Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

Leukemia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Treatment of Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Unfavorable Features: A Phase III Group-wide Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00002812
• Other study ID #: 1961
• Secondary ID: CCG-1961CDR00000
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: November 1, 1999
• Last updated: August 23, 2013
• Start date: September 1996

Study information

• Verified date: August 2013
• Source: Children's Oncology Group
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Description:

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the outcomes in children with higher risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) treated with postinduction chemotherapy based on marrow response on day 7 of induction therapy: for patients with rapid early response (M1/M2), standard vs intensified consolidation chemotherapy and standard vs prolonged duration of intensification chemotherapy; for patients with slow early response, addition of doxorubicin vs idarubicin and cyclophosphamide to intensification chemotherapy. II. Decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis by alternating dexamethasone dosing in patients undergoing 2 courses of delayed intensification. III. Assess the impact of day 7 marrow status on outcome in these patients. IV. Determine prognosis more precisely by supplementing presenting clinical features, immunophenotype, ploidy, cytogenetics, and early marrow response with BAX/BCL-2 ratios, pattern of tyrosine kinase activation, leukemic burden following induction and intensification therapy, and development of high antibody titer to E. coli asparaginase. V. Correlate the traditional prognostic factors of day 7 marrow response, immunophenotype, ploidy, cytogenetics, and early marrow response with BAX/BCL-2 ratios.

OUTLINE: This is a partially randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center. Patients receive one course of the VPLD regimen comprised of vincristine IV and daunorubicin IV over 15 minutes to 2 hours on days 0 and 7, oral prednisone daily on days 0-7, intrathecal cytarabine on day 0, and asparaginase or pegaspargase intramuscularly on days 3, 5, and 7. Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 two postinduction chemotherapy groups based on bone marrow response on day 7 of induction. Patients with M1/M2 marrow on day 7 are considered rapid early responders. Patients with M3 marrow on day 7 are considered slow early responders. Group 1: Rapid early responders Patients receive 2 additional courses of VPLD induction chemotherapy. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Arm I: Beginning on day 35 of induction therapy, patients receive standard Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) regimen with standard delayed intensification. Standard BFM for patients in arm I consists of the following: consolidation over 5 weeks with cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and mercaptopurine; interim maintenance over 8 weeks with oral methotrexate and mercaptopurine (MTX/MP); and delayed intensification over 7 weeks consisting of reinduction with vincristine, doxorubicin, oral dexamethasone, and asparaginase or pegaspargase followed by reconsolidation with cyclophosphamide, thioguanine, and cytarabine. Arm II: Patients receive standard BFM regimen with double delayed intensification. Patients receive therapy similar to those in arm I, but dexamethasone is interrupted for 1 week during delayed intensification and the intensification regimen is repeated, separated by an 8 week interim maintenance course of oral MTX/MP. Arm III: Patients receive augmented BFM regimen with standard delayed intensification. Patients receive 9 weeks of consolidation therapy with 2 courses of vincristine and pegaspargase alternating with the arm I consolidation therapy. Vincristine, intravenous methotrexate, and pegaspargase (the Capizzi I regimen) are substituted for oral MTX/MP in the interim maintenance regimen. Pegaspargase is substituted for asparaginase and two additional doses of vincristine are administered during delayed intensification. Arm IV: Patients receive augmented BFM regimen with double delayed intensification. Patients receive intensified chemotherapy throughout, combining the additional therapy given to patients in arms II and III. Patients receiving augmented BFM regimen receive pegaspargase instead of asparaginase. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis are treated only on arm IV. Patients who are Philadelphia chromosome positive and do not have a bone marrow donor are nonrandomly assigned to the treatment group for slow early responders. All RER patients receive the same maintenance therapy with vincristine/prednisone and oral MTX/MP. Intrathecal methotrexate is administered periodically throughout protocol treatment. Group 2: Slow early responders Patients receive augmented BFM consolidation therapy and Capizzi I interim maintenance identical to that received by rapid early responders in arm IV. Patients are then randomized to receive double delayed intensification with either idarubicin or doxorubicin and concurrent cyclophosphamide. All patients receive the same maintenance therapy with vincristine/prednisone and oral MTX/MP. Intrathecal MTX is administered periodically throughout protocol treatment. Patients with CNS disease at entry receive craniospinal irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days beginning on day 0 of consolidation therapy. All slow early responders at diagnosis receive cranial irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days during consolidation therapy. Patients with testicular leukemia at diagnosis receive bilateral testicular irradiation daily for 5 consecutive days during consolidation chemotherapy. Groups 1 and 2: Maintenance therapy continues for 2 years for girls or 3 years for boys beyond completion of consolidation therapy. Patients are followed every 4-6 weeks for 1 year, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 1,520 patients will be accrued for this study over 4 years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 2078
• Est. primary completion date: March 2006
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 1 Year to 21 Years

