View clinical trials related to Liver Cirrhosis.
Filter by:The University of Michigan is conducting a study investigating a potential new treatment aimed at slowing/halting progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. This will be a 2 arm double blind study in which half of the patients will be randomly selected to receive a placebo (capsule with no active ingredient) and half will receive the new treatment drug, tetrathiomolybdate. Neither the patient nor the treating physician will know which arm the patient is in. The length of the study for each patient is 24 months of drug therapy. Lab draws will be necessary weekly for the first 6 weeks of the study, followed by every other week for 3 weeks, and then monthly for the remainder of the 2 year period. In addition, intermittent history and physicals and urine samples will also be necessary. There is no cost to you for any experimental treatment. All patients in both arms will continue on ursodiol and receive standard of care treatment
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether psychological intervention is effective in improving quality of life, mood, and relationships among adults with hepatitis C virus and cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation.
This is a multi-centre, multi-national, open study to assess the pharmacokinetics of NRL972 in patients with hepatic cirrhosis CTP-classes A, B, and C (histologically confirmed by liver biopsy). The pharmacokinetics of NRL972 will be referenced to a Clinical Staging Matrix obtained during a clinical work-up of patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Patients to be studied will have histologically established hepatic cirrhosis or confirmed hepatic cirrhosis by an objective imaging study without confounding end-stage co-morbidity. Within 14 days of confirming eligibility, the investigations will be conducted over 2-5 days with the test procedures (clinical laboratory tests, ultrasound (US)-investigations, gastroscopy, NRL972- and MEGX'-test). Up to one week after the NRL972-test, a follow-up telephone call will be made.
Background and Aims: The efficacy of portal pressure reduction by beta blockers for the management of small (≤5 mm) esophageal varices in patients of cirrhosis is not clear. The present randomized controlled trial aims to address these issues. The investigators also assessed the utility of serial HVPG measurements in these patients. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis with small varices, with no history of variceal bleed, were randomized to receive propranolol or placebo. These patients were further randomized to undergo no HVPG, only baseline HVPG, or serial HVPG measurement. Propranolol was titrated to reduce heart-rate to 55/min.
The aim of this study is to determine whether a simplified device of albumin dialysis also has beneficial effects.
To identify the most efficient parenchyma transection technique for cirrhotic liver resection between the clamp crushing technique and the ultrasonic dissector. Primary endpoint is intra-operative blood loss during liver transection (ml). Expected results and implications: If one of the technique is better than the other, surgical teams could prefer it to minimize the morbidity of liver resection in cirrhotic patients.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients with cirrhosis of the liver and renal failure and determine if the administration of rifaximin as compared to lactulose is associated with less frequent and/or slower progression to severe hepatic encephalopathy. If one is associated with lower blood ammonia levels. And, if one is associated with lower breath hydrogen and methane levels.
The study is aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a combination therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (12-16 mg/kg body weight (BW)/d) plus budesonide (9 mg/d) vs. ursodeoxycholic acid (12-16 mg/kg BW/d) plus placebo in the treatment of PBC. Depending on ALT values 6 mg/d budesonide are allowed. The study population will be patients with PBC at risk for disease progression. It is assumed that the combination therapy will result in a decrease of treatment failures after 3 years of treatment.
It is well known that terlipressin and albumin improve renal function in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS. In previous studies terlipressin has been used either as intravenous boluses moving from an initial dose of 0.5-1 mg/4 hr or as continuous intravenous infusion at the initial dose of 2 mg/24 h. Up to now the two schedules of i.v. administration of terlipressin have never been compared. Nevertheless, it has been hypothesized that continuous intravenous infusion assures a more steady profile of effect on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, the aim of the study will be to compare terlipressin given as i.v. bolus vs terlipressin given as continuous intravenous infusion in the treatment of type 1 HRS in patients with cirrhosis.
The question whether the sequential diuretic therapy, that means using an antialdosteronic drug at first and adding a loop diuretic in nonresponders, is better than the combination of the two diuretics from the beginning (combined diuretic therapy) in the treatment of ascites in patients with cirrhosis is still open. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare sequential versus combined diuretic therapy in these patients. One hundred patients will be randomized into two groups. Group A will receive potassium canrenoate at the initial dose of 200 mg/day, then increased up to 400 mg/day. Non responders will be treated with 400 mg/day of potassium canrenoate and furosemide at an initial dose of 50 mg/day, then increased up to 150 mg/day. Group B will receive at first 200 mg/day of potassium canrenoate and 50 mg/day of furosemide, then increased up to 400 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively. The percentage of responders to dthe diuretic treatment, the time to get the resolution of ascites and the rate of adverse effects will be compared between the two Groups of Patients.