Local Anesthesia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Success Rate of Anesthesia Between Lidocaine 2% and Lidocaine 2% Mixed With 10% Magnesium Sulfate in the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Posterior Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
68 healthy patients pulpitis and requiring root canal therapy are selected. . Sampling was
done in a simple and non-experimental way from a dental clinic in Isfahan, and then the
samples were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (A, B) using simple
random numbers.
Each vial is filled with distilled water or magnesium sulfate by an individual who is unaware
of the nature of the design and is not involved in the design, and each letter A or B is
written. This statement is not decoded after the statistical examination. Therefore, the
study is blind and blind. In this way, 60 patients are examined in 2 groups of 34 First,
patients with recognized pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth have been identified and
information about them is given. Patients will be introduced to the executive phase after the
required explanation and clarification of the ambiguity and written consent. After completing
the patient information form by the practitioner and complying with all entry and exit
criteria, the study begins on each patient.
The patient records his pain as an initial pain on the Heath-Parker Visual Analogue Scale
(VAS). This pain measurement method involves a 180 mm line with descriptive words that
differentiates patients on a line where the best describes their pain. In order to design a
standard injection of the maxillary nerve block in all patients, using Aspirating Dental
Injection Syringe, Novocol Ontario, Canada, the needle of the 27 mm long 35 mm (Septoject,
Septodont, Saint-Maur-des- Fosses cedex, France) Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 80000/1 mixed
with magnesium sulfate or distilled water, injections in the retro-cell region and cm1 above
the occlusal mandibular plan. After insertion of the needle at a rate of 3-5 mm into the
tissue, aspiration was performed and about 2-3 ml / 2. It is injected from the contents of
the cartridge, the syringe 1 mm is returned to the bone hard tissue (in the form of the
syringe body in the perimmel area of the opposite side), and after the aspiration of the
contents of each cartridge in a 1 minute period It is injected. After 15 minutes, in case of
numbness of the lips, the patient begins to study and the access cavity begins on the desired
tooth. In each of the stages of acquiring the access cavity or entering the initial file to
the canal, in the event of pain, the treatment is suspended and the patient signs his pain on
the pain assessment chart based on the Heft-parker VAS and at this stage the study It's over.
In the absence of anesthetized lips, the patient is excluded from the study and after
completing the injection, the root canal is given.
68 healthy patients (ASA I, II, and over the age of 18 and under the age of 60 years with
posterior mandibular maxillary jaw and with symptomatic pulpitis (severe and long response to
cold test) and requiring root canal therapy are selected. .
The criteria for entering the study include: absence of periodontal disease and any
periapical radiolucency except for PDL dilation, absence of susceptibility to local
anesthetic or sulfite drugs, non-pregnant women and non-lactating women, lack of drugs that
interact with local anesthetic Or change the perception of pain (such as beta-blocker drugs,
opiates, etc.).
Exclusion criteria included: Clinical observation of necrotic pulp after opening the access
cavity in the desired tooth, the patient's inability to give informed consent and patient's
continuation of the research in each stage of the trial.
Sampling was done in a simple and non-experimental way from a dental clinic in Isfahan, and
then the samples were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (A, B) using
simple random numbers.
Preparation of infiltration solution will be such that using a syringe with a high accuracy
(hamilton) of 0.2 ml of magnesium 10% sulfate vial or distilled water sterilized and then
into a 1.8ml cartridge of lidocaine 2% With an epinephrine 80000/1, the solution is shaken 5
times for mixing, so that no sediment should be seen.
Each vial is filled with distilled water or magnesium sulfate by an individual who is unaware
of the nature of the design and is not involved in the design, and each letter A or B is
written. This statement is not decoded after the statistical examination. Therefore, the
study is blind and blind. In this way, 68 patients are examined in 2 groups of 34 people. It
should be noted that all anesthesia is injected by one person.
First, patients with recognized pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth have been identified
and information about them is given. Patients will be introduced to the executive phase after
the required explanation and clarification of the ambiguity and written consent. After
completing the patient information form by the practitioner and complying with all entry and
exit criteria, the study begins on each patient.
The patient records his pain as an initial pain on the Heath-Parker Visual Analogue Scale
(VAS). This pain measurement method involves a 180 mm line with descriptive words that
differentiates patients on a line where the best describes their pain. In order to design a
standard injection of the maxillary nerve block in all patients, using Aspirating Dental
Injection Syringe, Novocol Ontario, Canada, the needle of the 27 mm long 35 mm (Septoject,
Septodont, Saint-Maur-des- Fosses cedex, France) Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 80000/1 mixed
with magnesium sulfate or distilled water, injections in the retro-cell region and cm1 above
the occlusal mandibular plan. After insertion of the needle at a rate of 3-5 mm into the
tissue, aspiration was performed and about 2-3 ml / 2. It is injected from the contents of
the cartridge, the syringe 1 mm is returned to the bone hard tissue (in the form of the
syringe body in the perimmel area of the opposite side), and after the aspiration of the
contents of each cartridge in a 1 minute period It is injected. After 15 minutes, in case of
numbness of the lips, the patient begins to study and the access cavity begins on the desired
tooth. In each of the stages of acquiring the access cavity or entering the initial file to
the canal, in the event of pain, the treatment is suspended and the patient signs his pain on
the pain assessment chart based on the Heft-parker VAS and at this stage the study It's over.
In the absence of anesthetized lips, the patient is excluded from the study and after
completing the injection, the root canal is given.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04633850 -
Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03502135 -
Efficacy of Tetracaine/Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray for Endodontic Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02535273 -
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine Analgesia and Sedation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05902780 -
Can Caudal Dexmedetomidine Provide Effective Analgesia?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04885777 -
Topical Lidocaine Anesthesia for Nasopharyngeal Sampling
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04086394 -
PECS Block in Partial Mastectomy for Postoperative Pain Control
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06129162 -
Pain Perception Comparison of Computerized vs Conventional Injection Methods
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02922504 -
Impact of Music Intervention on Pain Control In First Trimester Surgical Abortion Under Local Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00539084 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Microneedle Device for Local Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03176446 -
Pain and Anxiety Evaluation in Children Using Different Techniques of Local Anesthesia for Dental Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04947267 -
To Compare the Pulpal Oxygen Saturation Level After Administering Mepivacaine With and Without Vasoconstrictor
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02825225 -
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Two Different Prostate Biopsy Schemes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01360749 -
Efficacy and Safety of Lambdalina (Lidocaine Cream) Versus Placebo as an Anesthetic for Laser Hair Removal
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00889642 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of an Iontophoretic Patch Containing Lidocaine and Epinephrine for Venipuncture in Healthy Adult Volunteers
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06395987 -
Result Of Use Of Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia In Fixation Of Ankle Fractures
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05473819 -
Effectiveness of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered Anaesthetic Solution on Pain During Injection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04653974 -
Pain Perception of Needle-free System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02884596 -
Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Women Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
|
||
Completed |
NCT02440347 -
Effects of Articaine Computer-controlled and Conventional Delivery for Anterior and Middle Superior Alveolar Nerve Block
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02371759 -
Lidocaine + Clonidine for Intraoral Anesthesia in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
|
Phase 3 |