View clinical trials related to Labor Induction.
Filter by:Amniotomy (breaking the bag of water) is commonly used in the induction of labor. However, the timing is highly variable. The purpose of this study is to determine if first time mothers undergoing induction of labor with a Foley catheter experience a decrease in their labor time when undergoing early amniotomy (breaking the bag of water within 1 hour of Foley catheter removal) than when undergoing delayed amniotomy (breaking the bag of water at least 4 hours after Foley catheter removal). Other aims include the relationship between timing of amniotomy and cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine infection, neonatal Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal need for intensive care. The investigators hypothesize that induction of labor with Foley catheters followed by early amniotomy will result in a decreased duration of labor compared to those who undergo delayed amniotomy.
Effıcacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double- balloon catheter among women in the induction of labor
Obese pregnant women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) are more likely than their normal-weight counterparts to require induction of labor because of increased rates of obstetric complications including pregnancy related hypertensive disorders, diabetes, and prolonged gestations. Several studies have shown that obese women experience increased labor duration and oxytocin needs when compared to normal-weight women. This in turn results in increased rates for unplanned cesarean delivery (CD) as a result of failed induction of labor (IOL), arrest disorders and non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, that is dose-dependent with increasing class of obesity. The investigators hypothesize that obese pregnant women and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 6), IOL ≥ 24 weeks gestation using the Foley balloon plus vaginal misoprostol will result in reduced cesarean delivery rates when compared to vaginal misoprostol alone.
This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the abortion interval of second-trimester termination of pregnancy using misoprostol.
The current study is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of Obstetric Cook Catheter combined with oral misoprostol for induction of labor in pregnant patients. The primary outcome to be studied is vaginal delivery rate for the Obstetric Cook Catheter in combination with oral placebo and the Obstetric Cook Catheter in combination with oral misoprostol. Secondary outcomes to be studied include the safety of the method, composite maternal morbidity and composite neonatal morbidity. The hypothesis is that there is a higher vaginal delivery rate in the patient whom receive both the Obstetric Cook Catheter and the oral misoprostol.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of transcervical Foley catheter compared to controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) for cervical ripening in term and near term women presenting for labor induction. HYPOTHESIS: In term and near term women presenting for labor induction, transcervical Foley catheter will decrease the mean time from induction to delivery by six hours compared to controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™).
To compare the efficacy of transcervical double balloon catheters versus controlled release dinoprostone vaginal inserts for pre-induction cervical ripening in term women with unfavourable cervices.
The purpose of the trial is to compare nipple stimulation with a breast pump to pitocin for induction of labor in term pregnancies.
The investigators propose to perform a prospective randomized control trial to compare the rate of cesarean delivery in women where Oxytocin (OT) is discontinued once active labor begins (5 cm dilation) when compared with women where OT is continued at a maintenance level per the usual protocol. One study group will follow an oxytocin protocol which is incremental until 5 cm dilation and then maintained at the same level throughout labor. The second arm will follow an oxytocin protocol also incremental, but then discontinued once the cervix is 5 cm. The primary outcome will be the rate of cesarean delivery between the groups. Secondary outcomes to be evaluated will include duration of the labor, fetal heart rate abnormalities, and frequency of uterine hyperstimulation, maternal and neonatal outcomes. As mentioned in the study proposal, the proposed experimental arm is currently not performed as part of the oxytocin guidelines at the investigators' institution. One study from Israel suggests no difference in pregnancy outcomes with the proposed use of oxytocin. Although some providers stop the oxytocin in active labor for their patients, this is not a commonly performed procedure at the investigators' institution. The investigators are not aware of other institutions employing the above practice.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy for cervical ripening in labor induction between titrated and conventional oral misoprostol