Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05554822
Other study ID # 2021-000730-34
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date June 14, 2021
Est. completion date December 31, 2023

Study information

Verified date September 2022
Source Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
Contact Giuseppe Patti, MD
Phone +3903213733597
Email chiara.ghiglieno@uniupo.it
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will perform a randomized, head-to-head comparison between SAPT (aspirin) and DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) after percutaneous LAA closure with implantation of the Amulet device (AbbottTM, Abbott Park, Illinois, US) in patients with AF. Primary outcome measure will be a net composite endpoint at 6 months including all-cause death, DRT, clinically relevant bleeding complications and ischemic events. The SAPT arm will receive aspirin alone up to 6 months, while the DAPT arm will receive DAPT for 3 months and then aspirin alone. Thus, between 3- and 6-month follow-up both groups will be given aspirin alone.


Description:

State of the art There is no clear evidence on optimal antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There is a consensus supporting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel (without oral anticoagulation) after non-WATCHMAN device implantation. However, the use of DAPT after LAA closure was initially derived from other interventional settings (e.g. the antithrombotic approach used after coronary stenting) and available data essentially derive from observational (and often retrospective), non-randomized, studies. Due to the lack of robust and consolidated evidence, the type and duration of antiplatelet therapy after LAA closure are variable and often guided by the individual convincement of the treating physicians. Patients undergoing LAA closure are generally older and have multiple co-morbidities; thus, in these patients the risk of bleeding events is a major concern and antithrombotic therapy may strongly contribute to such risk. Single-center, observational data have suggested that a strategy with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, essentially aspirin, without P2Y12 inhibitor) is associated with similar risk of ischemic cerebral events and device-related thrombosis (DRT) and with a significant reduction of bleeding complications after the intervention with 68% reduction in risk of major bleeding (from 7.0% to 2.3%). However, a recent, retrospective evidence raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of SAPT in preventing DRT in this setting of patients. To date, no randomized study has evaluated whether an approach with SAPT, compared to DAPT, is associated with adequate protection from DRT/ischemic events and with decreased bleeding risk. We will address such issue in a randomized, prospective, multicenter study. Aim of the study The study will perform a randomized, head-to-head comparison between SAPT (aspirin) and DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) after percutaneous LAA closure with implantation of the Amulet device (AbbottTM, Abbott Park, Illinois, US) in patients with AF. Primary outcome measure will be a net composite endpoint at 6 months including all-cause death, DRT, clinically relevant bleeding complications and ischemic events. The SAPT arm will receive aspirin alone up to 6 months, while the DAPT arm will receive DAPT for 3 months and then aspirin alone. Thus, between 3- and 6-month follow-up both groups will be given aspirin alone. We consider that a 6-month follow-up would be more than enough to detect any possible difference between the two groups. Primary objective: To demonstrate that SAPT is not inferior to the current standard antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after LAA closure regarding the cumulative incidence of the net composite endpoint, including death, thrombotic complications and bleeding events, at 6 months. Secondary objectives: Compared to DAPT, SAPT use is associated with a similar incidence of ischemic events and a significantly lower incidence of bleeding complications at 6 months. Study design The study will be phase IV, prospective, multicenter, with 1:1 randomization, open-label, with parallel groups. Consecutive patients with AF undergoing percutaneous LAA closure with the Amulet device will be enrolled. Patients will be included regardless of the type of AF and of clinical indication for LAA closure. Approximately 15 centers with a consolidated experience in the procedure of percutaneous LAA closure will be included. Enrollment will be competitive; each center will include a maximum number of patients corresponding to the 20% of the global population. After the protocol approval, the high-volume centers (e.g. top implanting centers in Italy) will be asked to participate the study, in addition to the Coordinating Center.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 574
Est. completion date December 31, 2023
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Men or women aged =18 years signing a specific informed consent - Patients with a planned percutaneous LAA closure; - Patients with documented non-valvular AF, irrespective of the type (paroxysmal, permanent, persistent), and CHA2DS2-VASc score =2 - Patients suitable for treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel according to the Summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs); - Patients considered unsuitable for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy due to a high bleeding risk. Patients will be judged unsuitable for anticoagulation because of bleeding-prone comorbidities, history of previous bleeding (with or without anticoagulant treatment) or an expected low adherence to therapy. - Patient's availability to undergo the follow-up visits scheduled for the study - Negative pregnancy testing (if applicable), performed at the time of enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: - CHADS-VAsc score 0-1 - Requirement for on-going therapy with clopidogrel at the time of screening evaluation (e.g. current therapy with clopidogrel at the time of the screening evaluation will be an exclusion criterion) - Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs (aspirin or clopidogrel) - Patients deemed to be unsuitable for at least 6 months antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) because of a recent (<1 month) major bleeding event - Planned oral anticoagulant therapy after the procedure - Moderate to severe mitral stenosis - Mechanical heart prosthetic valve - Active endocarditis - Active bleeding - Myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention <6 months - Major surgery within one month - Intracranial neoplasm, aneurysm or arterio-venous malformation - Platelet count <50,000/µL - Recent stroke (<1 month) - Fibrinolytic therapy within 10 days - Baseline hemoglobin <9 g/dL - Pregnant woman - Breast-feeding - Women unavailable to use contraception during the study period

