Vestibular Socket Therapy With Simultaneous Implant Placement Versus Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement

Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction Clinical Trial

Official title:

Vestibular Socket Therapy With Simultaneous Implant Placement Versus Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05005585
• Other study ID #: vst versus contour aug.
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: November 2021
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: amir elawady, BDS
• Phone: 00201020205791
• Email: amir112093[@]miuegypt.edu.eg
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone.

Description:

comparing VST technique with immediate implant placement that end up with final crown after 2 months with contour augmentation with early implant placement after 4- 8 weeks of soft tissue healing , then after 3 months final crown delivery both in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone .

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 28
• Est. completion date: April 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: January 1, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone Intact adjacent teeth Adequate palatal and apical bone that allows achieving implant primary stability. Compromised sockets type II defect (Nicolas Elian 2007) =18 years Systemically healthy patients Exclusion Criteria: Extraction sockets with acute or chronic infection or with adjacent infected teeth Heavy Smokers > than 10 cigarettes daily Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy during or within the last 6 months. Unmotivated patients to maintain adequate oral hygiene to follow up. Patients with physical disabilities that could affect follow up.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
• Tooth Loss

Intervention

Procedure:
• immediate implant
immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation technique

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Faculty of dentistry	Cairo	Manial
Egypt	Faculty of dentistry Cairo university	Cairo	Giza
Egypt	Iman AbdelWahab Radi	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Implant survival	If there is no pain or tenderness on use, no mobility, no history of exudates and radiographic bone loss is less than 2 mm from initial surgery implant the implant is considered successful	12 months
Secondary	Changes in the height and thickness of the labial plate of bone	will be measured by superimposing CBCT images obtained at the baseline (time of tooth extraction) and those after 12 months postimplant placement.	12 months
Secondary	Changes in soft tissue height	were identified midfacially and at the apex of the mesial and distal papillae by superimposing the STL (Standard Triangle Language) files of the models, obtained via IOS, at the baseline (of the unrestorable tooth) with those after 12 months of implant insertion	12 months