Intensive Care Unit Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of a Context-adapted Decision Aid Supporting Critically Ill Patients' Decisions About Life-sustaining Therapies - a Pilot Project
Verified date | July 2019 |
Source | Laval University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Introduction: Clinical practice guidelines recommend shared decision making (SDM) to
facilitate goals-of-care discussions. This study will train clinicians about how to use a
context-adapted decision aid (DA) and SDM to conduct goals-of-care discussions with the
elderly. The objectives of this study are to: 1) determine if the use of the DA and SDM
training program: a) increase clinicians' engagement of patients in decision making regarding
their goals of care; b) increase adoption of evidence-based behaviours regarding
goals-of-care decision making; and 2) identify patients' most frequent incomprehension,
concerns, questions and clinicians' opportunities to improve the skills in goals-of-care
decision making.
Methods: This study will have three phases. Phase I (May-June 2017) will be a baseline
evaluation of the current goals-of-care decision making process with elderly patients in a
single ICU setting (Levis, Quebec). Phase II (July-August 2017) will be an evaluation of the
goals-of-care decision making process in the same ICU using a DA. Phase III
(September-December 2017) will be the delivery of an online and in-person training session
about the use of the DA and about how to conduct discussions about goals-of-care. The study
will then evaluate the goals-of-care decision making process after completion of the training
program and using the DA. The investigators will observe and audio- or video-record all
eligible elderly-intensivist dyads discussing goals of care during each phase. Two
investigators will analyse the recordings using the OPTION 12 scale (measuring the extent
that clinicians engage patients in SDM) and the ACCEPT quality indicators (measuring the
extent to which intensivists engage in best practice goals-of-care discussions). The
investigators will conduct qualitative content analysis of the video and audio records to
identify patients' most frequent incomprehension, concerns, questions and clinicians'
opportunities to improve the goals-of-care decision-making skills.
Deliverables: This study will produce evidence regarding the impact of a context-adapted DA
and training program on clinicians' adoption of SDM and other best practice behaviors
regarding goals-of-care decision making with the elderly, and evidence regarding the most
frequent patients' incomprehension, concerns, questions and clinicians' opportunities to
improve the goals-of-care decision-making skills.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 26 |
Est. completion date | January 22, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | January 22, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 65 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. aged 65 and older, 2. capable of making their own healthcare decisions as determined by the attending intensivist's clinical judgment, 3. in need of a discussion about goals of care as determined by the attending intensivist's clinical judgment. Exclusion Criteria: 1. intubated patients, 2. patients facing urgent decisions, 3. patients cared by the principal investigator, 4. patients who do not read or speak French. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Centre de recherche de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis | Lévis | Quebec |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Laval University | Canadian Frailty Network |
Canada,
Evans R, Edwards A, Brett J, Bradburn M, Watson E, Austoker J, Elwyn G. Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jul;58(1):13-26. Review. — View Citation
Heyland D, Cook D, Bagshaw SM, Garland A, Stelfox HT, Mehta S, Dodek P, Kutsogiannis J, Burns K, Muscedere J, Turgeon AF, Fowler R, Jiang X, Day AG; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network. The Very Elderly Admitted to ICU: A Quality Finish? Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1352-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001024. — View Citation
Heyland DK, Barwich D, Pichora D, Dodek P, Lamontagne F, You JJ, Tayler C, Porterfield P, Sinuff T, Simon J; ACCEPT (Advance Care Planning Evaluation in Elderly Patients) Study Team; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):778-87. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180. — View Citation
Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB; American College of Critical Care Medicine; American Thoracic Society. Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):188-201. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396. — View Citation
Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner-Banzhoff N. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7:CD006732. — View Citation
Sinuff T, Dodek P, You JJ, Barwich D, Tayler C, Downar J, Hartwick M, Frank C, Stelfox HT, Heyland DK. Improving End-of-Life Communication and Decision Making: The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Quality Indicators. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1070-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 24. — View Citation
