Infertility, Female Clinical Trial
Official title:
Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
Verified date | January 2022 |
Source | El Shatby University Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The worldwide prevalence of primary and secondary infertility is estimated at ~2% and 10.5%, respectively, among women aged 20-44 years and attempting to conceive. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) involve 9-24% of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). proper tailoring of the ovarian stimulation protocol in order to maximize the number of oocytes collected represents a crucial step for them to eventually conceive. Recent evidence indicates that in the same menstrual cycle, there are multiple follicular recruitment waves. This coincides with the theory that folliculogenesis occurs in a wave-like fashion. Thus, within a single menstrual cycle, there can theoretically be multiple opportunities for a clinician to collect oocytes, as opposed to the conventional single cohort of antral follicles during the follicular phase. Utilizing this concept, clinicians have been attempting to retrieve oocytes from poor responders using both the follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) and the luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) protocols to increase the number of oocytes collected shorter within shorter period of time. By increasing the number of the retrieved oocytes collected, a better clinical can be assured since there is a clear relationship between the number of oocytes collected and live birth rates across all female age groups. which protocol is the most effective remains controversial and the efficacy of PPOS in POR compared with that of conventional protocols is unclear.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | September 1, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 20 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: poor ovarian responders patients defined by Bologna criteria Exclusion Criteria: 1. Male factor infertility due to azoospermia. 2. Patients with uncorrected uterine pathology. 3. Patients with the diagnosis of severe endometriosis. 4. Patients with BMI over 35. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Elshatby University Maternity Hospital | Alexandria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
El Shatby University Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Egypt,
Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-91. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr039. Epub 2011 Nov 8. Review. — View Citation
Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu272. Epub 2014 Oct 31. — View Citation
Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2. — View Citation
Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19. — View Citation
Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5. — View Citation
Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 6. — View Citation
Liu C, Jiang H, Zhang W, Yin H. Double ovarian stimulation during the follicular and luteal phase in women =38 years: a retrospective case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Dec;35(6):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 24. — View Citation
Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. Epub 2012 Dec 18. — View Citation
McNatty KP, Hillier SG, van den Boogaard AM, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Reichert LE Jr, van Hall EV. Follicular development during the luteal phase of the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983 May;56(5):1022-31. — View Citation
Moffat R, Pirtea P, Gayet V, Wolf JP, Chapron C, de Ziegler D. Dual ovarian stimulation is a new viable option for enhancing the oocyte yield when the time for assisted reproductive technnology is limited. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):659-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 4. — View Citation
Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10. — View Citation
Vanden Brink H, Chizen D, Hale G, Baerwald A. Age-related changes in major ovarian follicular wave dynamics during the human menstrual cycle. Menopause. 2013 Dec;20(12):1243-54. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31828cfb62. — View Citation
Wang N, Wang Y, Chen Q, Dong J, Tian H, Fu Y, Ai A, Lyu Q, Kuang Y. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016 May;84(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/cen.12983. Epub 2015 Dec 21. — View Citation
Zhang J. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jul 25;13:76. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0076-2. — View Citation
Zhang Q, Guo XM, Li Y. Implantation rates subsequent to the transfer of embryos produced at different phases during double stimulation of poor ovarian responders. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Jun;29(6):1178-1183. doi: 10.1071/RD16020. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | the Number of M2 Oocytes Retrieved | it is the number of M2 oocytes retrieved that were being assessed after denudation | 1-2 hours after oocyte retrieval | |
Primary | the Fertilization Rate | percentage transformation of micro injected oocytes into two pronuclei. it is done 16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes by the sperms | 16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes with the sperms | |
Primary | the Resultant Embryos Number | it is the resultant embryos number counted day 3 or 4 or 5 after fertilization | the embryos number counted day 3 or 4or 5 after fertilization | |
Primary | the Implantation Rate | it is calculated as the number of intrauterine gestational sacs observed by transvaginal ultrasonography divided by the number of transferred embryos at the 6 th week of pregnancy and then multiplied by 100 | at the 6 th week of pregnancy | |
Primary | the Clinical Pregnancy Rate. | percentage of cases in which observation of a gestational sac with fetal heart beat by transvaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks of pregnancy | at the 6 th weeks of pregnancy | |
Secondary | the Difference in the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Both Protocols. | Assessing the difference in the ongoing pregnancy rate when the pregnancy had completed =20 weeks of gestation | At the 20 th week of gestation | |
Secondary | the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Total Days of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation | the total number of days of the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in both follicular and luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol are studied so as to asses the difference between the two phases, the follicular phase and the luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol | From the first day of ovarian stimulation till the last day of ovarian stimulation in each phase ,the follicular and the luteal, of stimulation | |
