View clinical trials related to Influenza.
Filter by:This study will compare the immune response signatures (including immunologic, transcriptomic and metabolomic) of the two influenza vaccines approved for use in adults age 65 and over (Fluad and Fluzone High-Dose).
Viral respiratory tract infections (VRTI) are among the most common human illnesses, impacting billions globally. There is an unmet need to identify novel ways to detect, treat and prevent their spread. New wearable devices could address this need, using special biosensors worn by patients. This is a single centre, controlled, before and after, longitudinal, clinical trial. Participants will receive FluMist, a live attenuated influenza vaccine, which will act as a proxy to a viral respiratory tract infection and create a very minor response to the immune system. Vital signs and activity levels will be monitored continuously using wearable biosensors for 7 days prior to and 7 days following, along with symptom tracking and blood tests to measure immune responses. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms will be used to analyse the data. AI and ML will identify subtle changes in vital signs and activity levels from the immune response to respiratory viruses. These data will help develop future methods to address important public health questions related to respiratory virus detection, containment and management. The purpose of this study is to explore whether wearable sensors can detect, track the progress and recovery from viral respiratory tract infection.
The present study will evaluate the concomitant administration of a Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine with the highest dose level of OVX836 (480µg) tested in the clinic to date, for which the likelihood for interference with Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine is considered the highest.
The study aims to characterize the community burden (including the clinical features) and transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 within the context of a functional antibody response. In addition,the study will assess the effect of the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with influenza virus and RSV on disease severity and transmission dynamics. A household-level prospective cohort study will be conducted in one rural and one urban community located in Mpumalanga Province and North West Province, respectively. The study will be conducted for 12 months of intensive follow up (July 2020 to August 2021) with a post-intensive follow-up continuing for a further 16 months (until December 2022). Two hundred households; 1,000 study participants of all ages; will be randomly selected from a list of 327 hoseholds that participated and successfully completed a 10-months follow-up period in a study similar to that currently proposed, but directed at community burden and transmission dynamics of influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory pathogens. Each household and household member will be enumerated and the HIV infection status and the level of immunosuppression of HIV-infected individuals will be assessed. Each household member will be followed twice per week during the intense follow-up period (12 months) of the study. During this period upper respiratory tract samples will be collected irrespective of presence of symptoms and data on key symptoms, healthcare seeking, hospitalization and death will be captured at each follow up visit. Respiratory samples will be tested by reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV, and selected samples will be cultured and sequenced. An infection risk questionnaire will be administered to all study participants at enrollment and every month thereafter. Sera will be collected at enrollment and every 2 months during the 12-month intense follow-up period from all participants. In addition, sera will be collected every 2 months for a further 6 months following the 12-month intense follow-up period from study participants that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR on respiratory specimens at 14, 16 and 18 months and from all study participants at 18 months. Sera will be tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV antibodies. Wearable proximity sensors will be deployed for 8-12 days in each household over the 6-month intense follow-up period.
Background: Respiratory viruses, like the flu or COVID-19, cause significant illness and death worldwide. Researchers want to collect samples from people with respiratory virus infections. The samples in this natural history study will be used in future research. Objective: To obtain samples from people with respiratory viruses to learn more about respiratory virus infections and the immune responses against them. Eligibility: People aged 3 and older who have or are suspected to have a respiratory virus infection. Design: Participants will be screened with a medical record review. Participants will give blood samples. Data from their medical records will be collected. Participants will give nose samples. A soft plastic strip will be put into each nostril for a minute. They may also give nose, mouth (back of the throat), or saliva samples using swabs. Participants may receive kits by mail to collect nose and blood samples at home. They will use soft plastic strips to collect nose samples. To collect blood, they will prick their finger and dab a few drops of blood on four plastic tips. If a participant is in the hospital, air samples may be collected in their room. Participation will last for up to 2 years. After 2 years, participants may be asked for their consent again to give new samples and new medical data.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity profile of CVSQIV at different dose levels.
This study evaluates the association between gut microbiome and dietary determinants and vaccine response. This study aims to learn if diet and the microbes (such as bacteria and viruses) found in your gut affect the body's immune response to the influenza vaccine.
Lung allograft recipients have a higher burden of influenza disease and greater associated morbidity and mortality compared with healthy controls. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression is thought to impair immunogenicity to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine. This early post-transplant period is when immunity is most desirable, since influenza disease during this time frame is associated with adverse consequences. Thus, strategies to reduce severe influenza disease in this highly susceptible population are critical. No trials in lung transplant recipients have evaluated two doses of HD-IIV within the same influenza season as a strategy to improve immunogenicity and durability of influenza prevention. Furthermore, no influenza vaccine trials have focused on enrollment of subjects at early post-transplant timepoints. Very few studies have been performed in solely lung allograft recipients. Immunosuppression intensity is highest in lung patients, thereby limiting comparisons to recipients of heart, liver, and kidney transplants. Therefore, studies to assess both HD-IIV and two-dose strategies in the same influenza season in post-lung transplant recipients are greatly needed. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that lung allograft recipients who are 1-35 months post-transplant and receiving two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have higher HAI geometric mean titers (GMT) to influenza antigens compared to those receiving two doses of SD-QIV. To test this hypothesis and address the above critical knowledge gaps, we propose to conduct a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing the administration of two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant. The results of this clinical trial will address significant knowledge gaps regarding influenza vaccine strategies (e.g., one vs. two doses and HD-QIV vs. SD-QIV) and immune responses in lung transplant recipients and will guide vaccine recommendations during the post-transplant period.
In this single-center, randomized, blinded, positive-controlled design, the investigators will assess the safety and immunogenicity of 2 doses of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months. About 120 healthy participants are planned to be enrolled, of who 60 participants were enrolled in the low-dose group and 60 participants were enrolled in the high-dose group. In the low-dose group, participants were randomly (2:1:1) assigned to receive a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata, and a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B/Victoria, and IIV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Yamagata. In the high-dose group, participants were randomly (2:1:1) assigned to receive IIV4 at 0.5 mL, and IIV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria, and IV3 at 0.25 mL including A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Yamagata. Subjects receive 2 doses of influenza vaccine 4 weeks apart. The occurrence of adverse reactions within 30 minutes, the occurrence of adverse reactions within 28 days, and serious adverse events within 6 months after vaccination will be observed in all participants. For participants aged 24-35 months in each dose group, laboratory safety tests were measured before enrollment and on day 4 post each dose to assess any toxic effects. In addition, all subjects will be required to collect blood for HI antibody testing before the first dose of vaccination and 30 days after the second dose of vaccination.
The complexities of the immune system make measuring the impact of dietary interventions upon its function challenging. The immune system is highly responsive to environmental influences, including the diet. An individual's diet provides the energy required to mount a strong and protective immune response, the building blocks required for synthesis of immune mediators such as antibodies and cytokines, and can also indirectly affect immune function via changes in the gut microbiome. Immune function varies across the lifecourse, with a well understood decline in immune function with age, resulting in impaired vaccination responses and an increased risk of infections and of severe complications and mortality arising from common communicable diseases such as influenza. This impaired immunity with ageing is known as immunosenescence and this affects both innate and acquired arms of the immune system.