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Aspirin 100mg
Single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 100 mg OD for 6 months after the procedure
Aspirin 100 mg OD plus clopidogrel 75 mg OD
Double antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin 100 mg OD plus clopidogrel 75 mg OD for 3 months, followed by 3 months of single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 100 mg OD.

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Presidio Ospedaliero G. Rodolico Catania
Italy Presidi Ospedalieri Riuniti ASL 6 Ciriè - Presidio Ospedaliero Riunito Sede di Ciriè Ciriè
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Firenze
Italy ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milano
Italy Centro Cardiologico Fondazione Monzino Milano
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli Monaldi Napoli
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II Napoli
Italy Ospedale Maggiore della Carità Novara
Italy Clinica San Carlo Paderno Dugnano
Italy Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma Parma
Italy Policlinico San Matteo Pavia
Italy Ospedale del Cuore G. Pasquinucci Pisa
Italy Ospedale di Rivoli Rivoli
Italy Ospedale S. Eugenio - ASL Roma 2 Roma
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sassari Sassari
Italy Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I Torino
Italy Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco Torino
Italy Villa Maria Pia Hospital Torino
Italy Ospedale Sant'Andrea Vercelli

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita Abbott Medical Devices

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Primary endpoint:all-cause death, DRT (at 3- or 6-month TEE), ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events (SEE) or BARC classification bleeding =3. Primary endpoint will be the 6-month incidence in the two arms (SAPT versus DAPT) of the net composite endpoint including all-cause death, DRT (at 3- or 6-month TEE), ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events (SEE) or BARC classification bleeding =3. An independent board for clinical event adjudication and data safety monitoring will be created. 6 months
Secondary Secondary endpoint: Device-related thrombosis Device-related thrombosis evaluated with transesophageal echocardiogram At 3 months and at 6 months
Secondary Secondary endpoint: Any-cause death Any-cause death 6 months
Secondary Secondary endpoint: ischemic stroke or systemic embolic events Incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) At 3 months and at 6 months
Secondary Secondary endpoint: Any bleeding Incidence of any bleeding At 3 months and at 6 months
Secondary Secondary endpoint: BARC =3 bleeding Incidence of BARC classification bleeding =3 At 3 months and at 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03987945 - Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation From Shanghai
Completed NCT05632445 - Apixaban vs Dual Antiplatet Therapy Study After Left Atrial Appendage Occlosure (ADALA) Phase 4
Terminated NCT00841529 - Evaluation of the Cardioblate Closure Device in Facilitating Occlusion of the Left Atrial Appendage Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT04897204 - Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation N/A
Recruiting NCT04524741 - Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography or Left Atrial Appendage Radiography to Guide Implantation of a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device N/A
Recruiting NCT04524780 - Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography or Left Atrial Appendage Radiography to Guide Implantation of a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device. N/A
Withdrawn NCT05399342 - Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study III Extended Follow Up
Completed NCT05136417 - Study of Intra-Cardiac Echocardiography in Guiding Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With the Watchman Device N/A
Recruiting NCT05671276 - Efficacy of Different Anti-Thrombotic Strategies on the Incidence of Silent Cerebral Embolism After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06060912 - LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs N/A
Recruiting NCT04502017 - Efficacy of Different Anti-Thrombotic Strategies on Device-Related Thrombosis Prevention After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Phase 4