View clinical trials related to Leukemia.
Filter by:This trial is a single-center, non-blind, two-arm randomized prospective controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two induction chemotherapy regimens (high-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin [HDAC] vs. cytarabine plus high-dose daunorubicin [AD]) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary hypothesis of the study is that AD is superior to HDAC in terms of event-free survival (EFS, time from registration to induction failure, relapse, or death).
This phase Ib/II clinical trial studies the side effects and best dose of venetoclax and how well it works when given together with vincristine liposomal in treating patients with T-cell or B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back or does not respond to treatment. Venetoclax may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine liposomal, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving venetoclax together with vincristine liposomal may work better in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Assessment of the mutational profile of the residual clone and the distribution of lymphocyte subpopulations at 3 years of treatment with ibrutinib This project has an epidemiological part: to establish the percentage of patients, in a real-life situation, still undergoing treatment 3 years after its initiation, as well as a biological part: to determine the evolution of the clone and the prevalence of BTK mutations and PLCg2 in the absence of clinical or biological criteria for scalability.
Early Access Programme to provide treatment access to moxetumomab pasudotox for eligible patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia
1. To assess the incidence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in adult AML patients, and to explore their associations with the patients' clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characteristics as well as with treatment response and outcome. 2. To delineate the similarities and distinctions among mutations at IDH1-R132, IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172 in AML, both clinically and molecularly (including cytogenetics, immunophenotyping, mutation co-occurrence patterns). 3. The results can be references for future selection of targeted therapy (targeting IDH mutant proteins).
Methodology: Prospective, multicentric, open, non-randomised, non-therapeutic, interventional study
The purpose of this clinical trial is to identify 50 participants with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and follow their total white blood cell (WBC) counts and absolute lymphocyte counts after performing dermal chelation and administering nutritional therapy
This phase I studies the side effects and best dose of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation when given together with fludarabine and melphalan before donor stem cell transplant in treating participants with high-risk acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Giving chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and melphalan, and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cells in the bone marrow, including normal blood-forming cells (stem cells) and cancer cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.
Background: Acute leukemia is a life threatening hematological malignancy which can result in substantial symptom burden including impaired psychological wellbeing. Peer-to-peer support has positive and beneficial effects on patients with cancer. Yet there is lack of knowledge and evidence of the feasibility and the effect of peer-to-peer support on patient with acute leukemia Aims: The study aim to examine the feasibility and safety of Patient Ambassador Support in newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia during treatment, and to examine the benefit on symptoms and psychological wellbeing in both patients and ambassadors. Design and methods: This study is a one arm feasibility intervention trial with patients n=40; patient ambassadors (PA) n=30. Patients will be consecutively recruited at the Departments of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and Sjællands Universitetshospital, Roskilde, and paired with a PA who will follow and assist the patient over the course of two series of chemotherapy for a 12 week period, with one follow-up contact at 3 month. Data is collected at baseline (within 2 weeks of diagnosis), post intervention (12 weeks) and follow-up 6 months. Implication: This study has the potential to be a new model for care incorporated in the oncology/hematology clinical care setting, creating an active partnership between patients and former patients; and in collaboration with the health care professionals which may strengthen the existing care and support system.
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) is a group of blood disorders where the bone marrow does not produce enough mature red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets. In a healthy person, the bone marrow makes blood stem cells (immature cells, also called 'blasts') that become mature blood cells over time. In people with MDS, this process is affected and immature blood cells in the bone marrow do not mature fully to become healthy blood cells. This causes a lack of healthy blood cells that can function properly. With fewer healthy blood cells, infection, anaemia, or easy bleeding may occur. MDS can progress to acute myeloid leukaemia in 25-30% of patients, and if untreated it can be rapidly fatal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the standard treatment, azacitidine (Vidaza) given as an injection under the skin compared to the same medication (called CC-486) taken as a tablet by mouth. Vidaza is approved by the Australian Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) as standard treatment for MDS. CC-486 is an experimental treatment. This means it is not an approved treatment for MDS in Australia. CC-486 is being developed to increase convenience and make it easier for patients to continue their treatment. So far it has been given to over 870 patients in studies across the world. The treatment in the injection and the tablet is the same. Studies like this one are being done to ensure the tablet works in the same way as the standard injected treatment. Vidaza is given by subcutaneous injection (ie under the skin) over an hour for 7 days every 4 weeks for as long as it continues to work. All study participants will receive active treatment (there is no placebo), and all participants will receive the standard injection for six treatment cycles followed by the new tablet medication taken once daily for 21 days every 4 weeks. This allows the researchers to compare the two ways of giving the medicine.