White DB, Braddock CH 3rd, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):461-7. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION) scale | The OPTION scale (12 items) measures the extent that clinicians engage patients in shared decision making. For each item, a score 0 (The behaviour is not observed) to 4 (The behaviour is observed and executed to a high standard) is given. Adding each item's score will arrive at a number between 0 (minimum) and 48 (maximum). The OPTION scale will be measured by two observers rating audio- or video-recordings of goals-of-care discussions conducted by intensivists with their patients at the earliest possible time during the patients intensive care stay. These discussions will be held at the discretion of the attending intensivist when deemed appropriate. Most often these discussions are held at the time of patient admission (first 24 hours) or whenever the patient is capable of engaging in a goals of care discussion (eg., after the patient is extubated and weaned off mechanical ventilation). | The OPTION scale will be measured at the earliest possible time during the patients' intensive care stay (eg., first 24 hours after admission or whenever the patient is capable of engaging in a goals-of-care discussion). | |
Primary | Score based on the quality indicators from the Audit of Communication, Care Planning, and Documentation (ACCEPT) study | This measure will be based on 7 of the 34 (ACCEPT) quality indicators that measure the quality of end-of-life communication and decision making: written information provided before discussion about goals of care, poor prognosis shared with patient during the discussion, verification with patient about prior discussions or written documents about the use of life-sustaining treatments, use of information by intensivist about about goals of care to support the decision, verification by the intensivist prior to the discussion of any written advanced directives in the patient's medical record, documentation of the goals of care discussed in medical record after discussion, goals of care documented in the medical chart after discussion consistent with patient's stated preferences. Indicators will be measured by two observers rating audio- or video-recordings. Score is the sum of the quality indicator items divided by the sum of highest possible values of these items on a scale 0% to 100%. | The quality indicators will be measured at the earliest possible time during the patients' intensive care stay (eg., first 24 hours after admission or whenever the patient is capable of engaging in a goals-of-care discussion. | |
Secondary | Qualitative content analysis | Each audio or video recording will be content analysed by a doctoral student and a research assistant using the R language Qualitative Data Analysis (RQDA) package for Qualitative Data Analysis. The aim of this content analysis will be to identify: 1) patients' most frequent incomprehension, concerns, questions and 2) clinicians' opportunities to improve their skills in goals-of-care discussions and decision making. | The audio and video recordings will be done at the earliest possible time during the patients' intensive care stay (eg., first 24 hours after admission or whenever the patient is capable of engaging in a goals-of-care discussion. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04361032 -
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab Compared to DefeROxamine, Associated With Standards Treatments in COVID-19 (+) Patients Hospitalized In Intensive Care in Tunisia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03520023 -
Critical Care and Palliative Care Medicine Together in the ICU
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01169571 -
Study to Evaluate Hemodynamic Effect of Different Loading Doses of Precedex in Post-surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01168128 -
PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian Nutrition Guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy: The PERFECTIS Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05029167 -
REstrictive Versus LIberal Oxygen Strategy and Its Effect on Pulmonary Hypertension After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (RELIEPH-study)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06176807 -
Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Sepsis Using Venous Excess Ultrasound Score
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05367011 -
Therapeutic Monitoring of Antibiotics in Intensive Care Patients: a Cohort Study PopTDM-ICU
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05056090 -
Effect of Prone Positioning on Mortality in Patients With Mild to Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04503135 -
Catheter Associated Asymptomatic Thrombosis in Intensive Care Unit
|
||
Completed |
NCT03983044 -
Comparison of Two Methods for Assessing Cough Capacity in Intensive Care Unit After Cardiac Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT05573659 -
Capillary Refill Time Calculated With a Video-assisted Method Has a Better Reproducibility Than Visual Method in Critically Ill Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06032169 -
Ankle Measurements of Arterial Pressure: Semi-recumbent or Horizontal Position.
|
||
Completed |
NCT04199273 -
Assessment of Human Diaphragm Strength by Magnetic and Electric Stimulation After Ultrasonography Phrenic Nerve Tracking
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04353804 -
Returning to Everyday Tasks Utilizing Rehabilitation Networks-III (RETURN-III)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03681626 -
Does Tracheal Suction During Extubation in Intensive Care Unit Decrease Functional Residual Capacity
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04094428 -
Burden, Mortality and Supply Costs in Intensive Care Unit Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04014920 -
Non-invasive Ventilation Following Extubation (Prophylactic) to Prevent Extubation Failure in Critically Obese Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05131633 -
Regional Anaesthesia in Intensive Care Unit
|
||
Completed |
NCT06239987 -
The Effect of Care-oriented Practical Training on Nurses' Intensive and Critical Care Competency and HAIs Indicators
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06121024 -
Long-term Outcomes of Post-intubation Tracheal Stenosis; 7-year Follow-up
|