Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05161338 |
Other study ID # |
2110-VLC-095-EL |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 15, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
April 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Is already demonstrated that around 30% of patients undergoing an artificial cycle with
vaginal progesterone do not reach a minimum threshold value of serum progesterone levels on
the day of embryo transfer. Women with serum progesterone levels below this threshold have
20% lower ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates, decreasing their chances of success.
However, the cause of this high heterogeneity in exogenous vaginal progesterone absorption
among our patients remains unknown. It has been suggested that vaginal microbiome, and
vaginal pH (due to its impact in microbiota growth), may explain the differences in vaginal
progesterone absorption. The aim of the present pilot study is to assess if certain vaginal
conditions, such as its microbiome status or its pH level, might affect vaginal progesterone
absorption (measured by serum progesterone levels) and, in turn, the chances of success. In
order to evaluate it, a prospective cohort unicentric study will be conducted in IVI RMA
Valencia (Spain). Infertile patients undergoing an embryo transfer in the context of an
artificial cycle when using vaginal progesterone will be recruited. Serum progesterone and
estradiol levels, microbiome genetic analysis in vaginal samples and vaginal pH will be
measured both on the embryo transfer-scheduling day and on the embryo transfer day.
Description:
Currently, as part of routine clinical practice serum progesterone levels were meassured of
women undergoing an ET in the context of an artificial cycle. These blood tests are usually
performed around 2 hours before ET, thus results are available before their departure of the
clinic. In the event of detecting low serum progesterone levels, an extra dose of exogenous
subcutaneous progesterone is given for LPS.
There is not knowing about the reason of this heterogeneity in progesterone absorption, and
one plausible hypothesis is vaginal microbiome. In the event of proving a significant
association between vaginal microbiome and serum progesterone levels on the day of ET, and in
particular if these levels are below or above the delimited threshold, it would be possible
to individualize LPS in several patients in a more direct manner.
It is true that our current clinical practice, giving subcutaneous progesterone, is capable
of equaling OPR of women with serum progesterone levels below 8.8 ng/ml on the ET day to
those with values above this threshold applying the exact same approach to all patients. This
study could be the next step towards an iLPS, to know the reason of the lower progesterone
levels, and treat it directly, instead of moving to the need of a daily injection of
progesterone which is costly and not patient friendly. Furthermore, vaginal microbiome may
also have an impact in the subsequent OPR, even though serum progesterone levels were over
8.8 ng/ml. If this is the case, the analisys in advance the patient's vaginal microbiome will
allow to treat the patient accordingly in order to increase the results of the ART treatment.