Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06330961
Other study ID # 2023-MED-2756299
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 8, 2024
Est. completion date February 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source University of Valencia
Contact Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga, PhD, MD
Phone +34963983522
Email daniel.sanchez@uv.es
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Low back pain is considered one of the great global challenges in public health due to its high prevalence. Exercise have been shown to cause an increase in pain thresholds, through the effect known as exercise-induced hypoalgesia. Little is known about exercise-induced hypoalgesia induced by different modalities of exercise in low back pain, and its possible effects in lumbopelvic biomechanics. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of exercise-induced hypoalgesia after an isometric, aerobic and a sham/ placebo exercise in non-specific low back pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does an isometric exercise intervention cause exercise-induced hypoalgesia in non-specific low back pain patients? - Is the effect of an isometric exercise intervention comparable to that of aerobic exercise? - Is a placebo/ sham intervention also effective to reduce pain thresholds in these patients? - Do healthy subjects show the same effects in pain thresholds as low back pain patients ? Participants will perform an isometric, aerobic and placebo/ sham exercise intervention in three different recording sessions. Before and after the interventions, pain intensity, pain-pressure thresholds and lumbopelvic biomechanical parameters during trunk flexion-extension will be recorded. Researchers will compare a group of low back pain patients to an age-, gender- and anthropometrics-matched control group of pain-free subjects to see if exercise-induced hypoalgesia is also observed when there is no low back pain diagnosis.


Description:

Exercise causes an immediate reduction in pain sensitivity, known as exercise-induced hypoalgesia. This phenomenon is described as the immediate and lasting reduction of pain sensitivity after therapeutic exercise. This effect has been observed after isometric muscle contractions and aerobic exercises in healthy subjects. The hypoalgesic response is often shown as an increase in pain-pressure thresholds in regions close to the most active muscle groups during exercise, and also in regions further away, which probably reflects the activation of systemic endogenous pain inhibitory systems. This effect has also been studied in patients with chronic pain. Although there is previous work that has shown that aerobic exercise and isometric exercise can cause exercise-induced hypoalgesia, there is no evidence on exercise-induced hypoalgesia caused by isometric maneuvers in patients with low back pain. There is also a lack of placebo-controlled studies, or even studies comparing the analgesic effect of isometric and aerobic exercise in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study will be to investigate, in a placebo-controlled intervention, whether various exercise modalities (isometric, aerobic) that involve activation of the lumbopelvic muscles result in local hypoalgesia in the area of the most active muscles, and/or hypoalgesia in more distant areas of the body, in subjects with low back pain and a group of healthy subjects which will serve as a control group.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 76
Est. completion date February 2025
Est. primary completion date June 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 20 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Control group: no prior history of low back pain or any other kind of low back disorders. Low back pain group: - current symptoms of non-specific low back pain - Symptoms must be severe enough to have caused recent loss of work days. Exclusion Criteria: - mental or cognitive impairment influencing the ability to understand and execute oral or written instructions - any sign or symptom suggestive of potential underlying diseases - presence of red flags or high-risk criteria for referral to emergency medical services - severe functional limitation due to the intensity of the pain - high irritability of symptoms at the time of the selection process - inability to tolerate the prone position

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Isometric exercise
Biering-Sorensen maneuver.Participants will be in a prone position with the anterosuperior iliac spines on the edge of a stretcher. Their lower body will be strapped by the ankles and hips, with the upper body suspended. Participants will keep their trunk extended and parallel to the ground for 60 seconds.
Aerobic exercise
After adjusting height, pedals and backrest in a cycloergometer, there will be 20 minutes of cycling, of which 5 minutes will be a warm-up at 50-60% of maximum heart rate and 15 minutes at 60-70% of maximum heart rate. There will be a constant monitoring of heart rate and oxygen saturation.
Placebo intervention
A maneuver equivalent to Biering-Sorensen test, but with upper limb support on a level step and electromyographic monitoring to ensure minimal activation of the erector spinae. It will be explained to the participant that the aim of such an intervention is to cause electromyographic silence of the erector spinae and keep it for 1 minute.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Clinical Anatomy of the Musculoskeletal System Laboratory. Department of Anatomy and Human Embryology, School of Medicine, Universitat de València Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Valencia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain intensity Pain intensity will be tested using a visual analogue scale, scored from 0 to 10. Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Pain-pressure thresholds Pain-pressure thresholds will be measured with an algometer on 3 points in a randomized order: 1) thenar eminence; 2) erector spinae (5 cm distal to L3); 3) the center of the long head of biceps femoris. Unit: kg/cm2 Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Trunk flexion-extension electromyography (EMG) Average percentages of lumbopelvic muscles activation during flexion, extension, eccentric and concentric contractions and the myoelectrical silence, recorded by an EMG100C Biopac module (Biopac Systems, Inc., Goleta, CA). Unit: percentages of maximum muscle activation Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Flexion-extension ratio (EMG) A ratio between the average lumbopelvic muscles activity at trunk flexion and its average activity at extension, to quantify the relaxation level of the muscle. Unit: dimensionless Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Maximum ranges of lumbar and pelvic flexion Maximum ranges of lumbar and pelvic flexion, in degrees, measured with a Liberty 240/16 electrogoniometer (Polhemus Inc., Colchester, USA). Unit: degrees Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Trunk flexion-extension percentages of motion Average percentages of maximum lumbar and pelvic flexion during flexion and extension, and at the start and end of lumbopelvic muscles relaxation, measured with a Liberty 240/16 electrogoniometer (Polhemus Inc., Colchester, USA) and expressed as a percentage of the maximum range of flexion during each flexion-extension cycle. Unit: percentages of maximum flexion Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Time of maximum flexion Percentage of total flexion-extension time during which the lumbar spine and the pelvis are flexed over 90% of their maximum flexion, measured with a Liberty 240/16 electrogoniometer (Polhemus Inc., Colchester, USA). Unit: percentage of total flexion-extension time Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Fear-avoidance beliefs Fear-avoidance beliefs will be tested using a validated version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Day 1, before, after and 30 minutes past the first intervention. Day 8, before, after and 30 minutes past the second intervention. Day 15, before, after and 30 minutes past the third intervention.
Primary Pain distribution and supra-threshold stimulation Area of pain irradiation, and area of distribution of pressure-induced referred pain after a supra-threshold stimulation over the infraspinatus muscle. Depicted by the participants on a body chart. Unit: cm2 Day 1, before and after the first intervention. Day 8, before and after the second intervention. Day 15, before and after the third intervention.
Secondary Anthropometric data: height Measured with a stadiometer, barefoot. Unit: meters Day 1, before the first intervention. Day 8, before the second intervention. Day 15, before the third intervention.
Secondary Anthropometric data: weight Measured with a calibrated scale with the participant barefoot and wearing light clothes. Unit: kilograms Day 1, before the first intervention. Day 8, before the second intervention. Day 15, before the third intervention.
Secondary Date of birth/ age Self-reported. Unit: years Day 1, before the first intervention.
Secondary Sex/ gender Self-reported Day 1, before the first intervention.
Secondary Basic clinical history and occupational data Self-reported, in an interview. Antecedents of low back pain, occupation Day 1, before the first intervention.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Recruiting NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.