Eligibility

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) with M3 bone marrow No FAB L3 morphology CNS or overt testicular leukemia at diagnosis allowed High risk status 10-21 years old with any white blood count (WBC) 1-9 years old with WBC of 50,000/mm3 or greater

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 1 to 21 Performance status: Not specified Life expectancy:

Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy for ALL except: Emergency therapy for blast crisis, superior vena cava syndrome, or renal failure due to leukemic infiltration Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: Intrathecal cytarabine or methotrexate allowed at diagnostic lumbar puncture Induction therapy must begin within 72 hours after intrathecal injection Endocrine therapy: At least 1-2 months since prior prednisone, for less than 48 hours, for reactive airway disease Inhalational steroids allowed Radiotherapy: Not specified Surgery: Not specified

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Leukemia
• Leukemia, Lymphoid
• Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Intervention

Drug:
• asparaginase
Given IV
• cyclophosphamide
Given IV
• cytarabine
Given IV
• daunorubicin hydrochloride
Given IV
• dexamethasone
Given IV
• doxorubicin hydrochloride
Given IV
• idarubicin
Given IV
• mercaptopurine
Given IV
• methotrexate
Given PO
• pegaspargase
Given IV
• prednisone
Given PO
• thioguanine
Given IV
• vincristine sulfate
Given IV

Radiation:
• radiation therapy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Australia	Princess Margaret Hospital for Children	Perth	Western Australia
Canada	IWK Health Centre	Halifax	Nova Scotia
Canada	British Columbia Children's Hospital	Vancouver	British Columbia
United States	University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC	Chapel Hill	North Carolina
United States	University of Chicago Cancer Research Center	Chicago	Illinois
United States	Children's Hospital Medical Center - Cincinnati	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Ireland Cancer Center	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	Children's Hospital of Columbus	Columbus	Ohio
United States	Children's Hospital of Denver	Denver	Colorado
United States	University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center	Houston	Texas
United States	Indiana University Cancer Center	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at The University of Iowa	Iowa City	Iowa
United States	Children's Mercy Hospital	Kansas City	Missouri
United States	Long Beach Memorial Medical Center	Long Beach	California
United States	Children's Hospital Los Angeles	Los Angeles	California
United States	Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA	Los Angeles	California
United States	University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center	Madison	Wisconsin
United States	University of Minnesota Cancer Center	Minneapolis	Minnesota
United States	Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center	Nashville	Tennessee
United States	Saint Peter's University Hospital	New Brunswick	New Jersey
United States	Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	Mount Sinai School of Medicine	New York	New York
United States	NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	University of Nebraska Medical Center	Omaha	Nebraska
United States	Children's Hospital of Orange County	Orange	California
United States	Children's Hospital of Philadelphia	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania
United States	Doernbecher Children's Hospital	Portland	Oregon
United States	Mayo Clinic Cancer Center	Rochester	Minnesota
United States	UCSF Cancer Center and Cancer Research Institute	San Francisco	California
United States	Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center - Seattle	Seattle	Washington
United States	Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center	Seattle	Washington
United States	Children's National Medical Center	Washington	District of Columbia

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Children's Oncology Group	National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Canada, 

References & Publications (23)

Arce FJ, Seibel N, Gaynon PS, et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of asparaginases in antibody-negative pediatric patients with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a report from CCG-1961. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-9027

Avramis VI, Ettinger L, Martin-Aragon S, et al.: Anti-asparaginase (ASNase) antibody (Ab) in pediatric patients in high risk ALL study (CCG-1961): correlation of Ab and clinical allergy. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Avramis VI, Panosyan E, Avramis IA, et al.: Anti-asparaginase (ASNase) antibody (Ab) and ASNase activity in children with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR ALL) (CCG-1961). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21:

Avramis VI, Panosyan EH. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations: the past, the present and recommendations for the future. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(4):367-93. Review. — View Citation

Bhojwani D, Kang H, Menezes RX, Yang W, Sather H, Moskowitz NP, Min DJ, Potter JW, Harvey R, Hunger SP, Seibel N, Raetz EA, Pieters R, Horstmann MA, Relling MV, den Boer ML, Willman CL, Carroll WL; Children's Oncology Group Study; Dutch Childhood Oncology — View Citation

