3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy of Ovarian Cyst

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Lack of depth perception and spatial orientation are drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery. The advent of the three-dimensional (3D) camera system enables surgeons to regain binocular vision. The aim of this study was to gain subjective and objective data to determine whether 3D systems are superior to two-dimensional (2D) systems in terms of surgical outcomes.

Clinical Trial Description

Elective laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is established as the treatment of choice for benign ovarian cysts. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery over conventional open surgery are less pain, shorter recovery time, shorter hospital stay, and consequently faster return to normal activity as well as better cosmetic effects. However, laparoscopic surgery is more challenging compared with open surgery, partly because surgeons must operate in a three-dimensional (3D) space through a two-dimensional (2D) projection on a monitor, which results in loss of depth perception and consequently more cognitive workload on the surgeon. In traditional 2D laparoscopic procedures, the surgeon has to mentally transform and process the 2D image into a 3D image using motion parallax through movement of the laparoscope, relative position of instruments, and shading of light and dark. During the past 3 decades, 3D imaging systems have been introduced in and attempt to improve in-depth perception and spatial orientation during minimally invasive surgery. The anticipated advantages for the surgeon are greater accuracy and speed in manual skills, translating to decreased operative time, a reduced learning curve, and enhanced safety.

Nevertheless, studies, to date, examining the potential advantages and disadvantages of 3D versus 2D imaging systems have produced contradictory results. Moreover, there have been no studies exploring the advantage of 3D imaging system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. The aim of this study was to gain subjective and objective data to determine whether 3D imaging systems in the treatment of ovarian cyst are superior to 2D systems in terms of surgical outcomes. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03453333
Study type	Interventional
Source	Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 10, 2018
Completion date	March 12, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04515485` - A Volumetric Nomogram for Height, Weight, and Intra Abdominal Volume
Completed	`NCT01725477` - Laparoscopic Tubal Patency Assessment	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01093079` - Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01093430` - Is the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine a Useful Landmark at Laparoscopy?	N/A
Completed	`NCT00535990` - Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
Completed	`NCT01092013` - Comparative Evaluation of Simulator Based and Traditional In-surgery Laparoscopic Camera Training's Efficiency in Novices	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06044909` - Multimodal Image Registration for Helping Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Guidance
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05389241` - Laparoscopic Augmented Reality for Identification of Liver Lesions - a Pre-clinical Randomized Cross-over Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT06255080` - Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT03234543` - Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02827292` - Effect of Music on Inflammatory Response During Laparoscopic Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06092684` - The Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine in Elective Laparoscopic Surgery	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT01008709` - Comparison Study of Two Different Surgical Clips During Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05363813` - Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of Reusable Clip Applier Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03330236` - EEG - Guided Anesthetic Care and Postoperative Delirium	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05031182` - Tolerance of the vNOTES Surgical Technique in Total Hysterectomy for Benign Lesion. Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority Compared to the Laparoscopic Technique.	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05302622` - Detecting the Most Efficient Residency Time for Laparoscopic Simulators	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03684291` - Hemodynamic Effects of Ventilation Modes
Recruiting	`NCT06117748` - Volume-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume Guaranteed in Obese Patients in Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03739944` - Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer	Phase 3

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy of Ovarian Cyst — LOOC

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms