Clinical Trials Logo

Intubation; Difficult or Failed clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Intubation; Difficult or Failed.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05833347 Completed - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Evaluation of Difficult Laryngoscopy With Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients

Start date: May 10, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Pediatric patients pose challenges in airway management due to anatomical and physiological changes. Using recommended predictive tests for predicting difficult airway can be improved by combining them with ultrasound measurement of the anterior soft tissues of the neck. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the ultrasound measurement of anterior neck soft tissues in paediatric patients before anesthesia induction, to anticipate difficult laryngoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT05762068 Completed - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of a Physiologically Difficult Airway Using the Delphi Method (PDADelphi)

PDADelphi
Start date: April 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of this study is to review/identify the existing definition and management strategies for a physiologically difficult airway (PDA), to generate expert consensus on the various aspects of managing a patient with a PDA using the Delphi method, and to provide guidance to clinicians worldwide on safe tracheal intubation practices in patients with PDA to help improve patient outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT05721690 Completed - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation

UED-VLG
Start date: February 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The present randomized clinical trial wants to compare the efficacy and safety of UED-A videolaryngoscope to Glidescope Titanium for routinely tracheal intubation in 60 adults, in terms of successful rate, no. attempts and manoeuvre duration.

NCT ID: NCT05680909 Recruiting - Morbid Obesity Clinical Trials

Evaluation of SaCo Videolaryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese

Start date: May 20, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

SaCo videolaryngeal mask airway is a novel third generation supraglottic device allowing for continuous observation of entrance to larynx via inserted in special channel videoscope connected with cable with external monitor. In obese patients airway management can be difficult so use of new devices that improve safety and potentially efficacy of airway management is indicated. In prospective observational study the SaCo VLM will be evaluated in terms of maintaining airway patency and effectiveness of intubation through it's lumen in morbidly obese scheduled for elective general surgery under general anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT05671978 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Head Elevated Position and Hyper-angulated Video-laryngoscope Guided Intubation

Start date: January 16, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Cervical immobilization with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is recommended to prevent further neurologic injury during intubation in patients with known or suspected cervical spine injuries. However, MILS is associated with increased rates of failed tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy, because the restriction of neck flexion and head extension may prevent adequate alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes, hence adversely affecting laryngeal visualization during direct laryngoscopy. The GlideScope® (Verathon, Bothell, WA, USA) is a videolaryngoscope with an hyer-angulated blade (HA-VL), which is characterized by a sharper curvature than the Macintosh blade. The large curvature of the HA-VL allows seeing 'round the corner', which can provide indirect laryngeal visualization even with restricted neck movements . However, the HA-VL also prevents direct visualization of larynx, which make it difficult to guide the tracheal tube (TT) towards the glottis despite obtaining a good laryngeal view. Thus, the good view of the laryngeal inlet provided by videolaryngoscopes does not always lead to an easy or successful intubation. There are numerous reports in the literature of devices managing to achieve an improvement in view but still being unable to pass an TT to laryngeal inlet. Thus, the key to a successful tracheal intubation using HA-VL lies not in the laryngeal view obtained but in the ease of inserting the TT. Recent meta studies comparing alternative intubation devices with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in subjects with cervical spine immobilization reported that GlideScope® was associated with improved glottis visualization but no statistically significant differences in intubation failure or time to intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy. The sniffing position recommended for direct laryngoscopy has been reported to interfere with successful tracheal intubation with HA-VL because flexion of the neck narrows the angle between the sternum and the chin, making it more difficult to insert the HA-VL blade into mouth. In contrast, placing the patient in a 'neutral' or 'back-up head-elevated (BUHE)' position was not associated with a higher incidence of difficult laryngoscope with HA-VL. Given that the 'BUHE' position, when compared with the regular supine position, extend the safe apnoea time during direct laryngoscopy, this position seems better suited for HA-VL than neutral position. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend a specific patient position for the use of HA-VL. Previous studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggests that head elevation until the external auditory meatus and sternal notch (AM-S) are in the horizonal plane leads to better anatomic alignment of the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes. Investigators therefore hypothesized that BUHE position (to align the AM-S in horizontal plane), compared with neutral position, would allow a relatively straight passage which makes it easier to guide the TT into the laryngeal inlet (facilitates insertion of TT into the laryngeal entrance) during HA-VL guided intubation. To compare the effect of the BUHE position and the neutral position on the ease of tracheal intubation using a HA-VL (GlideScope®), MILS was applied to patients without any known or suspected neck pathology as a way of simulating a difficult airway. The primary outcome was the tracheal intubation time with both positions. Secondary outcomes examined included rates of successful tracheal intubation and intubation success rate, number of intubation attempts, heart rate responses during intubation, and handling of the Glidesope VL after alignment of the EAM and sternal notch.

NCT ID: NCT05635773 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Use of Alexa as a Cognitive Aid for Emergency Front Of Neck Access (FONA)

FONA-A
Start date: June 30, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to investigate whether a voice activated cognitive aid can improve performance in a simulated emergency front-of-neck access scenario. This skill is ideally practiced on an annual basis by anaesthetists in training, with a variety of usually low-fidelity simulation used. The addition of the Alexa cognitive aid is a novel step with the aim of improving adherence to the recommended steps required to successfully complete the procedure. One arm of this study will be introduced to the Alexa checklist in advance of performing the procedure prior to crossover, whereas the second arm will not (subject to standard anaesthetic training).

NCT ID: NCT05635500 Completed - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Clinical Comparison Between Midline and Right-sided Insertion of the Videolaryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation

Midway
Start date: August 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The videolaryngoscope is an established tool for securing the airway, even in difficult situations. It remains unclear which insertion technique is the safest and fastest in the difficult airway.

NCT ID: NCT05614609 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Postoperative Complications

Discomfort in Upper Airways Due to intubation-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: March 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Few studies have compared different methods for optimalizing intubation conditions in general anesthesia. This randomized controlled trial will compare two different methods for intubation in general anesthesia in gastro- or gynecological procedures.

NCT ID: NCT05535127 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Sequential Strategy vs Palpation vs Routine Ultrasound for Detection of Cricothyroid Membrane

EcoID
Start date: September 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

EcoID is a study designed as an adaptive controlled clinical trial with a first phase of superiority and a second phase of non-inferiority with change of control, of parallel groups, random assignment and blinding of investigators measuring outcome.

NCT ID: NCT05522049 Completed - General Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation

Start date: October 17, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation has become widespread as a means of preventing major complications relating to airway management by improving the glottic view, increasing the first attempt success rate, likely reduce rates of hypoxemic events, while reducing the rate of airway trauma. However, as randomized controlled studies in patients with anticipated difficult intubation undergoing ear nose and throat (ENT) or oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgery are lacking, it is still unknown if hyperangulated blades improve glottic view and if their use translates into faster intubation. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) between hyperangulated blades and Macintosh blades in patients with expected difficult intubation undergoing ENT or OMF surgery who require transoral tracheal intubation. Secondary aims are to compare secondary outcome measures such as time variables, indicators for difficult and successful intubation, number of attempts, view conditions, difficult airway classifications and adverse events between both blade types.