Infertility Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation, and Luteal Estradiol Priming Protocol for Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve - The LUTEAL Trial
NCT number | NCT04447872 |
Other study ID # | 20-0080 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | September 15, 2020 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Ovarian reserve defines the quantity and quality of the ovarian primordial follicular pool. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) indicates a reduction in the quantity of ovarian follicular pool to less than expected for age. It is an important cause of infertility in many couples. To date, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the definition of diminished ovarian reserve, and it is unclear whether low oocyte yield results from an abnormal atresia rate of the follicle pool, or from a lower follicle pool at birth or whether it can just occur as a normal variation in the population. The ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (for example, for in vitro fertilization) is largely determined by the ovarian reserve, and there are numerous different ovarian stimulation protocols that are employed to try and increase the oocyte yield of a particular cycle. There is no consensus on which, if any, of these protocols are superior and preferred for patient with DOR. Luteal gonadotropin stimulation is a protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for use in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that has emerged over the past decade as an acceptable alternative to the classic follicular gonadotropin stimulation. The luteal estradiol patch protocol was introduced in 2005 in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and to address the phenomenon of early follicle recruitment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Luteal gonadotropin stimulation can potentially achieve the same effect by initiating follicular recruitment for IVF prior to the body's own premature recruitment. Our hypothesis is that the luteal stimulation protocol and estradiol priming protocol are equivalent with regard to the outcome of number of mature oocytes retrieved. Patients who will be undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and who have a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve will be considered for this trial, and enrolled if meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 142 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 20 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Female aged 20 - 45 4. Regular menstrual cycles between 21 and 40 days 5. Presence of both ovaries 6. Meets criteria for DOR by the recent ASRM/ACOG Committee Opinion 1. antimüllerian hormone (AMH) value less than 1 ng/mL 2. antral follicle count less than 5-7 and 3. follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) greater than 10 IU/L or 4. a history of poor response to in vitro fertilization stimulation (fewer than four oocytes at time of egg retrieval). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Oocyte donation cycle 2. Oocyte freezing cycle 3. Current ovarian cyst > 3cm 4. Anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory (<6 ovulation per year) 5. Previous oophorectomy 6. Exposure to cytotoxic or pelvic irradiation 7. Planned aromatase inhibitor usage during current ovarian stimulation 8. Sensitizing or ovarian stimulating therapy in the past one month Additional contraindications to this study re, as follows (because such patients cannot receive an estrogen patch): 9. Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding 10. Known, suspected, or history of breast cancer 11. Known or suspected estrogen-dependent neoplasia 12. Active DVT, PE, or a history of these conditions 13. Active arterial thromboembolic disease (for example, stroke and MI), or a history of these conditions 14. Known anaphylactic reaction or angioedema with estradiol patches 15. Known liver impairment or disease 16. Known protein C, protein S, or antithrombin deficiency, or other known thrombophilic disorders |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Northwell Fertility | Manhasset | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Northwell Health |
United States,
Lin LT, Vitale SG, Chen SN, Wen ZH, Tsai HW, Chern CU, Tsui KH. Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study. Adv Ther. 2018 Jun;35(6):847-856. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0713-1. Epub 2018 Jun 4. — View Citation
Wei LH, Ma WH, Tang N, Wei JH. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;55(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.07.001. — View Citation
Wu Y, Zhao FC, Sun Y, Liu PS. Luteal-phase protocol in poor ovarian response: a comparative study with an antagonist protocol. J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):1731-1738. doi: 10.1177/0300060516669898. Epub 2017 Jan 16. — View Citation
Zhang W, Wang M, Wang S, Bao H, Qu Q, Zhang N, Hao C. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;22(3):193-198. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180045. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Embryo ploidy status | If patient undergoes preimplantation for genetic testing of aneuploidy (PGT-A), we will compare the rate of euploid embryos between the groups | When biopsy results return, usually within four weeks after oocyte retrieval | |
Other | Implantation rate | Rate of successful embryo implantation if undergoes embryo transfer | Two weeks post embryo transfer | |
Other | Clinical pregnancy rate | Rate of successful clinical intrauterine pregnancy if undergoes embryo transfer | Five to seven weeks post embryo transfer | |
Other | Live birth rate | Rate of live birth if undergoes embryo transfer | 40 weeks post embryo transfer | |
Primary | Number of mature (Metaphase II) oocytes retrieved | Mature oocytes, capable of being fertilized in vitro | First day after oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Number of oocytes cumulus complexes retrieved | Total oocytes from oocyte retrieval | First day after oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Oocyte fertilization rate | Rate of oocytes that develop two pronuclei | First day after oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Blastocyst development rate | Rate of embryos that develop to the blastocyst stage | Day 5-7 following oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Cycle cancellation rate | Rate of cycle cancellation prior to oocyte retrieval | Within two weeks of cycle start | |
Secondary | Total FSH dosage (IU) used | Total dosage of injected gonadotropins during ovarian stimulation | From the first day of injections, through the day of oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Duration of stimulation (days) | How many days from first injection until trigger shot injection | From the first day of injections, through the day of oocyte retrieval |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03607409 -
Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02312076 -
GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02161861 -
Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03287479 -
Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03522350 -
Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04496284 -
Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03623659 -
pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03895099 -
New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04142112 -
Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03152643 -
Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03683771 -
Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03161119 -
Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04108039 -
Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678597 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678610 -
Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678818 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678558 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678571 -
Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03677492 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03678584 -
Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA)
|
N/A |