Butturini AM, Dorey FJ, Lange BJ, Henry DW, Gaynon PS, Fu C, Franklin J, Siegel SE, Seibel NL, Rogers PC, Sather H, Trigg M, Bleyer WA, Carroll WL. Obesity and outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2063-9. — View Citation

Dhall G, Jones T, Radvinsky D, et al.: Adverse reactions to PEG and Erwinia asparaginase and correlation with anti-asparaginase antibody data and survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group stu

Dhall G, Robison NJ, Rubin JI, et al.: Incidence of adverse reactions to post-induction asparaginase (ASP) therapy in children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group Study CCG-1961. [

Freyer DR, Devidas M, La M, Carroll WL, Gaynon PS, Hunger SP, Seibel NL. Postrelapse survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is independent of initial treatment intensity: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2011 Mar 17;117(11): — View Citation

Freyer DR, Seibel NL, La MK, et al.: Survival after relapse in higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children and adolescents is independent of prior treatment intensity: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG). [Abstract] Blood 112

Hastings C, Sather HN, Seibel NL, et al.: Outcomes in children and adolescents with a markedly elevated white blood cell count (>200,000) at diagnosis of high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a report from the Children's Oncology Group. [Abstract]

Hastings C, Whitlock JA, La M, et al.: Improved outcome of children with Down syndrome (DS) and high risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (HR-ALL): a report of CCG-1961. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-586, 2007.

Henze G. Early postinduction intensification therapy is essential in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008 Sep;5(9):502-3. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1184. Epub 2008 Jul 22. — View Citation

Mattano LA Jr, Devidas M, Nachman JB, Sather HN, Hunger SP, Steinherz PG, Gaynon PS, Seibel NL; Children's Oncology Group. Effect of alternate-week versus continuous dexamethasone scheduling on the risk of osteonecrosis in paediatric patients with acute l — View Citation

Nachman J, Siebel N, Sather H, et al.: Outcome for adolescent and young adults 16-21 years of age (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated on the Children' s Cancer Group (CCG) 1961 study. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-683, 2004.

Nachman JB, La MK, Hunger SP, Heerema NA, Gaynon PS, Hastings C, Mattano LA Jr, Sather H, Devidas M, Freyer DR, Steinherz PG, Seibel NL. Young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have an excellent outcome with chemotherapy alone and benefit from inte — View Citation

Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, La M, Raetz EA, Carroll WL, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS, Loh ML; Children's Oncology Group. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008 Dec;22(12):2142-50. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.251. Epub 2008 Sep 25. — View Citation

Panosyan EH, Grigoryan RS, Avramis IA, Seibel NL, Gaynon PS, Siegel SE, Fingert HJ, Avramis VI. Deamination of glutamine is a prerequisite for optimal asparagine deamination by asparaginases in vivo (CCG-1961). Anticancer Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2C):1121-5. — View Citation

Panosyan EH, Seibel NL, Grigoryan RS, et al.: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of three asparaginases in pediatric patients with higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from CCG-1961. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-2745, 2004.

Panosyan EH, Seibel NL, Martin-Aragon S, Gaynon PS, Avramis IA, Sather H, Franklin J, Nachman J, Ettinger LJ, La M, Steinherz P, Cohen LJ, Siegel SE, Avramis VI; Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-1961. Asparaginase antibody and asparaginase activity in ch — View Citation

Seibel NL, Asselin BL, Nachman JB, et al.: Treatment of high risk T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL): comparison of recent experience of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) and Pediatric Oncology Group (POG). [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-681, 2004.

Seibel NL, Steinherz PG, Sather HN, Nachman JB, Delaat C, Ettinger LJ, Freyer DR, Mattano LA Jr, Hastings CA, Rubin CM, Bertolone K, Franklin JL, Heerema NA, Mitchell TL, Pyesmany AF, La MK, Edens C, Gaynon PS. Early postinduction intensification therapy — View Citation

Withycombe JS, Post-White JE, Meza JL, Hawks RG, Smith LM, Sacks N, Seibel NL. Weight patterns in children with higher risk ALL: A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for CCG 1961. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;53(7):1249-54. doi: 10.1002/ — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Event Free Survival	The primary outcome index used in examining most of the randomized treatment groups will be event-free survival (EFS).	from the time of randomization where the life table events will consist of the first occurrence of the following events: failure to achieve remission, leukemic relapse at any site, death, or occurrence of a second malignancy.	No