A Study to Compare How the Body Absorbs and Processes Two Different Formulations of the Anti-rejection Medication Tacrolimus (Advagraf® or Prograf®) in Children Receiving an Organ Transplant, and How Safe and Effective They Are Over a Longer Period of Time

Kidney Transplantation Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Phase II, Parallel Group, Randomized, Multicentre, Open Label Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in De Novo Pediatric Allograft Recipients Treated With an Advagraf® or Prograf® Based Immunosuppressive Regimen, Including a Long-Term Follow-Up

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01614665
• Other study ID #: PMR-EC-1207
• Secondary ID: 2011-000078-80
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: April 3, 2012
• Est. completion date: April 21, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: July 2022
• Source: Astellas Pharma Inc
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare how the body absorbs and processes two different formulations of the anti-rejection medication tacrolimus (Advagraf® or Prograf®) in children receiving an organ transplant, and how safe and effective they are over a longer period of time. This study is for children less than 16 years old. No minimum age has been set, however, to be included in this study participants must able to swallow the medication capsules intact.

Description:

Participants undergoing primary heart, kidney or liver transplantation and meeting the Inclusion Criteria and complying with the Exclusion Criteria prior to initiation of tacrolimus therapy will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized to treatment with either Advagraf® or Prograf®. The randomization will be on a 1:1 basis stratified by organ and centre. The study is divided in to two parts: Part A: The initial pharmacokinetic part of the study. Part B: A long term follow-up of one year. The main objective of Part A of the study is to collect PK data following administration of Advagraf® and Prograf® in de novo pediatric allograft recipients. Part B allows comparison of the safety and efficacy profiles of Advagraf® vs. Prograf® for longer term (52 weeks) post allograft transplantation. Part C: Continuation of long-term follow-up (from Day 365 onwards). Participants who have completed Part B and to whom continued treatment with Advagraf® is not currently available, will be offered participation in a continuation of long-term follow-up Part C. Part C will continue until Advagraf® becomes available to these participants or these participants' discontinuation, whichever is the earliest. This applies to participants in the following countries: Czech Republic, Italy, UK and Poland only.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 44
• Est. completion date: April 21, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: April 21, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A to 15 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• The subject is aged <16 years of age, undergoing primary liver, kidney or heart allograft transplantation
• The subject must be able to swallow intact Prograf® or Advagraf® capsules
• Subjects, treated since transplantation with Basiliximab or ATG/ Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)/steroids, whose gastric motility has resumed and whose renal function is adequate on Day 1 (Heart only)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subject is receiving a multi-organ transplant or has previously received an organ transplant (including re-transplantation)
• Subject with pulmonary vascular resistance =4 Wood units despite medication
• Subject with significant renal impairment, defined as having serum creatinine =230 µmol/l (=2.6 mg/dl) pre-transplantation. (Not applicable for renal transplanted subjects)
• Subject with significant liver disease, defined as having continuously elevated SGPT/ALT and/or SGOT/AST and/or total bilirubin levels of =3 times the upper value of the normal range of the investigational site during the past 28 days. (Not applicable for liver transplanted subjects)
• Subject with malignancies or a history of malignancy within the last 5 years, with the exception of those with basalioma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully. (Not applicable for transplanted subjects with a primary organ diagnosis of cancer)
• Subject requiring systemic immunosuppressive medication for any other indication than transplantation

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Heart Transplantation
• Kidney Transplantation
• Liver Transplantation

Intervention

Drug:
• Tacrolimus
Participants receive an initial total daily dose of tacrolimus depending on the type of organ transplant (heart = 0.075 mg/kg; liver/kidney = 0.3 mg/kg), to be given orally (or via nasogastric tube for liver transplant recipients) in 2 doses in the morning and the evening. The first dose is administered in the morning within days of skin closure (heart = 4 days; liver = 2 days; kidney = within 24 hours following reperfusion). Subsequent tacrolimus doses are taken orally twice a day in the morning and evening and are adjusted on the basis of clinical evidence of efficacy, occurrence of adverse events and observing the recommended whole blood trough level ranges (day 1 through 21 = 10 to 20 ng/mL; day 22 through 365 = 5 to 15 ng/mL).
• Tacrolimus prolonged release
Participants receive an initial total daily dose of tacrolimus prolonged release depending on the type of organ transplant (heart = 0.075 mg/kg; liver/kidney = 0.3 mg/kg), to be given orally (or via nasogastric tube for liver transplant recipients) in 1 dose. The first dose is administered in the morning within days of skin closure (heart = 4 days; liver = 2 days; kidney = within 24 hours following reperfusion). Subsequent tacrolimus prolonged release doses are taken orally once a day in the morning and are adjusted on the basis of clinical evidence of efficacy, occurrence of adverse events and observing the recommended whole blood trough level ranges (day 1 through 21 = 10 to 20 ng/mL; day 22 through 365 = 5 to 15 ng/mL).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Czechia	Site CZ61	Prague 5
France	Site FR33	Bron Cedex
France	Site FR32	Paris Cedex 15
Italy	Site IT52	Rome
Poland	Site PL71	Warsaw
United Kingdom	Site GB43	Birmingham
United Kingdom	Site GB46	Liverpool
United Kingdom	Site GB44	London
United Kingdom	Site GB45	London
United Kingdom	Site GB42	Manchester

