View clinical trials related to Infections.
Filter by:This is a multicentre observational study involving NNUs across the UK. Study personnel (Neonatologists and research Nurses) from these NNUs will identify eligible babies in whom a positive culture has been obtained. This study will help identify the infections leading to death in babies on UK neonatal units, define the clinical characteristics of babies dying from infections, and describe the management of babies dying from infections with a specific focus in their antimicrobial treatment.
This is a prospective clinical intervention trial where patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis are randomized to either normal healthy diet or a diet with elimination of emulsifying agents within the E 400-group with special respect to carragenan, CMC and polysorbates. At study start and end after one month their diet, clinical characteristics and microbiota will be analysed. The hypotheses are that their disease activity measured with calprotectin and their microbiota will improve after intervention.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about, test, and compare JCXH-221 in healthy volunteers. The main aims to answer are: - To assess the safety and tolerability of the JCXH-221 vaccine in healthy adult subjects - To identify an optimal dose for the JCXH-221 vaccine in healthy adult subjects - To assess the humoral immunogenicity of the JCXH-221 vaccine in healthy adult subjects - To characterize the cellular immunogenicity of the JCXH-221 vaccine in healthy adult subjects Participants for Phase I will be randomized to either JCXH-221 or placebo. In Phase 2, participants will be randomized to either JCXH-221 or a FDA approved Active comparator.
NeonIN is a is a neonatal infection surveillance database which will facilitate active surveillance for bacterial infections through a network of neonatal units, using standardised definitions, proformas and microbiological techniques. The centralised and secure web-based database will allow real-time entry of data and rapid and timely analysis of results.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a chlorhexidine impregnated dressing for peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) to the standard dressing currently used in general medical and surgical inpatient wards. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Study Feasibility - Occurrence of infectious complications related to the PIVC Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either of the below dressings to cover and secure their PIVC: - The standard dressing used at their hospital, or - The intervention dressing which has Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) on it Researchers will compare standard and CHG dressings to see if the presence of CHG improves the occurrence of infectious complications related to the PIVC.
Surgical site infection (SSI), particularly deep SSI, is one of the most serious complications after spinal surgery. evaluating the risk of SSI and, correspondingly, prescription of prophylactic measures are extremely important to prevent SSI and avoid potentially devastating consequences. A retrospective study was conducted aiming to develop a point-based prediction model of deep surgical site infection in patients receiving open posterior instrumented thoracolumbar surgery.
The goal of this assessor blinded randomized controlled trial is to compare a lock solution containing taurolidine, citrate and heparin to a heparin only lock solution for the prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections in paediatric oncology patients with a central venous access device.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea, and the most common health care-associated infectious disease in the United States, accounting for 15% of overall infections, nearly 30.000 deaths per year an estimated economic expense of $5 billion/year. In the last decade, most of the burden related to CDI depends on recurrence CDI (rCDI) (3). rCDI is known to extend the hospitalization length, and to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, rCDI is often, more than primary infection, associated with life-threatening complications, including pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, shock, perforation, bloodstream infection (BSI), sepsis, caused by intestinal bacteria or fungi with a mortality rate nearly 50%, and death. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), defined as the infusion of feces from healthy donors to recipient with disorders associated to dysbiosis, is known to be a highly effective treatment option against CDI. FMT is also more effective than standard treatment with vancomycin and it is recommended by International Guidelines for treating multiple recurrence of CDI. Despite the increasing body of evidence about the clinical efficacy of FMT for the treatment of rCDI, mechanisms for this clinical efficacy are also unknown. Metagenomics analysis is known as a good option to examine gut microbiota and to estimate microbial diversity. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in microbial composition in rCDI patients after FMT, using metagenomics analysis.
This work aims to: 1. Validate the performance of CRP, and PCT in early differentiating IFI from bacterial bloodstream infections. 2. Compare the results of CRP and PCT with the results of β-D- glucan. 3. Find the relationship between biomarkers levels [CRP, PCT and β-D- glucan] and the results of blood culture which is the gold standard of diagnosis.
Background Anal fissure is one of the most common anorectal problems. After an outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has rapidly spread from China to almost all over the world, it nearly affected all countries. In spite of its typical presentation in the form of fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue and pneumonia, other GIT manifestations were reported. We found some of COVID-19 survivors who had complained from anal fissure problem. The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of acute anal fissure among COVID-19 patients, its possible risk factors and outcome. Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study which was conducted over three months from the start of September 2020 to the end of November 2020 at Mansoura university isolation hospital, on COVID-19 patients' who were diagnosed with anal fissure. Those who survived and were discharged home safely were telephone called to pick up whether they suffered from any symptoms of anal pain, difficulty in defecation suggesting anal fissure, in order to identify their outcomes, the risk factors for anal fissure development and how they were managed. Results A total of 176 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups. The first group included patients who developed anal fissure (n=65) and the 2nd group included patients who did not develop anal fissure (n=111). No significant difference was noted in demographic data apart from the age which was younger in the fissure group. The incidence of anal fissure was 36.9% of total population. The majority of patients' anal fissure problem resolved spontaneously after patients improved from the COVID symptoms without receiving any treatment (43.1%). Conclusion Anal fissure is quite common problem after COVID-19. Young and middle age patients are more vulnerable to develop anal fissure after COVID-19 infection.