Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01474213
Other study ID # JYMZK-002
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received October 31, 2011
Last updated October 22, 2012
Start date November 2011
Est. completion date January 2012

Study information

Verified date October 2012
Source Shanghai 9th People's Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the sedation effect of dexmedetomidine and target controlled remifentanil for awake nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation in patients undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery.


Description:

Awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation is an effective technique for the management of patients with difficult airways undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery. Both optimal intubating conditions and patient comfort are paramount while preparing the patient for fibreoptic intubation. One challenge associated with procedure is to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patients' airway ventilation. Dexmedetomidine, because of its sedative,analgesic properties and minimal influence on patients' ventilation, might be a useful management for it. While with the development of target controlled infusion (TCI) technology, remifentanil sedation becomes a potential sedation in clinical practice.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 42
Est. completion date January 2012
Est. primary completion date January 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- ASA grade I-III adult patients with difficult airway, who were undergoing elective oral maxillofacial surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- pregnant or lactating female,

- long-term opioids or sedative medication,

- patients < 18 years of age,

- severe bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min),

- hypotension (systolic pressure < 90mmHg),

- any type of atrioventricular block on the ECG

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
dexmedetomidine group
1-1.5cmg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion within 10 minutes, while followed by maintainly infusing 0.7cmg/kg/min dexmedetomidine
remifentanil group
target controlled 3.5-4ng/ml remifentanil infused(blood plasma concentration)

Locations

Country Name City State
China Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine Shanghai Shanghai
China Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine Shanghai Shanghai

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Shanghai 9th People's Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Endoscopy Scores Endoscopy was graded from 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating a possibly better condition.
Endoscopy score 0 1 2 3 4 5: 1)Grimacing 2)localising 3)Coughing on lignocaine via scope 4)Coughing on entering infraglottic space 5)Prolonged coughing
during the procedure of fibreoptic and tracheal intubation No
Primary Intubation Score graded from 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating better conditions Intubation score 0 1 2 3 4 5: 1)Grimacing when tube in nares 2)Localising with one limb at any stage 3)Localising with two limbs at any stage 4)Coughing on entering trachea 5)Prolonged coughing during the inserting of the tracheal tube No
Secondary Patient's Reaction to Procedure Ramsay score during the endoscopy intubation from 1 to 6. The higher scores means the deeper sedation level.
Clinical score Level of sedation
Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both
Patient is cooperative, oriented and tranquil
Patient responds to commands only
Patient exhibits a brisk response to a light glabellar (between the eyebrows) tap or loud auditory stimulus
Patient exhibits a sluggish response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
Patient exhibits no response to stimuli
the duration of intubation, an expected average of 10 minutes No
Secondary Post Operative Visit visit the patients to ensure their memory of intubation. Postoperative interview asked the patients' memory of the fiberoptic intubation Amnesia Recall of endoscopy Yes No Recall of intubation Yes No The number is the patients who remember the operation procedure. 24 hours No
Secondary Mean Arterial Blood Pressure MAP at 15 minutes before intuation, endoscopy point and intubation point between two groups were compared. 15 minutes before intubation, endoscopy point, intubation point No
Secondary Heart Rate Heart rate at 15 minutes before intuation, endoscopy point and intubation point between two groups were compared. 15 minutes before intubation, endoscopy point, intubation point No
Secondary Peripheral Oxygen Saturation(SPO2) Peripheral oxygen saturation at 15 minutes before intuation, endoscopy point and intubation point between two groups were compared. 15 minutes before intubation, endoscopy point, intubation point No
Secondary Cardiac Rhythm Number of Participants with Abnormal Cardiac Rhythm(including any type of the abnormal cardiac rhythm from 15 minutes before intubation and during the intubation procedure was recorded such as sinus arrhythm, atrial or ventricular premature beats and atrioventricular block) was recorded. 15 minutes before intubation and duration of intubation No
Secondary Post Intubation Score Post-intubation was scored from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Post-intubation score 1 2 3
Cooperative, obeying commands
Uncomfortable, GA imminent
Other(specify)
immediately after the intubation No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02922595 - Comparison of iLTS-D® and ILMA® for Intubation With Fiberoptic Control N/A
Completed NCT02051400 - Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01965938 - RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope N/A
Completed NCT02769819 - Identification of Morphological Characteristics to Predict Difficult Endotracheal Intubation Using a Flexible Fiberscope N/A
Completed NCT02362568 - Study of Interest on Cervical Ultrasound Exploration for Association With Difficult Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01692522 - Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i Versus AirQ in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT03035786 - Airway Code Calls - Survey of Management N/A
Completed NCT02290249 - Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq Phase 4
Completed NCT02326896 - MACOCHA Score Predicts Intubation Failure N/A
Completed NCT01984970 - McGrath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube Intubation N/A
Terminated NCT00464490 - Use of Dexmedetomidine to Facilitate Extubation in Surgical ICU Patients Who Failed Previous Weaning Attempts N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02430415 - Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion N/A
Completed NCT01375634 - Nasogastric Tube Insertion Using Midazolam in the Emergency Department Phase 4
Completed NCT01464489 - Intubation Time With Low Dose Rocuronium N/A
Terminated NCT01075789 - Using Lignocaine Spray and Gel to Reduce the Pain Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT02501577 - Comparison of Various Supraglottic Airway Devices for Fiberoptical Guided Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02566135 - I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie N/A
Recruiting NCT02493478 - Improving Safety and Quality of Tracheal Intubation Practice in Pediatric ICUs
Completed NCT02198742 - A Comparison Between Two Video Laryngoscopes,in Successfully Intubating Pediatric Mannequins w/wo Difficult Airways Phase 1
Completed NCT02788253 - Mallampati Classification vs Best Visible Mallampati for Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation