence of at least one bone lesion on the pelvis (Yes/No). Day 0
Secondary Overall concordance of the diagnosis. Pelvic bone lesions seen on the Standard-Dose scan Overall concordance of the diagnosis of bone lesions of the spine and pelvis made from a ULD scan or from a standard dose CT scan in these patients. Presence of at least one bone lesion on the pelvis (Yes/No). Day 0
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05563701 - Evaluation of the LVivo Image Quality Scoring (IQS)
Completed NCT04908397 - Carnitine Consumption and Augmentation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Phase 1
Terminated NCT03309358 - A Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled SNSP113 in Healthy Subjects and Subjects With Stable Cystic Fibrosis Phase 1
Completed NCT03682354 - ESPB Versus INB With PCIA in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03683186 - A Study Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ralinepag in Subjects With PAH Via an Open-Label Extension Phase 3
Completed NCT03626519 - Effects of Menthol on Dyspnoea in COPD Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06004440 - Real World Registry for Use of the Ion Endoluminal System
Completed NCT04874948 - Absorption, Elimination and Safety of 14C-labeled Radioactive BTZ-043, a New Compound in TB Treatment Phase 1
Completed NCT02926768 - Phase I/II Study of CK-101 in NSCLC Patients and Other Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT01443845 - Roflumilast in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Treated With Fixed Dose Combinations of Long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) and Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) Phase 4
Completed NCT00269256 - Stress, Environment, and Genetics in Urban Children With Asthma N/A
Completed NCT00281216 - Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Individuals Experiencing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations N/A
Terminated NCT00233207 - IC14 Antibodies to Treat Individuals With Acute Lung Injury Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00129350 - Assessment of Heart and Heart-Lung Transplant Patient Outcomes Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT00115297 - Montelukast for Early Life Wheezing Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00094276 - Intervention for Improving Asthma Care for Minority Children in Head Start N/A
Completed NCT00091767 - Genetic Studies in Difficult to Treat Asthma: TENOR N/A
Completed NCT00083798 - Family Linkage Study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Iceland N/A
Completed NCT00089752 - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Improve Milder Obstructive Sleep Apnea N/A
Completed NCT00233168 - Effectiveness of Public Health Model of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Control for High-Risk Adolescents N/A