View clinical trials related to Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.
Filter by:The aim of the present study is to find out whether fusion of multilevel SPECT/CT positive lumbar degeneration leads to a significant improvement of pain and disability.
The aim of the present study is to find out whether fusion of a sinlge level SPECT/CT positive degenerative disc disease leads to a significant improvement of pain and disability.
Intervertebral disc pathology accounts for 40% or more cases of chronic LBP. Available treatment options do not improve the underlying degenerative condition hence This indicates the need for new therapies. intradiscal injection of PRP with exosomes derived from blood may potentially transmit some of the unique stem cell properties to other stem cells, facilitating stemness maintenance, differentiation, self-renewal, and repair. controlled, randomized, double-blind placebo clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of PRP with exosomes in discogenic LBP adminstartion of PRP with exosomes at the centre of the nucleus pulposus or equal amount of placebo paradiscal patients wil be elvaluated for primary Outcome measures viz: Visual analog scale (VAS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), SF 36 health questionnaire, Functional rating index and Secondary: MRI - disc degeneration grading, T2 quantification, and for any Adverse events including of discitis
This is a post-market clinical follow-up study that use questionnaires such as Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), or the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to compare the clinical improvement effects before and after surgery.
The purpose of this study is to systematically, prospectively compare surgical fusion techniques for thoracolumbar spinal fusion patients and assess long-term patient outcomes and revision rates following surgery.
Autologous Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) represents a regenerative therapy that has gained remarkable ground in the field of orthopaedics in recent years. PRP has been implemented for a plethora of musculoskeletal ailments, being associated with minor complications and noteworthy efficacy (Akeda et al., 2019). PRP has been depicted to contain a variety of growth factors crucial for regulation of cell proliferation and migration as well as extracellular matrix synthesis (Cheng et al., 2019). Furthermore, therapeutic effect of PRP administration is considered to be additionally exerted via its anti-inflammatory and immunoregulative properties, as it has been delineated to induce regional decrease of pro-inflammatory mediators at the injection site (Hirase et al., 2020). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and Facet Joint Syndrome (FJS) constitute chronic degenerative conditions of lumbar spine that have been associated with substantial morbidity and disability in recent years. Besides the noted progress in comprehension of these conditions' pathogenesis, available therapeutic modalities remain extremely limited and controversial, being not capable of altering the natural progress of underlying disease (Wu et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Hirase et al., 2020). Autologous PRR has been recommended as a beneficial alternative instead of conventional treatment strategies for interventional management of lumbar DDD and FJS (Aufiero et al., 2015; Navani and Hames, 2015; Kirchner and Anitua, 2016; Levi et al., 2016; Tuakli-Wosornu et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; Akeda et al., 2017; Lutz GE, 2017; Wu et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2019). Results of these studies indicated that intra-discal and intra-articular injection of PRP for DDD and FJS respectively is characterized by safety and satisfactory efficacy in reducing intensity of clinical manifestations, exerting also potentially regenerative effects. However, quality of available evidence is remarkably low, since in the overwhelming majority of these studies was a limited number of patients evaluated. Furthermore, determined follow-up intervals were not extended and, most importantly, patients were not majorly with rigorous clinical and radiologic criteria selected. Aim of this study is to investigate the precise effects of intradiscal and intra-articular injection of PRP in patients with early-stage lumbar DDD and FJS, as determined by particular radiologic classifications. The prospective design, the defined greater number of recruited individuals in pilot analysis as well as the comparatively greater follow-up underline the originality of our protocol.
The primary objective of this study is to measure the success rate of lumbar fusion in subjects at 12 months when instrumented lumbar arthrodesis is performed using OssiMend Bioactive Moldable as the bone grafting material
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of occipito-cervico-thoracic spine surgery using posterior fixation as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and patients reported outcomes (PROs).This study is being undertaken to identify possible residual risks and to clarify mid-to long-term clinical performance that may affect the benefit/risk ratio of posterior fixation systems.
ACTIVE is a phase II B efficacy monocenter, prospective, randomized, controlled double blinded trial, in which intra-discal autologous adult BM-MSC therapy will be compared with sham treated controls. This trial will evaluate the efficacy of intradiscal injection of autologous BM-MSCs in workers affected by chronic low back pain (LBP) unresponsive to conventional therapy. The efficacy will be evaluated 12 months after the treatment in terms of pain relief (VAS, Visual Analog Scale), functionality (ODI, Oswestry Disability Index), quality of life (SF36, Short Form - 36) and work ability index (WAI).
The objective of this study is to determine if one single X-ray-guided intradiscal injection of 8 mg/mL of HYALODISC combined with PEP will be more effective than only physical exercise program in patients with LBP from degenerative disc disease. Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups below: - Group 1: One single X-ray-guided intradiscal injection (25 gauge) of 8 mg/mL of HYALODISC combined with PEP. The investigator will use one syringe for each involved disc, up to a maximum of three discs. - Group 2: PEP alone. The injection will be administered at V1 baseline (day 0). Any physical activity (e.g. jogging, tennis, weightlifting, prolonged upright position) in the 48 hours following the injection should be avoided. Both groups (Group 1 and Group 2) will be treated with PEP according to a standardized protocol. Starting one week after the baseline visit (V1), patients will be prescribed of 18 physiotherapy sessions that will take place under supervision of physiotherapist twice a week in the first seven weeks (weeks 2-8) and once a week in the next four weeks (weeks 9-12). Twelve repetitions of each exercise for 3 sets will be performed during PEP session. Moreover, in addition to the 18 sessions performed with supervision of the physiotherapist, all patients will be instructed how to do exercises at home and will be asked to continue these exercises once a week in the first seven weeks (weeks 2-8) and twice a week in the next four weeks (weeks 9-12).