Secondary | the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Total Dosage of Gonadotropins Used in the Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation | Assessing the difference between the follicular phase and the luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol regarding the total dosage of gonadotropins used in the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation so as to the difference between the two phases | From the first day of ovarian stimulation till the last day of ovarian stimulation in each phase ,the follicular and the luteal, of stimulation | |
Secondary | the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Number of M2 Oocytes Retrieved | it is the number of M2 oocytes retrieved that were being assessed after denudation so as to the difference between the results between the two phases, the follicular phase and the luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol | 1-2 hours after oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Fertilization Rate. | percentage of transformation of micro injected oocytes into two pronuclei at 16 -20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes by the sperms so as to the difference between the results between the two phases, the follicular phase and the luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol | 16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes with the sperms | |
Secondary | the Difference Between the Follicular Phase and the Luteal Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Regarding the Resultant Embryos Number | the resultant embryos number are counted day 3 or 4 or 5 after fertilization so as to the difference between the results between the two phases, the follicular phase and the luteal phase of the progestin primed double stimulation protocol | the embryos number counted day 3 or 4or 5 after fertilization | |
Secondary | Assessing the Difference Between the Follicular Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol and the First Round of the Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol Regarding the Number of M2 Oocytes Retrieved . | it is the number of M2 oocytes retrieved that were being assessed after denudation.so as to study the effect of the progestin used on the ovarian response in poor ovarian responders, we have compared the follicular phase of the dual stimulation group and first follicular wave of the flexible antagonist group | 1-2 hours after oocyte retrieval | |
Secondary | Assessing the Difference Between the Follicular Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol and the First Round of the Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol Regarding the Fertilization Rate. | it is percentage transformation of micro injected oocytes into two pronuclei.so as to study the effect of the progestin used on the ovarian response and its results in poor ovarian responders, we have compared the follicular phase of the dual stimulation group and first follicular wave of the flexible antagonist group | 16 to 20 hours after microinjection of the oocytes by the sperms | |
Secondary | Assessing the Difference Between the Follicular Phase of the Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol and the First Round of the Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol Regarding the Resultant Embryos Number. | it is the number of the resultant embryos counted at day 3 or 4 or 5 after fertilization.so as to study the effect of the progestin used on the ovarian response and the resultant embryos number in poor ovarian responders, we have compared the follicular phase of the dual stimulation group and first follicular wave of the flexible antagonist group | at day 3 or 4or 5 after fertilization |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05969574 -
Is Decreased Ovarian Reserve Related to an Increased Number of Previous Early Miscarriages?
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05358483 -
PROspective Study of Mothers' and Infants' Social and Epidemiologic Determinants of Health
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05969795 -
Comparison of Live Birth Rate in Natural Cycle Single Euploid FET Versus Without Luteal Phase Support
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06051201 -
Innovation for Small-scale Experiments: ReceptIVFity Test
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03177538 -
Corifollitropin Alfa Combined With Menotropin Versus Follitropin and Lutropin Alfa in Expected Suboptimal Responders
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03638856 -
Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Hysteroscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04052464 -
The Study of the Implantation Window From Endometrial Biopsy With Gene Expression Methods
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04753736 -
Immunophenotypage of RIF and RM Patients and Intrauterine Administration of PBMC
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03349905 -
Deferred Versus Fresh Embryo Transfers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05076981 -
Progesterone Levels During Ovulation and Luteal Phase
|
||
Completed |
NCT04096027 -
Cabergoline Before or After Oocyte Collection for Follicular Resolution
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05980091 -
Optimal Timing of Euploid Day 6 Blastocyst Transfer in Frozen HRT Cycles, Day 6 or Day 7 of Progesterone Administration.
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01933633 -
Improved Fertility After Exercise in Overweight/Obese Women
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01202643 -
Effect of Colony Stimulating Factor on Poor Endometrial Development During IVF
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01202656 -
Effect of Colony Stimulating Factor on Implantation and Pregnancy Rates Following IVF (in Vitro Fertilization)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01408615 -
A Post Marketing Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elonva (Corifollitropin Alfa) in General Practice (P08165)
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05698550 -
The Role of Erzhi Tiangui Formula in Expected POR Women Undergoing IVF-ET
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03910582 -
Personalized FET in RIF Patients With Displaced Dating
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05440019 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Usability of the M3T Fertigo System and Its Calibration
|
||
Completed |
NCT05130125 -
Retrospective Cohort Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Fresh or Frozen Embryo Transfer
|