Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05344430 |
Other study ID # |
20-1058-MATHER |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 8, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
July 8, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2023 |
Source |
Northwell Health |
Contact |
Kenny Lien, MD |
Phone |
631-473-1320 |
Email |
klien[@]northwell.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this study is to determine if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a viable
alternative imaging guidance modality for percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) in
a community hospital-based practice, and to determine the incidence of CBCT PTNB-associated
pneumothorax compared to multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) guided PTNB biopsy. The
standard of care in this facility is MDCT guided PTNB biopsy. The experimental arm of this
study is CBCT-guided PTNB biopsy.
This prospective study will identify patients planned for PTNB. Thereafter, data on lesion
characteristics, imaging findings, and clinical history will be collected. Patients will be
subsequently randomly assigned to undergo biopsy using either CBCT or MDCT guidance. This
study will analyze the pneumothorax incidence between groups, and assess for associations
between lesion size/location, pertinent imaging findings, and clinical risk factors.
Description:
Studies have shown that CBCT is a viable imaging modality for PTNB. Although MDCT-guidance
remains the preferred procedural modality, research has shown that CBCT-guided biopsies can
be carried out safely and effectively. Particularly, studies demonstrate a satisfactory
diagnostic yield, low complication rate, and overall reduced patient radiation dose. However,
only a handful of studies have compared this method to MDCT-guided biopsy.
In this 248-bed community hospital-based interventional radiology practice, C-Arm CBCT was
successfully utilized during a three-month period when a dedicated procedural CT scanner was
out of service prior to the installation of a new machine. During this time, CBCT was used to
perform PTNB. This study was prompted given the operators' perception that there was an
overall increased incidence of biopsy-associated pneumothoraxes. Given this subjective
experience, a retrospective analysis was carried out comparing the complication rate during
these three months to the preceding six-month period, when MDCT-guidance was primarily used.
For the primary analysis, patients were grouped based on imaging modality (CBCT n=37; CT
n=64). Multiple Pearson Chi-Square Tests were carried out using p=.05 as the statistical
threshold. Additional analyses dividing patient based on lesion size (≥/< 2 cm in diameter),
lesion pleural depth (≥/< 2 cm pleural depth), bullous lung change on imaging, chest tube
placement, history of COPD, and smoking history were also carried out to assess for related
pneumothorax risk factors.
The investigators found no significant association between the imaging modality used for PTNB
and subsequent pneumothorax (p=.69). However, there was a significant interaction between
chest tube placement and diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p=.03),
where among all study subjects, 6 of the 8 patients requiring a chest tube had a history of
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Additionally, all patients requiring chest tube
placement were either current or former smokers. This finding approached but did not reach
statistical significance (p=0.12).
This study did not confirm the perceived increased pneumothorax rate. However, the findings
corroborate previously published literature, where complication rates between CBCT and
MDCT-guidance are reportedly comparable. This experience demonstrates that CBCT can be
successfully utilized in a community hospital setting, where limited resources often prompt
the need for alternative and innovative procedural approaches.
Outcomes:
To determine the incidence of pneumothorax as a complication of CBCT and CT-guided
percutaneous lung biopsy.
To determine if there is an association between biopsy imaging guidance modality, lesion
characteristics, and associated clinical risk factors.
To collect data that may be used in the future for biopsy modality risk stratification. This
is significant, since resource allocation in community hospital settings may be necessary
more frequently, compared to larger hospital settings. Therefore, proper risk stratification
is needed for appropriate delivery of high quality and safe patient care.
Methods:
The Interventional Radiology department at Mather Hospital has a robust referral volume from
the community oncologists and pulmonologist. In the past year, over 150 CT-guided PTNBs of
the lung were performed.
The number of patients that can be recruited for this study is essentially unlimited. The
only limiting factor would be the number of lung biopsies scheduled in the study institution
per year.
Research protocols will be distributed to the scheduling staff to make them aware of the
randomization process, to enable appropriate scheduling of research participants to the
correct imaging modality and procedure room.
Outpatients scheduled for lung biopsy will be identified by the departmental interventional
radiologists.
This study is exploratory in nature. As a result, the investigators are estimating that 50
patients per treatment arm is sufficient to detect a moderate effect size difference between
groups.