View clinical trials related to Influenza.
Filter by:Background: Respiratory viruses, like the flu or COVID-19, cause significant illness and death worldwide. Researchers want to collect samples from people with respiratory virus infections. The samples in this natural history study will be used in future research. Objective: To obtain samples from people with respiratory viruses to learn more about respiratory virus infections and the immune responses against them. Eligibility: People aged 3 and older who have or are suspected to have a respiratory virus infection. Design: Participants will be screened with a medical record review. Participants will give blood samples. Data from their medical records will be collected. Participants will give nose samples. A soft plastic strip will be put into each nostril for a minute. They may also give nose, mouth (back of the throat), or saliva samples using swabs. Participants may receive kits by mail to collect nose and blood samples at home. They will use soft plastic strips to collect nose samples. To collect blood, they will prick their finger and dab a few drops of blood on four plastic tips. If a participant is in the hospital, air samples may be collected in their room. Participation will last for up to 2 years. After 2 years, participants may be asked for their consent again to give new samples and new medical data.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity profile of CVSQIV at different dose levels.
This study evaluates the association between gut microbiome and dietary determinants and vaccine response. This study aims to learn if diet and the microbes (such as bacteria and viruses) found in your gut affect the body's immune response to the influenza vaccine.
Lung allograft recipients have a higher burden of influenza disease and greater associated morbidity and mortality compared with healthy controls. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression is thought to impair immunogenicity to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine. This early post-transplant period is when immunity is most desirable, since influenza disease during this time frame is associated with adverse consequences. Thus, strategies to reduce severe influenza disease in this highly susceptible population are critical. No trials in lung transplant recipients have evaluated two doses of HD-IIV within the same influenza season as a strategy to improve immunogenicity and durability of influenza prevention. Furthermore, no influenza vaccine trials have focused on enrollment of subjects at early post-transplant timepoints. Very few studies have been performed in solely lung allograft recipients. Immunosuppression intensity is highest in lung patients, thereby limiting comparisons to recipients of heart, liver, and kidney transplants. Therefore, studies to assess both HD-IIV and two-dose strategies in the same influenza season in post-lung transplant recipients are greatly needed. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that lung allograft recipients who are 1-35 months post-transplant and receiving two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have higher HAI geometric mean titers (GMT) to influenza antigens compared to those receiving two doses of SD-QIV. To test this hypothesis and address the above critical knowledge gaps, we propose to conduct a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing the administration of two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant. The results of this clinical trial will address significant knowledge gaps regarding influenza vaccine strategies (e.g., one vs. two doses and HD-QIV vs. SD-QIV) and immune responses in lung transplant recipients and will guide vaccine recommendations during the post-transplant period.
In this single-center, randomized, blinded, positive-controlled design, the investigators will assess the safety and immunogenicity of 2 doses of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months. About 120 healthy participants are planned to be enrolled, of who 60 participants were enrolled in the low-dose group and 60 participants were enrolled in the high-dose group. In the low-dose group, participants were randomly (2:1:1) assigned to receive a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata, and a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B/Victoria, and IIV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Yamagata. In the high-dose group, participants were randomly (2:1:1) assigned to receive IIV4 at 0.5 mL, and IIV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria, and IV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Yamagata. Subjects receive 2 doses of influenza vaccine 4 weeks apart. The occurrence of adverse reactions within 30 minutes, the occurrence of adverse reactions within 28 days, and serious adverse events within 6 months after vaccination will be observed in all participants. For participants aged 24-35 months in each dose group, laboratory safety tests were measured before enrollment and on day 4 post each dose to assess any toxic effects. In addition, all subjects will be required to collect blood for HI antibody testing before the first dose of vaccination and 30 days after the second dose of vaccination.
The complexities of the immune system make measuring the impact of dietary interventions upon its function challenging. The immune system is highly responsive to environmental influences, including the diet. An individual's diet provides the energy required to mount a strong and protective immune response, the building blocks required for synthesis of immune mediators such as antibodies and cytokines, and can also indirectly affect immune function via changes in the gut microbiome. Immune function varies across the lifecourse, with a well understood decline in immune function with age, resulting in impaired vaccination responses and an increased risk of infections and of severe complications and mortality arising from common communicable diseases such as influenza. This impaired immunity with ageing is known as immunosenescence and this affects both innate and acquired arms of the immune system.
This Prospective epidemiological cohort study is being conducted in order to generate epidemiological data in support of Osivax's clinical development of a broad spectrum influenza vaccine based upon the internal influenza nucleoprotein (NP) as a target for immune response.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the efficacy and safety of baloxavir in combination with oseltamivir (standard of care) for the treatment of influenza in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. Although there are no data about this treatment option currently available, the investigator hypothesizes that combination therapy may be more effective in clearing influenza virus infection and decreasing the rate of emergence of resistant influenza in immunocompromised human hosts.
The study the safety, reactogenicity and obtain preliminary data on the immunogenicity of Flu-M Quadro, 4-valent inactivated split influenza vaccine, in healthy volunteers
Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For those aged 6 months through 8 years who have previously received ≥2 total doses of trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine ≥4 weeks apart, they require only 1 dose of influenza vaccine. For those who have not previously received ≥2 doses of trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine, they require 2 dose of influenza vaccine. but the evidence on how to select vaccine doses for quadrivalent influenza vaccine is limited in China. The study is a prospective, open-label comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 1 versus 2 doses of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in subjects of 3-8 years old with different history of influenza vaccination.