View clinical trials related to Leukemia.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and the clinical activities of NP137 when combined with Azacitidine and Venetoclax in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia after 2 cycles of Azacitidine and Venetoclax.
This was a retrospective descriptive analysis of health care claims data using the IQVIA open source medical and pharmacy claims databases. Patients were grouped into one of two cohorts depending on the index medication. All patients with at least 1 pharmacy claim for asciminib occurring between 01 January 2021 and 30 April 2022 in (Phase 1) were grouped into the asciminib cohort. A data refresh was conducted (Phase 1 refresh) and all patients with at least 1 pharmacy claim for asciminib occurring between 01 January 2021 and 29 August 2022 were included in the asciminib cohort. Patients were required to have at least 6 months of continuous data availability prior to the start of treatment and were followed from the start of treatment until the end of available follow-up. The end of available follow up in open source data was defined as 1) last claim date in medical or pharmacy data, OR 2) last day of index pharmacy stability, OR 3) end of study period, whichever came first. While no post-index data availability were required in Phase 1, a subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with at least 3 and 6 months of available follow-up after the index date in Phase 1 refresh. In Phase 2 of the study, patients with no exposure to asciminib and with at least 1 pharmacy claim for imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib or ponatinib were indexed to the first new tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) observed between 01 January 2021 and 29 August 2022 and grouped into the other TKI cohort. The index date was the initiation date of the index medication. Patients were required to have linkage to the open-source medical claims database and at least 3 months of available follow-up after the index date.
Study GLB-001-01 is a first-in-human (FIH), Phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and expansion clinical study of GLB-001 in participants with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) or in participants with relapsed or refractory higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (R/R HR-MDS). The dose escalation part (Phase 1a) of the study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of GLB-001 administered orally. Approximately 24 participants (up to 42 participants) may be enrolled in Phase 1a of the study. The dose expansion part (Phase 1b) will be followed to understand the relationships among dose, exposure, toxicity, tolerability and clinical activity, to identify minimally active dose, and to select the recommended dose(s) for phase 2 study. Up to 24 participants (12 participants per dose level) may be enrolled in Phase 1b of the study.
This is a Phase 2 Study is to determine the efficacy and safety rate of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) participants in remission with minimal residual disease (MRD) after KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy
The study is a prospective, single-arm, non-experimental, observational study in patients in Italy with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) with myelodysplastic-related changes or therapy related AML initiating treatment with JZP351 (Vyxeos liposomal) in their normal clinical practice.
Acute leukemia, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), is the subtype of leukemia with the highest mortality, and leukemia relapse caused by the protective bone marrow microenvironment is the main cause of treatment failure. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 plays a crucial role in the homing and settling of leukemia cells into the bone marrow. Preclinical study of the investigators demonstrates that CXCR4 blockade can mobilize leukemia cells from their protective bone marrow microenvironment to periphery, thereby significantly enhancing the killing effect of allogeneic lymphocytes against leukemia cells. This study aims to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) plus CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor in the treatment of relapsed acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) through a prospective single arm study. The results may preliminarily confirm the effectiveness and safety of DLI combined with plerixafor in the treatment of recurrent acute leukemia patients after allo-HSCT, providing a reference basis for further research.
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and efficacy of cytokine induced memory-like (CIML) natural killer (NK) cells expanded with Interleukin-2 (IL-2) at preventing relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or MDS and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndrome after a standard-of-care stem cell transplant. Names of the study therapies involved in this study are: - CIML NK cells intravenous infusion (cellular therapy) - Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 (recombinant, human glycoprotein)
This is a Phase 1/2, global multicentre, open-label, single-arm, dose escalation and dose optimisation study of AZD0486 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AZD0486 monotherapy in participants with R/R B ALL who have received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapies. The study will consist of 3 parts. Part A monotherapy dose escalation. Part B dose optimisation. Part C Dose expansion at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D)
The goal of this study is to evaluate nemtabrutinib compared with investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. The primary hypotheses are that (1) nemtabrutinib is non-inferior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to objective response rate (ORR) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Criteria 2018 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and (2) nemtabrutinib is superior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per iwCLL Criteria 2018 by BICR.
The use of venetoclax-based therapies for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory malignancies is increasingly common outside of the clinical trial setting. For patients who cannot swallow tablets, it is common to crush the tablets and dissolve them in liquid to create a solution. However, no PK data exists in adults or children using crushed tablets dissolved in liquid in this manner, and as a result, the venetoclax exposure with this solution is unknown. Primary Objectives • To determine the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax when commercially available tablets are crushed and dissolved into a solution Secondary Objectives - To determine the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax solution in patients receiving concomitant strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors - To determine potential pharmacokinetic differences based on route of venetoclax solution administration (ie. PO vs NG tube vs G-tube) - To determine the concentration of venetoclax in cerebral spinal fluid when administered as an oral solution