Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

ICU patients experience moderate to severe pain. Studies and guidelines point out the benefits of multimodal analgesia on pain control, opioid spare and on lowering its adverse effects. However, no recommendation about drugs or protocol has been formulated. In our study, investigators studied the feasibility and the impact on Remifentanil spare of a standardized protocol using multimodal analgesia (Paracetamol, Nefopam, Tramadol, Ketamine, Remifentanil) compared to the standard-of-care strategy using Paracetamol and Remifentanil. The investigators conducted a prospective, ''proof of concept'', randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial. The investigators studied multimodal analgesia versus standard-of-care in ICU patients requiring sedation-analgesia for invasive mechanical ventilation.The investigators hypothesized that Remifentanil consumption decrease by 15% with the use of a standardized multimodal analgesia strategy


Clinical Trial Description

ICU patients requiring sedation-analgesia for mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours are randomized in 2 parallel groups : control arm using ''standard of care'' analgesia (Paracetamol and Remifentanil), and interventional arm using multimodal analgesia at different level according to pain accessed by BPS (Step 1 : Paracetamol, Nefopam, Tramadol, Step 2 : Ketamine, Step 3 : Remifentanil). Sedation drugs are standard of care (Propofol and Midazolam if Propofol isn't enough) to obtain prescribed sedation accessed by RASS. Double-bling is kept for 72 hours until the primary outcome is obtained. The investigators hypothesize a 15% reduction of Remifentanil consumption in the interventional group. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05825560
Study type Interventional
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Contact Remy WIDEHEM, Dr.
Phone +33 4.66 68 30 50
Email remy.widehem@chu-nimes.fr
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
Start date May 15, 2023
Completion date August 15, 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Suspended NCT04253795 - Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02864017 - Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900807 - CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
Completed NCT01823328 - Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01170455 - Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device N/A
Completed NCT00980590 - Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground N/A
Completed NCT05515107 - The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children N/A
Completed NCT06249659 - Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
Completed NCT03677505 - KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03328182 - Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder N/A
Recruiting NCT02277405 - Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Recruiting NCT02073786 - Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation N/A
Recruiting NCT02277652 - Endotracheal Intubation Devices N/A
Completed NCT02277418 - Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT00956592 - Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01003327 - Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25 Phase 4
Completed NCT00783731 - Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED) N/A
Recruiting NCT03887897 - First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope N/A