Influenza Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Post-exposure Oseltamivir Prophylaxis on Influenza Transmission in Nursing Homes
The incidence of severe morbidity and mortality following an influenza infection during the annual influenza epidemics is highest among the elderly population and 90% of influenzaassociated mortality occurs in this group. Vaccination is considered the best preventive intervention available but offers only partial protection. The protective effect decreases with advancing age and existing co-morbidity. Therefore, in spite of high compliance with vaccination, the risk of influenza-related complications among nursing-home residents, is particularly high, and consequently also the associated disease and economic burden. There is debate on the potential health benefit of the antiviral activity of oseltamivir as an effective supplementary intervention to prevent or contain influenza outbreaks in nursing homes. Although effectiveness of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with oseltamivir on preventing transmission has been demonstrated in trials among healthy (mainly unvaccinated) adults and children, effectiveness has not yet been assessed among vulnerable vaccinated highrisk groups, such as the elderly population in nursing homes. If proven (cost)effective, oseltamivir could have considerable benefits in this setting, although constraints relating to implementation need to be addressed as well.
Objective If proven (cost)effective, without inducing antiviral resistance, oseltamivir
could have considerable benefits in this setting, although constraints relating to
implementation need to be addressed as well. If not (cost)effective if this fragile
population, resources can be better spent on other activities to support nursing home
residents.
Study design:
A randomised controlled trial on the effect of PEP with oseltamivir versus placebo on
transmission of influenza in nursing homes, linked to virological monitoring of possible
development of resistance and impact on transmission and outcome, linked with a cost
effectiveness analysis, and an exploration of logistical and ethical issues which could
interfere with successful implementation.
Study population:
This trial will be nested in the recently established Network of Nursing Homes (SNIV). SNIV
has been initiated and is coordinated by the RIVM Centre of Infectious Disease Control.
Baseline data on the population in these nursing homes is already routinely collected, and
epidemiological and virological surveillance of ILI/influenza is established, in
collaboration with the local laboratories.
Intervention:
Post-exposition prophylaxis with oseltamivir or placebo. Once laboratory confirmation has
been obtained in an index case, all residents of that implicated unit only will be randomly
assigned to PEP with either oseltamivir 75 mg or placebo once daily for 10 days. Data on
co-morbidity, medication and other potential confounders for susceptibility to a clinical
influenza infection will be collected prior to the start of PEP. The index patient (and any
secondary patients) will be treated therapeutically with oseltamivir. Main study
parameters/endpoints: Transmission, the primary trial outcome measurement, is defined as a
newly laboratory confirmed influenza in the same unit 12 hours or more after the start of
PEP. Assuming 30 homes participate, that annually 30% of nursinghomes experience a confirmed
influenza outbreak in on average two units, than we can recruit 20 units per season.
Assuming that without effective prophylaxis ongoing transmission occurs in 40% of the units,
we will have at least 80% power after 3 seasons with a two-sided alpha=0.05 to demonstrate a
reduction in transmission of 70%.
Furthermore, this trial offers an excellent opportunity to evaluate the possible emergence
of resistance against oseltamivir if used under such circumstances, by analysing the
occurrence of viral mutations under oseltamivir therapy (for index- and for any secondary
cases). In addition, we will assess the relative cost-effectiveness of PEP with oseltamivir
per nursing home unit, compared to not using PEP by prospectively collecting information on
the number of influenza infections and related complications, duration of symptoms, use of
medical services by secondary cases, as well as sickness leave of staff.
Finally, potential ethical and logistical restrictions for the large scale use of
oseltamivir will be documented prospectively.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group
relatedness:
Burden and risks of this trial will be minimal, as we will not deviate from current standing
practices, in which some nursing homes offer PEP and others don't, following the diagnosis
of influenza on a unit.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05523089 -
The Effectiveness of CD388 to Prevent Flu in an Influenza Challenge Model in Healthy Adults
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05009251 -
Using Explainable AI Risk Predictions to Nudge Influenza Vaccine Uptake
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03282240 -
Safety and Immunogenicity of High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Participants ≥65 Years in the US
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00968526 -
Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Safety of an Investigational Influenza Vaccine (H1N1) in Adults
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00971425 -
Evaluation of the Immune Response and the Safety of a Pandemic Influenza Candidate Vaccine (H1N1)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00968539 -
Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity & Safety of an Investigational Influenza Vaccine (H1N1) in Adults
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05525494 -
Patient Portal Flu Vaccine Reminders (5)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04074928 -
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of QIVc in Healthy Pediatric Subjects
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04695717 -
This Study Was Conducted to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of IVACFLU-S Produced in Children From 6 Months to Under 18 Years Old and the Elderly Over 60 Years Old in Vietnam
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05012163 -
Lottery Incentive Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccinations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03888989 -
Response to Influenza Vaccine During Pregnancy
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04109222 -
Collection of Serum Samples From Children and Older Adults Receiving the 2019-2020 Formulations of Fluzone® Quadrivalent and Fluzone® High-Dose Influenza Vaccines, Respectively
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02587221 -
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of an MF59-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Non-influenza Vaccine Comparator in Adults ≥ 65 Years of Age
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03453801 -
The Role of CD4+ Memory Phenotype, Memory, and Effector T Cells in Vaccination and Infection
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01440387 -
A Study of Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Influenza Vaccine FLU-Q-QIV in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01195779 -
Trial to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' Influenza Vaccine GSK2584786A in Healthy Children
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03321968 -
Lot-to-lot Consistency of a Plant-Derived Quadrivalent Virus-Like Particles Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00972517 -
Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of an Investigational Influenza Vaccine (H1N1) in Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04570904 -
Broadening Our Understanding of Early Versus Late Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03331991 -
Prevention of Influenza and Other Wintertime Respiratory Viruses Among Healthcare Professionals in Israel
|
N/A |