Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of two peritoneal entry techniques on intraoperative and post-operative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon. Patients will be randomized to either blunt fascial or veress needle peritoneal entry. Insufflation times, failed entries, complications and post-operative pain scores will be collected. The investigators hypothesize that the blunt entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times and similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with the veress needle entry technique. Primary Objective: To evaluate the insufflation times and success upon peritoneal entry according to peritoneal entry technique. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes and patients pain scores according to peritoneal entry technique.

Clinical Trial Description

This will be a single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of peritoneal entry technique on insufflation times, entry failure, post-operative pain and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the blunt fascial entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times with no effect on other surgical outcomes. The study will include 2 groups corresponding to the entry techniques: blunt facial entry and Veress needle entry. Participants will be 1:1 allocated to each technique by block randomization. Blunt fascial entry technique description: a 5 mm incision is made in the umbilicus. Next, a curved Kelly forceps is used to open the fascia, and, if possible, the peritoneum. The Kelly forceps are then used to expand the opening to a 10 mm diameter. A 5 mm trocar is placed into the fascial hole and used to quickly insufflate the abdomen to 15 mm Hg. Once the abdomen is fully insufflated, a 10 mm trocar is placed using optical guidance. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Laparoscopic Surgery

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06305975
Study type	Interventional
Source	Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Contact	Raanan Meyer, MD
Phone	3104234073
Email	Raanan.Meyer@cshs.org
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	March 2024
Completion date	March 1, 2025

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT01114971` - Labetalol and Esmolol: Vital Signs and Post Operative Pain Management	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05624346` - The Effect of Respiratory Exercise After Laparoscopic Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04999696` - Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer	N/A
Completed	`NCT01084200` - Comparison of Sevoflurane, Propofol, and Sevoflurane Plus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT00731107` - XCEL Bladeless Trocar Versus Veress Needle: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing These Two Entry Techniques in Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery.	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06050161` - Evaluating Artisential Laparoscopic Instruments in Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05005117` - Laparoscopic Approach for Emergency Colon Resection	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05436899` - A Pilot Study on Training Simulator Efficacy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05542823` - Effect of Cuff Pressure of Endotracheal Tube on POST
Terminated	`NCT03684304` - The Effect of Abdominal Binder Use on Postoperative Pain and Mobility in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT04146090` - Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01436032` - Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of N1539 in Subjects After Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery	Phase 3
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05109130` - Change of Circulating Tumor Cells During Laparoscopic or Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
Completed	`NCT04642118` - Low-pressure Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver to Decrease Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06150079` - Individualized PEEP Titration on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications	N/A
Completed	`NCT05121454` - Validation of Serenno CUO and IAP Measuring Device
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05092425` - Analysis of Risk Factors for Children With Heterochronous Indirect Hernia
Recruiting	`NCT03318185` - Gasless Single-port Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Carcinoma	N/A
Completed	`NCT03506555` - Laparoscopic Access in General Surgery: the Closed (Veress Needle) Technique Versus the Open (Hasson) Technique	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02769325` - Atropine in Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgery	Phase 4

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery — BluntFascial

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms