View clinical trials related to Liver Transplantation.
Filter by:Liver transplant surgery is one of the treatments provided to patients suffering from end-stage liver disease, and has a successful treatment prognosis. However, it is clear that patient management before, during, and after surgery is a difficult task for medical staff due to the complex clinical and pathological problems of end-stage liver disease. Moreover, the complex surgical technique of the liver transplant surgery itself and the severe hemodynamic fluctuations and multi-organ dysfunction that patients experience during the surgery have been shown to have a tremendous impact on the patient's prognosis after surgery. A study on which clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic factors experienced by patients during the perioperative period, including before, during, and after surgery, affect the survival rate of patients and transplanted organs. will definitely be helpful in the treatment of patients suffering from end-stage liver disease.
Solid Organ Transplantation (SOT) is made possible by the use of a lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. This treatment limits the response of the immune system, enabling long-term survival of the transplanted organ, but also leading to weaker anti-infectious responses. In this study, we will compare the response to a booster Hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) in SOT patients, either after kidney or liver transplantation. We will also compare the immune response depending on the immunosuppressive treatment. In order to provide a detailed picture of the immune response, we will investigate the usual serological response (anti-HBs antibodies), but also the cellular memory (both T and B) using ELISpot assays and flow-cytometry, over a 6 months period following booster vaccination.
The practice of intraoperative blood salvage and autotransfusion (IBSA) during deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can potentially reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. However, implementing IBSA remains debatable due to concerns about its possible detrimental effects on oncologic recurrence. Hence, a nationwide multi-center study was conducted to investigate further the association between IBSA and post-transplant HCC recurrence, including a stratified subgroup analysis.
Research demonstrated that transplant recipients benefit from physical activity, but there is a gap in knowledge regarding the required intensity. In the PHOENIX-Liver study, researchers aim to investigate the adequate intensity of rehabilitation programs after liver transplantation. Patients will be randomized into one of the three PHOENIX-Liver training groups (low, moderate, moderate to high). The six months rehabilitation program is conducted from the patient's home but supervised by a PHOENIX-investigator. At baseline, after three months of rehabilitation and after six months of rehabilitation, a test moment takes place at which physical fitness, cardiovascular health, liver function, and body composition will be assessed. Questionnaires are taken monthly to survey well-being, safety, quality of life, physical activity, and cost-effectiveness. To gather information on the potential for implementation in a real-world setting, a 15-month-long physical activity phase will start after the intervention phase. This entails a maintenance physical activity program tailored to the patients' preferences. A follow-up at UZ Leuven is planned at three and at 15 months where the same clinical evaluations will be conducted as during the test moments of the intervention phase.
Cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death early after liver transplantation (LT). The aging LT population is accompanied with the increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, cirrhosis has been known to cause alterations in the systemic haemodynamic system and cardiac muscle dysfunction, systolic and/or diastolic, known as Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM). Hence, transthoracic echocardiography is required in all LT candidates for preprocedural evaluation and risk stratification. However, traditional echocardiographic indices of cardiac function have low sensitivity. It is unclear whether comprehensive echocardiographic multiparameters, including speckle tracking echocardiograph (STE) and tissue doppler imaging (TDI) can help improve preoperative risk stratification. Therefore, we sought to analyze the ability of clinical and comprehensive echocardiography variables to predict intraoperative and perioperative cardiac events and cardiac mortality in our LT patient experience up to early post-liver transplant.
This is a study to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of taking away the anti-rejection medicine, tacrolimus, in liver transplant recipients in conjunction with everolimus monotherapy to preserve renal function. Two hundred - seventy (270) subjects will be randomized 2:1 into one of two groups between 2-3 months post-transplant. Seventy participants will be placed into an observational group and will remain on their current post-transplant medications. The duration of the study from time of enrollment is 18-20 months.
The goal of this observational study is to map the pathogen profile of secondary infections in liver transplant recipients, to correlate the basic immune status with the characteristics of the secondary infection pathogen profile, and to establish an early warning system for monitoring secondary infections, so as to explore safe and effective therapeutic modalities to further reduce the morbidity and mortality of liver failure. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Characterize the distribution of pathogenic bacteria infecting liver transplant recipients. - Establish a monitoring and early warning system for secondary infections.
Liver transplant rejection is when the body's immune system attacks and damages the liver of a transplant recipient. Currently the best way to see if that is happening is with a liver biopsy. The purpose of this research study is to see if a simple blood test can diagnose if a transplanted liver is being rejected.
Liver transplantation (LT) is a surgery with risk of bleeding. Several risk factors have been identified: complex dissection, portal hypertension, history of ascites fluid infections, history of surgical procedures, pre-existing complex hemostatic disorders and those acquired during the procedure. Diffuse bleeding can occur at any time during the 3 phases of surgery: dissection, anhepatic and neohepatic. However, intraoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements remain difficult to predict. Current predictive models are based in particular on preoperative characteristics and do not take into account the course and different phases of the operation. The need for transfusions has largely decreased over the last 20 years, and currently around 20-25% of patients are transfused (transfusion of at least 1 blood product during LT). However, massive transfusion is necessary in 10% of LT. The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) has issued recommendations on the management of severe bleeding during surgery. However, these recommendations are not specific to LT. Moreover, transfusion strategies vary widely from one center to another. The implementation of protocols within teams dedicated to LT has led to a reduction in bleeding and transfusion, with or without the use of viscoelastic testing. Intraoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements, as well as postoperative thromboembolic complications, remain difficult to predict. Predictive models of bleeding risk have been developed, but they are based solely on preoperative characteristics and do not take into account the course and various phases of the operation. In addition, new methods such as Bayesian inference or machine learning have been developed, and seem capable of providing different information from that obtained by conventional models. The overall aim of this prospective multicenter observational study is to investigate the risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis in per- and post-operative LT using different predictive methods, and to describe the management of bleeding and post-operative anticoagulation in metropolitan France.
The prognosis of liver transplanted (LT) patients with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially those with progression after locoregional treatment or advanced HCC, remains poor. Current treatment modalities involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) characterized by a low response rate and often poor tolerability. Encouraging findings from the Imbrave 150 study, demonstrating increased survival rates coupled with favorable treatment tolerance, prompt the investigators to consider the potential of offering the combination of treatment with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (Atezo-Beva) to patients with LT. No data regarding the safety and efficacy of this new combination are available for patients with LT as they were not included in Imbrave 150. Immunosuppression after LT is low when compared to essentially all other organ recipients, liver recipients are considered with lower immunological risk. However, the use of ICIs has been associated with a risk of hepatic rejection in LT patients. In this study, in order to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurrence, we propose to adopt a standardized immunosuppressive regimen closed to the one used immediately after LT but with lower therapeutic goals for tacrolimus and everolimus to allow immunotherapy treatment to be effective. The better tolerance of liver grafts will probably lead to less risk of rejection with Atezo-Beva than in other organ transplants.