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Czechia,  France,  Italy,  Poland,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve from Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for Tacrolimus (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28 at predose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours postdose
Primary	Number of Participants with Adverse Events (Part A + B)	Safety is assessed by adverse events (AEs), which includes abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc.) if the abnormality induces clinical signs or symptoms, needs active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or is clinically significant. A serious AE (SAE) is an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization or is considered medically important.	From first dose of study drug up to 7 days after last dose of study drug in Part B (up to 53 weeks)
Primary	Number of Participants with Adverse Events (Part C)	Safety is assessed by adverse events (AEs), which includes abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc.) if the abnormality induces clinical signs or symptoms, needs active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or is clinically significant. A serious AE (SAE) is an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization or is considered medically important.	Up to 9 years
Secondary	Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Tacrolimus (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28 at predose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours postdose
Secondary	Time to Attain Maximum Concentration (tmax) of Tacrolimus (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28 at predose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours postdose
Secondary	Trough Concentration (C12) for Tacrolimus (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28, 12 hours after dosing
Secondary	Trough Concentration (C24) for Tacrolimus (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28, 24 hours after dosing
Secondary	Correlation between AUC24 & C24 (Part A)		Days 1, 7 and 28 at predose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 24 hours postdose
Secondary	Number of Participants with Acute Rejections (Part A + B)	Rejection episodes/acute rejections are indicated by clinical and/or laboratory signs, and are classified according to their rejection specific treatment: •Spontaneously Resolving Acute Rejection: not treated with new or increased corticosteroid medication, antibodies or any other medication and resolved, irrespective of any tacrolimus dose changes; •Corticosteroid Sensitive Acute Rejection: treated with new or increased corticosteroid medication only and which has resolved, irrespective of any tacrolimus dose changes; •Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection: did not resolve following treatment with corticosteroids; - Resolved with further treatment: any acute rejection with an end date AND a treatment other than corticosteroid used; - Unresolved with further treatment: any acute rejection with no end date AND a treatment other than corticosteroid used; - Unresolved with no further treatment: any acute rejection with no end date AND ONLY corticosteroid treatment was used.	Up to Week 52
Secondary	Number of Participants with Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection Episodes (BPARs) (Part A + B)	BPAR episodes are defined as acute rejection episodes confirmed by biopsy, and are classified according to their rejection specific treatment: •Spontaneously Resolving Acute Rejection: not treated with new or increased corticosteroid medication, antibodies or any other medication and resolved, irrespective of any tacrolimus dose changes; •Corticosteroid Sensitive Acute Rejection: treated with new or increased corticosteroid medication only and which has resolved, irrespective of any tacrolimus dose changes; •Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection: did not resolve following treatment with corticosteroids; - Resolved with further treatment: any acute rejection with an end date AND a treatment other than corticosteroid used; - Unresolved with further treatment: any acute rejection with no end date AND a treatment other than corticosteroid used; - Unresolved with no further treatment: any acute rejection with no end date AND ONLY corticosteroid treatment used.	Up to Week 52
Secondary	Severity of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection Episodes (Part A + B)	The severity of BPARs is categorized with specific criteria by organ: For kidney transplant participants, according to Banff '97 Diagnostic categories for renal allograft biopsies - Banff '07 update (C4d deposition, Acute antibody-mediated rejection I, II, and III, Acute T cell mediated rejection IA, IB, IIA, IIB and III); for liver transplant participants, according to 1997 Banff Schema for Grading of Liver Allograft Rejection - Rejection Activity Index (mild, moderate, severe or indeterminate/borderline); for heart, according to Standardized Nomenclature of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation - Standardised Cardiac Biopsy Grading: Acute Cellular Rejection 2004 (mild, moderate, severe).	Up to Week 52
Secondary	Patient Survival (Part A + B)	Patient survival is defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of death from any cause.	Up to Week 52
Secondary	Graft Survival (Part A + B)	Graft survival is defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to graft loss. Graft loss is defined as retransplantation, nephrectomy (in case of kidney transplantation), death or dialysis (in case of kidney transplantation) ongoing at end of study or at discontinuation, unless superseded by follow-up information.	Up to Week 52
Secondary	Efficacy Failure (Part A + B)	Efficacy failure is defined as the composite of the following: death, graft loss, BPAR and unknown outcome. A participant is considered to have an unknown outcome if he/she does not have the event of interest (death, graft loss, BPAR) or does not have a study assessment prior to day 335.	Up to Week 52

External Links

•   Link to plain language summary of the study on the Trial Results Summaries website.
•   Link to results and other applicable study documents on the Astellas Clinical Trials website.